Cases

NUMBER 13-12-00355-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ DANIEL WALTER WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. _________________________________________________

CUNNINGHAM, J„ DISSENTING: I respectfully, but forcefully dissent. One would have to live on the dark side of the moon today to not know the following, unfortunate truth. Law enforcement officers are under siege. Today, with our majority opinion, we break down a lawful barrier that protects these brave men and women from frivolous and unwarranted lawsuits. From henceforth, our detectives and p

OPINION BY OLSON, J.: Appellant, Frederick Williams, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on March 24, 2017, as made final by the denial of his post-sentence motion on April 6, 2017. As part of his plea agreement, Appellant stipulated that the Commonwealth would be substantially prejudiced if he attempted to withdraw his guilty plea. We hold that this stipulation was binding. A

OPINION OF THE COURT Barbara Howe, S. Decedent died on November 1, 2014, survived by several nieces and nephews. Her will dated May 25, 2012 was offered for probate on December 18, 2014 by her nominated executor and great-nephew, James Bastían. The 2012 will, after payment of debts and administration expenses, leaves the entire residuary estate to James. A prior will, dated March 10, 198

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1'. Walter Williams was the public works director for the City of Belzoni until the board of aldermen voted not to renew his employment. Williams did not exercise his statutory, right, to appeal the board’s decision to circuit court. Instead, more than a year later, he-filed an independent lawsuit against the city and one alderman (Gary Farmer) in circuit court, asserting claims fo

544 F.3d 182 (2008) Susan L. WALTER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael F. Walter, deceased; Michael V. Walter; Lianna Walter, a minor, and through Susan L. Walter, per parent and natural guardian; Donna Walter, a minor, by and through Susan L. Walter, her parent and natural guardian; Erik Walter, a minor, by and through Susan L. Walter, his parent and natural guardian; Daniel Walter, a minor, by and through Susan L. Walter, his

MEMORANDUM William M. Nickerson, Senior United States District Judge Before the Court are the following dis-positive motions: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Reconsideration, and Modification filed by the Walter E. Campbell Company, Inc. (WECCO), ECF No. 337; Motion for Final Summary Judgment filed by Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corporation (PCIGC), ECF No. 339; Motion for

465 F.Supp.2d 409 (2006) Susan L. WALTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PIKE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, and the Pike County District Attorney's Office, et al., Defendants. No. 3:03-CV-1690. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. November 29, 2006. *411 Daniel J. O'Brien, John A. Orlando, Mary E. Dixon, White and Williams LLP, Phila

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0152 Filed August 5, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. WALTER CORDELL WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Kellyann Lekar, Judge. The defendant appeals from his convictions for involuntary manslaughter while committ

300 F.Supp.2d 436 (2004) Kristie DANIEL, Earl Daniel, individually and as guardians and next friends of Jennifer Daniel, an infant under the age of eighteen, Plaintiffs, v. Bonnie BEAVER, M.D., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:02-0174. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. February 6, 2004. *437 Sc

28 So.3d 1221 (2010) Darrel WILLIAMS v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF LAFAYETTE and Walter Guillory. No. 09-753. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 3, 2010. *1223 Roy J. Richard, Jr., Daniel James Stanford, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants-Appellants, Lafayette Housing Authority and Walter Guillory. M. C

501 F.Supp.2d 1219 (2007) Todd WILLIAMS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC., A New Jersey Corporation, Ha-International, LLC., A Delaware limited liability company, and Richard Parker, an individual, Defendants. No. 3:02-cv-10145-JAJ-RAW. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Davenport Division. July 2, 2007. *1220

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01497-COA WALTER WILLIAMS APPELLANT v. CITY OF BELZONI AND ALDERMAN GARY APPELLEES FARMER, INDIVIDUALLY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HUMPHREYS COUNTY CIRCUIT

Benham, Justice, dissenting. I write because I respectfully disagree with the majority’s opinion reversing the decision of the Court of Appeals to allow this premises liability case to go to a jury. The majority reasons that appellees’ claims cannot survive summary judgment because the decedent had equal knowledge, as compared to appellants, that there were alligators in and around The Landings community. Premis

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Mildred Robinson, as next-of-kin of Steven Walters, deceased, and on behalf of Walters’s minor children, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Daniel Arrugueta, a law enforcement officer, in her action alleging use of excessive force resulting in Walters’s death. I.

ANDREWS, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Although no one saw what happened, there is evidence that an eight-foot-long wild alligator present in a lagoon at The Landings *331residential community attacked and killed Gwyneth Williams as she walked alone at night near the lagoon. Ms. Williams’s heirs and es

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, four appellants, Charles Harrison, Walter Henry, Vernon McCall, and Daniel Stover, raise numerous challenges to their convictions and sentences for drug conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute. After reviewing the challenged pre-trial, trial, post-trial, and sente

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2006, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Chief Justice Cappy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff-Appellant filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging numerous claims arising out of a dispute between him and the New York City fire department. Adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judg

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2006, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Chief Justice Cappy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.