⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Darral Edwards”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-05-06 · Published · cited 1× · 821 F.3d 877; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8450; 2016 WL 2642057
FLAUM, Circuit Judge,- Defendant-appellant Darral C. Morris pled guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Morris later tried to withdraw his guilty plea, but the district court denied his motion. The district court found that Morris met the requirements of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (“ACCA”),- and accordi
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2020-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Edward Darrall Anderson * From the 266th District Court a/k/a Edward Darrell Anderson, of Erath County, Trial Court No. CR14941. Vs. No. 11-19-00020-CR * December 18, 2020 The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wri
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2020-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed December 18, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-19-00020-CR ___________ EDWARD DARRALL ANDERSON A/K/A EDWARD DARRELL ANDERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 266th District Cou
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006-02-01 · Published · cited 14× · 893 A.2d 147; 2006 Pa. Super. 15; 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 48
OPINION BY JOYCE, J.: ¶ 1 The Commonwealth brings this appeal from a trial court order, which was entered on July 15, 2004, granting Dion Lamar Williams, Gerald Woods, and Dar-rale Markese Gaines’ (collectively “Appel-lees’”) motion in limine barring the introduction of prior testimony. For the reasons that follow, we quash the appeal as it was untimely filed. The relevant facts and procedural histor
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005-01-12 · Published · cited 7× · 865 A.2d 999; 2005 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 22
865 A.2d 999 (2005) JOHNSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY, and H.A.R.I.E., Petitioners v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (LEWIS), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs November 24, 2004. Decided January 12, 2005. *1000 Paul S. Mazeski, Pittsburgh, for petitioner. Richard J. Russell, Johnstown, for r
State v. Lormandpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000-10-11 · Published · cited 3× · 771 So. 2d 734; 0 La.App. 3 Cir. 0435; 2000 La. App. LEXIS 2309; 2000 WL 1509974
| JETERS, Judge. A jury convicted the defendant, Jason Keith Lormand, of two counts of first degree murder, violations of La.R.S. 14:30. However, the jury could not reach a unanimous decision during the sentencing phase of the trial, and the trial court then sentenced him on each count to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. The defendant has appealed, asserting thre
District Court, D. Nevada · 2006-07-20 · Published · cited 15× · 442 F. Supp. 2d 1008; 2006 WL 2039973
442 F.Supp.2d 1008 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. R.D. PRABHU, M.D. and R.D. Prabhu-Lata Shete, M.D.'s, Ltd., Defendants. No. 2:04-CV-0589-RCJ-LRL. United States District Court, D. Nevada. July 20, 2006. *1009 *1010 Roger W. Wenthe, U.S. Attorney's Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Pl
Fritz v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 290 P. 193; 48 Okla. Crim. 166; 1930 OK CR 302; 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 59
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of willfully, unlawfully, and wrongfully pointing a deadly weapon, to wit, a pistol, at S.H. and D.M. Merchant, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and cost and be confined in the county jail for three months. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, and overruled, and defendant excepted, and by petition in error and case-made has appealed to this court. The testimony on behalf of the state, in substa
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-07-14 · Published · cited 21× · 315 F. Supp. 2d 375; 2003 WL 21543841
315 F.Supp.2d 375 (2003) WANTANABE REALTY CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. No. 01 CIV.10137 LAK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 10, 2003. As Corrected July 14, 2003. *376 *377 *378
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006-05-02 · Published · cited 402× · 896 A.2d 1191; 587 Pa. 1; 2006 Pa. LEXIS 659
OPINION Justice NEWMAN. Mark Newton Spotz (Spotz) appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County (PCRA court) denying his Petition for Post Conviction Relief pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA).1 For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the Order of the PCRA court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Booth-El v. Nuthpublic domain
District Court, D. Maryland · 2001-04-20 · Published · cited 3× · 140 F. Supp. 2d 495; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5665; 2001 WL 419966
140 F.Supp.2d 495 (2001) John BOOTH-EL, Petitioner v. Eugene M. NUTH, et al., Respondents No. CIV.A. CCB-97-1252. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 20, 2001. *496 *497 *498 *499 Nevett Steele, Jr., Glyndon
Booth v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992-06-24 · Published · cited 34× · 608 A.2d 162; 327 Md. 142; 1992 Md. LEXIS 119
RODOWSKY, Judge. Appellant, John Booth (Booth), having previously been found guilty of murdering Irvin and Rose Bronstein in 1983, now appeals from the death sentence which a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the third time has imposed on him as the direct perpetrator of the murder of Irvin Bronstein.1 The evidence underlying the finding
Roby v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899-06-22 · Published · cited 3× · 51 S.W. 1114; 41 Tex. Crim. 152
The charging part of the indictment is as follows: "That Edwin Roby, * * * being then and there the agent, manager, and president of the Tyler Banking Company, the same being then and there a banking institution doing business in Smith County, Texas, did then and there unlawfully receive and assent to the reception into the said Tyler Banking Company, a deposit of money, to wit, one hundred dollars in lawful money of the United States of the value of one hundred dollars, from P.E. Arthur, aft