Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Daugherty v. Godinez”
Robert McCarty v. Menard, Inc.public domain
St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Robert McCarty tripped over a product display sign at a Menard's home improvement store and then filed suit. The district court dismissed the case at summary judgment in favor of Menard. We affirm based on the open and obvious doctrine which implicates the general duty of care owed to business invitees in Illinois.
Robert McCarty v. Menard, Inc.public domain
St. Eve , Circuit Judge . Robert McCarty tripped over a product display sign at a Menard's home improvement store and then filed suit. The district court dismissed the case at summary judgment in favor of Menard. We affirm based on the open and obvious doctrine which implicates the general duty of care owed to business invitees in Illinois. <
Murphy v. Raoulpublic domain
Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge Paul Murphy is indigent and homeless. He was convicted of possession of child pornography in 2012 and received a sentence of three years' probation. Five years after his release date, and nearly twice the number of years of his sentence, he remains incarcerated because the Department of Corrections cannot find an appropriate place for him live. Illinois, like many st
Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. Ace Foster Care & Pediatric Home Nursing Agency Corp.public domain
OPINION CRONE, Judge. Case Summary Indiana Family and Social Services Administration ("FSSA"), Division of Family and Children, Lake County Office, appeals the granting of a preliminary injunction requiring the Lake County Office of Family and Children ("LCOFC") to contract with Ace Foster Care and Pediatric Home Nursing Agency Corporation ("Ace"). We reverse. Issue
Richie v. Sirmonspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE KERN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with its July 25, 2005, opinion. See Richie v. Mullin, 417 F.3d 1117, 1125 (10th Cir.2005). By Order entered April 27, 2004 (Dkt. # 55), this Court adopted and affirmed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Jud
State v. Campbellpublic domain
983 So.2d 810 (2008) STATE of Louisiana v. LaDerrick CAMPBELL. No. 2006-KA-0286. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 21, 2008. Rehearing Denied June 27, 2008. *815 Capital Appeals Project, Jelpi Pierre Picou, Jr., G. Benjamin Cohen, Aneel Lachman Chablani, New Orleans, Counsel for Appellant. James D. Caldwell,
People v. Stewartpublic domain
15 Cal.Rptr.3d 656 (2004) 93 P.3d 271 33 Cal.4th 425 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard Bert STEWART, Defendant and Appellant. No. S020803. Supreme Court of California. July 15, 2004. Rehearing Denied September 1, 2004. *663 Melissa Hill, Corrales, und
People v. Dalepublic domain
189 Ill. App.3d 704 (1989) 545 N.E.2d 521 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOMMIE DALE et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 1-86-0515, 1-86-0716 cons. Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division). Opinion filed September 29, 1989. *705 *70
Marilyn v. Statepublic domain
Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do