Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dannie Lee Davis, Sr.”
Windstream Corporation v. Johnny Leepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1723 ___________________________ Windstream Corporation; Windstream Benefits Committee; Windstream Systems of the Midwest Inc.; Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP, doing business as Windstream Communications Southwest lllllllllllllllllllll Plain
Danny Lee Bell, Sr. A/K/A Danny Lee Bell v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-214-CR DANNY LEE BELL, SR. APPELLANT A/K/A DANNY LEE BELL <
Danny Lee Bell, Sr. A/K/A Danny Lee Bell v. Statepublic domain
BELL V. STATE COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-214-CR DANNY LEE BELL, SR. APPELLANT A/K/A DANNY LEE BELL
State v. Davispublic domain
WILLIAMS, C.J. The defendant, Dennis R. Davis, Jr., was charged by bill of information with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated ("DWI"), fourth offense, in violation of La. R.S. 14:98(D) and 14:98.4. Following a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to serve 23 years at hard labor, with two years to be served without the benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. He was also or
State v. Davispublic domain
WILLIAMS, C.J. The defendant, Dennis R. Davis, Jr., was charged by bill of information with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated ("DWI"), fourth offense, in violation of La. R.S. 14:98(D) and 14:98.4. Following a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to serve 23 years at hard labor, with two years to be served without the benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. He was also or
Windstream Corporation v. Johnny Leepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1723 ___________________________ Windstream Corporation; Windstream Benefits Committee; Windstream Systems of the Midwest Inc.; Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP, doing business as Windstream Communications Southwest lllllllllllllllllllll Plain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC
02-11-378--390-CV_COR
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Juan Adamepublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00654-CV UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant V. JUAN ADAME, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AMELIA ADAME (DECEASED); TONY ALVARADO; CAROLINE ANDREWS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF JEROME JOHNSON, SR. (DECEASED); VANESSA BA
State v. Leepublic domain
764 So.2d 1122 (2000) STATE of Louisiana v. Charles LEE. No. 99-KA-1404. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 17, 2000. *1123 Laura Pavy, Louisiana Appellate Project, New Orleans, Louisiana, Counsel for Defendant. Court composed of Judge WILLIAM H. BYRNES, III, Judge STEVEN R. PLOTKIN, Judge DENNIS R. BAGNERIS
Counce v. Councepublic domain
Following an ore tenus proceeding the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County divorced the parties, made a division of property, and awarded the wife alimony in the amount of $150 per month. The husband appeals. He contends that the trial court erred in its award of alimony and that the final decree did not reflect the agreed upon stipulations made by the parties prior to the hearing. I. The award of periodic alimony is a matter committed to the sound discre
State v. Hensleypublic domain
BRYANT, Judge. *174Where the trial court did not violate Rule 106 or otherwise abuse its discretion by admitting into evidence a detective's handwritten notes after defendant opened the door to this evidence during cross-examination, we find no error. The State's evidence tended to show that Danny Stanley purchased a .40-caliber
George County v. Davispublic domain
721 So.2d 1101 (1998) GEORGE COUNTY, Mississippi By and Through its BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; Clyde W. Eubanks, Sr., Individually; R. Wayne Christian, Individually; Ralph B. Fairley, Individually; Larry A. Havard, Individually; and Norman C. Howell, Individually v. J.B. DAVIS, State of Mississippi and Office of the Mississippi State Auditor. No. 97-CA-00188-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi.
State of Tennessee v. Christopher A. Davispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 19, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER A. DAVIS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 96-B-866 J. Randall Wyatt, Judge No. M2001-01866-CCA-R3-DD - Filed March 25, 2003 The Appellant, Christopher A. Davis, was found guilty by a jury of two cou
Bell v. Statepublic domain
169 S.W.3d 384 (2005) Danny Lee BELL, Sr. a/k/a Danny Lee Bell, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-03-214-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. July 7, 2005. *388 Law Offices of Moore & Cummings, Larry M. Moore, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney, Charles M. Mallin, Debra
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS West Virginia Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission, FILED Petitioner July 27, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 15-0099
LIST OF DECISIONS ANNOUNCED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 2014 Stuart, J. 1130609 Franklin Leroy Stephens v. Hazel Colley (Appeal from Pike Circuit Court: CV-13-900180). Reversed And Remanded. Circuit Judge, Thomas E. Head, III, (334) 897-5525 Aplt. Atty., Joel Lee Williams, (334) 566-8484 Aple. Atty., Elizabeth McAdory Borg
George County, Mississippi v. J B Davispublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 97-CA-00188-SCT GEORGE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; CLYDE W. EUBANKS, SR., INDIVIDUALLY; R. WAYNE CHRISTIAN, INDIVIDUALLY; RALPH B. FAIRLEY, INDIVIDUALLY; LARRY A. HAVARD, INDIVIDUALLY; AND NORMAN C. HOWELL, INDIVIDUALLY v. J. B. DAVIS, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AND OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI STATE AUDITOR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/96 TRIAL JUDG
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
GARRETT, J. JjThe defendant, Tommy Lee Wilson, was found guilty . as charged of three counts of first .degree murder by unanimous votes „ of the jury. Although the defendant had been indicted for first degree murder, the state did not seek the death penalty. The trial court imposed *617the mandatory life sentence without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of s
Sherfey v. Sherfeypublic domain
74 S.W.3d 777 (2002) Mark Anthony SHERFEY, Sr. and Laurie Sherfey, Appellants, v. Marcus D. SHERFEY and Naomi Sherfey, Appellees. No. 2001-CA-000519-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. January 18, 2002. Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court June 5, 2002. *779 William Yesowitch, Louisville, KY, for appellants