Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Wilson and Lisa Wilson”
Neely v. Wilsonpublic domain
331 S.W.3d 900 (2011) Byron D. NEELY, Individually and Byron D. Neely, M.D., P.A., Appellants, v. Nanci WILSON; CBS Stations Group of Texas, L.P., d/b/a KEYE-TV; and Viacom, Inc., Appellees. No. 03-08-00495-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. February 9, 2011. *903 J. Bruce Bennett, Cardwell, Hart & Bennett, L.L.P., James
People v. Wilsonpublic domain
827 N.E.2d 416 (2005) 214 Ill.2d 394 292 Ill.Dec. 887 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Howard W. WILSON, Appellee. No. 98111. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 24, 2005. *418 Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield, Diane Sipich, State's Attorney, Tuscola (Gary
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), brings this action against Donald R. Wilson (“Wilson”) and his company DRW Investments, LLC (“DRW” and collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of Sections 6(c) and 9(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 13(a)(2). Defendants move
People v. Wilsonpublic domain
824 N.E.2d 191 (2005) 214 Ill.2d 127 291 Ill.Dec. 615 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. David E. WILSON, Appellant. No. 97354. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 21, 2005. *192 Daniel M. Kirwan, Deputy Defender, and Nancy L. Vincent, Assistant Defender, of the Office
Wilson v. Circle K Stores, Inc.public domain
ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s
DISSENTING OPINION ON EN BANC RECONSIDERATION BONNIE SUDDERTH, JUSTICE I respectfully dissent from the en banc majority’s opinion for the reasons set forth in the original majority opinion on rehearing, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A. DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ., join. . APPENDIX A 491 S.W.3d 433 Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort W
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 27, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NOR
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wilson, 2024-Ohio-461.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111912 v. :
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wilson, 2023-Ohio-1890.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111912 v. : ELLIS JAMES WILSON, :
Wilson v. Wilsonpublic domain
KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Cheryl Wilson appeals from a district court judgment granting her a divorce from Brian Wilson, distributing the parties’ marital estate, and ordering Brian Wilson pay child support. We conclude the district court did not err in distributing the parties’ marital estate. However, we conclude the district court incorrectly calculated Brian Wilson’s 2011 and 20
People v. Wilsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LESTER HARLAND WILSON, Defendant and Appellant. S189373 Riverside County Superior Court RIF079858 June 8, 2023 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and J
Chief Justice JEFFERSON, joined by Justice GREEN and Justice LEHRMANN, dissenting. The Court holds that the broadcast presented a false impression, an untenable “gist,” that the doctor was disciplined for operating on patients while taking dangerous drugs. But that gist is reasonably derived from the medical board’s findings, the doctor’s testimony, and witness observations. If the news report is damning, it is b
State v. Wilsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 182 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Zachery A. Wilson, Defendant and Appellant No. 20250169 Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge. AFFIRMED. Opinion of the Court
Bedgar v. Wilsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2026 ND 51 Sarah E. Bedgar, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jeremy R. Wilson, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest No. 20250389 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judi
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY RANDY DAVID WILSON, ) ) Defendant/Appellant, ) ) V. ) Case No.: CPU4-19-004583 ) DELMARVA POWER AND ) LIGHT COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) ) V. ) ) Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: November 30, 2020 Paul G. Enterline, Esq. Lisa C. McLaughlin, Esq. Paul G. Enterline, P.A. Paul S. Seward, Esq. 113 South Race Street Phillips Goldman McLaughlin P.O. Box 826 & Hall, P.A. Georgetown, DE 19947 1200 North
United States v. Daniel T. Shermanpublic domain
*789 WOLLMAN, Chief Judge. Daniel Sherman, Fortino Diaz, Robert' Lohr, and Vanessa Lohr appeal their convictions and sentences stemming from a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine. We affirm. I. The defendants were convicted after a lengthy t
Wilson v. Rose Metals Industries, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Wilson v. Rose Metals Industries, Inc., 2021-Ohio-4518.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA GREGORY WILSON, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110461 v. : ROSE METALS
Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.public domain
Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. *574 *880 Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 ( section 425.16 ), commonly known as the anti-SLAPP statute, allows defendants to request early judicial scr
Rhonda Wilson v. USI Insurance Services LLCpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 20-3124 ____________ RHONDA H. WILSON; THE LAW OFFICES OF RHONDA HILL WILSON, P.C., Appellants v. USI INSURANCE SERVICE LLC; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ____________ On Appeal from the
Robert G. Lewis v. Lisa M. Lewispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00016-COA ROBERT G. LEWIS APPELLANT v. LISA M. LEWIS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/16/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI B. DANIELS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR A