Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Darius D McCoy”
United States v. Darius Jeffersonpublic domain
HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Darius Jefferson was convicted following a jury trial of five counts relating to the distribution of co *939 caine base, also known as “crack” cocaine, including conspiracy to distribute cocaine base (Count 1), maintaining a place for the purp
Rodgers v. Horizons at Monticello, LLPpublic domain
Devine, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Meddaugh, J.), entered September 22, 2014 in Sullivan County, which, among other things, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. On October 31, 2012, plaintiff Darius Rodgers (hereinafter plaintiff) was attending a Halloween party at an apartment complex owned by defendant
State ex rel. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2024-Ohio-2079.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : Giant Eagle, Inc., : Relator, : No. 23AP-119 v.
State v. Jonespublic domain
ROBERT A. CHAISSON, Judge. |2On December 13, 2010, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Christopher Jones, a/k/a Larry Jones, with battery of a police officer requiring medical attention, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:34.2; hit-and-run driving, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:100; possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:95.1; and possession of mari
State v. Yacobuccipublic domain
[Cite as State v. Yacobucci, 2019-Ohio-36.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney Plaintiff-Appellee :
Dwayne Ballinger, Jr. v. John Prelesnikpublic domain
OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Following an evidentiary hearing, the district court granted Dwayne Ballinger’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The government appeals. For the following reasons, the district court’s decision will be reversed. I. BACKGROUND This matter arises from an early morning shoo
State of Tennessee v. Cornelius Williams, IVpublic domain
10/16/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 4, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORNELIUS WILLIAMS IV Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 22-00996 Carlyn L. Addison, Judge ___________________________________
Wells v. Statepublic domain
849 So.2d 1231 (2003) Dexter Tramayne WELLS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2002-KA-00401-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 8, 2003. Rehearing Denied August 7, 2003. *1233 Ross Parker Simons, Thomas L. Musselman, Biloxi, attorneys for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, attorneys
Attorney Grievance v. Armstrongpublic domain
Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Darryl Russel Armstrong, Misc. Docket AG No. 35, September Term, 2019 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT – Court of Appeals disbarred lawyer who, among other misconduct, failed to take necessary and fundamental steps in cases, failed to respond to discovery, failed to appear at pre-trial conferences and hearings on behalf of clients, appeared at proceedings unprepared, abandoned representation of clients, failed to sufficiently and timely communicate with
Estate of James Franklin Perry v. Cheryl Wenzelpublic domain
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. James Franklin Perry died on the floor of the Milwaukee County Criminal Justice Facility less than 24 hours after Milwaukee City police officers arrested him. Shortly after he was arrested, Perry suffered a seizure. The City transported him to the hospital where he received treatment. But, after he returned to the City jail, the Cit
Dexter Tramayne Wells v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KA-00401-SCT DEXTER TRAMAYNE WELLS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/4/2001 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KATHY KING JACKSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ROSS PARKER SIMONS
OPINION ENSLEN, Chief Judge.. This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Motion for Leave to File First Amended Class Action Complaint (“Motion for Leave”). For the reasons which follow, the motions will be granted. BACKGROUND This action was first brought under the Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”, 15 U.S
Zeiger v. Wilfpublic domain
755 A.2d 608 (2000) 333 N.J. Super. 258 Shelley ZEIGER, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. Joseph WILF, Defendant-Respondent, and Capitol Plaza Assoc., Trenton and Goldberger, Moore & Novick Trenton No. 2, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants, and Goldberger, Moore & Novick, Urban Renewal, L.P., as successor to 240 West, L.P., and Goldberger, Moore & Novick, Trenton, Inc., Defendants.
Lee & Boutell Co. v. C. A. Brockett Cement Co.public domain
* NOTE: Opinion filed at September Term, 1936, April 21, 1937; motion for rehearing and motion to transfer to Court en Banc filed; motions overruled at May Term, 1937, June 21, 1937. This is an equitable mechanics' lien action involving liens totaling, in principal amounts, $2,117.04 against Lot Three and $8,524.95 against Lot Four (contiguous lots), in Block Twenty-one of Romanelli Gardens, an addition in Kansas City,
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Homan v. Hellmanpublic domain
Maxwell, Ch. J. In March, 1887, the defendant in error brought an action in the district court of Douglas county against the plaintiffs in error to remove a cloud and quiet the title to the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of séction 34, township 16 north, of range 13 east, in Douglas county. An amended answer was filed by the defendant below in which he alleged that the plaintiff below was not in possession of the l
PER CURIAM. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions of law certified to the Court of Appeals as questions of law which ought to he reviewed by said court-: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Charles B. Alexander? (2) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Henry M. Ale