⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Daniel W Key”

Key v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 534 S.W.3d 869
ORDER PER CURIAM: Deandre J. Key appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court- of Jackson County denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Key’s motion follows his convictions for one count of assault in the. first degree, one count of unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of armed criminal action. Key argues that the motion court e
State v. Keypublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-04-08 · Published · cited 4× · 437 S.W.3d 264; 2014 WL 1363672; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 395
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. Deandre J. Key appeals his convictions and sentences, following a jury trial, for unlawful use of a weapon (Count III), under section 571.030, and armed criminal action (Count IV), under section 571.015.1 Key first claims that there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions. In support of his insufficiency claim, Key argues that section 571.030.1(9) was enact
State v. Daniel M.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-03-01 · Published · cited 2× · 210 Conn. App. 819
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015-01-27 · Published · cited 8× · 453 S.W.3d 352; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 64
James Edward Welsh, Judge Diamond International Trucks, formerly known as KCR International Trucks, Inc., appeals from the judgment entered by the circuit court following a jury verdict of $10,000,000 in damages on Steven Key’s negligence claim for personal injuries but assessing 35 percent fault to Diamond International and 65 percent fault to Key. Diamond International asserts
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 915 N.W.2d 455; 381 Wis. 2d 471; 2018 WI App 28
Affirmed.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2009-06-11 · Published · cited 12× · 290 S.W.3d 332; 2009 WL 1156458
290 S.W.3d 332 (2009) KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Joseph B. EUSTACE, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 11-07-00314-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. April 30, 2009. Rehearing Overruled June 11, 2009. *334 Harper Estes, Steven C. Kiser, B. Blue Hyatt, Scott M. Kidwell, Lynch Chappell
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2005-06-14 · Published · cited 16× · 2005 NMSC 14; 137 N.M. 517; 2005 NMSC 014
2005 NMSC 014 IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER S. KEY, ESQ. An Attorney Licensed to Practice Before the Courts of the State of New Mexico. Docket No. 29,089. Supreme Court of New Mexico. Filing Date: June 1, 2005. Corrected June 14, 2005. Virginia L. Ferrara, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Albuquerque, NM, for Disciplinary Board. Charles W. Daniels, Albuque
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006-08-11 · Published · cited 9× · 447 F. Supp. 2d 648; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58142; 2006 WL 2346423
447 F.Supp.2d 648 (2006) Peter KALTMAN, Malcolm Lord, Celeste Navon, David W. Ortbals, Paul Steward, Garco Investments, LLP Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Francis D. John, Royce Mitchell, Richard J. Alario, and James J. Byerlotzer, Defendants. No. MO-04-CV-082. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Midland-Odessa Division.<
Hopper v. Danielpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001-02-07 · Published · cited 1× · 72 Ark. App. 344; 38 S.W.3d 370; 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 46
JOHN F. STROUD, Jr., Chief Judge. This appeal involves a quiet-tide action, with an alternative prayer for partition, that was brought by appellants John Henry Hopper and his wife Betty J. Hopper. John Hopper is a grandson of Augustus and Martha Hopper, who acquired tide to a combined total of 120 acres in Yell County, the property in question, in the 1800s. Appellant Hopper’s father, Lawrence, was one of se
Key v. Tylerpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2024-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/28/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO SARAH PLOTT KEY, B322246 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BP131447) v. ELIZABETH PLOTT TYLER et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Co
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013-08-30 · Published · cited 2× · 497 B.R. 604; 2013 WL 4718932
Chapter 7 ORDER DENYING TIMOTHY REAR-DON’S MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION [ECF No.’s 736, 744] SEEKING PERMISSION TO SUE MARCUM LLP ET AL. IN DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 12-20829-CTV-LENARD John K. Olson, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court This Chapter 7 case came on for hearing on August 21, 2013, on the Motion [ECF 736] and Amended Motion [ECF 744] filed by Timothy Patrick Reardon (“
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 579
Affirmed.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 579
Affirmed.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025-03-11 · Published · cited 8× · 566 P.3d 591; 2025 OK 19
SANDERS v. TURN KEY HEALTH CLINICS2025 OK 19Case Number: 121589Decided: 03/11/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 19, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. PHILI
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-25 · Published · cited 11× · 129 F.4th 1129
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SARAH KEY; ANDREW No. 23-3354 WESTLEY; TERESE D.C. No. RUSSELL; CARRA ABERNATHY, 3:17-md-02773- JSC Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware
State v. Keypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1991-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 467 N.W.2d 583; 1991 Iowa App. LEXIS 9; 1991 WL 44580
SACKETT, Judge. On April 16, 1989, a car defendant was driving was stopped by a police officer and a gun was found protruding from under the seat. The car was registered in the name of defendant’s mother. Defendant was charged with unauthorized possession of an offensive weapon in violation of Iowa Code §§ 724.1 and 724.3 (1989). Defendant was also charged with receipt, transportation, and possession of a firearm by a felon in
District Court, W.D. Washington · 1994-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 847 F. Supp. 844; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3845; 1994 WL 102405
ORDER DENYING UNITED STATES’ REQUEST TO GIVE NOTICE OF PERMIT SANCTION ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge. I. BACKGROUND In September of 1991, the United States commenced an in rem civil forfeiture action *846under the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1860, against the vessel Concepcion, contending it h
Washington Supreme Court · 1996-09-12 · Published · cited 53× · 130 Wash. 2d 160; 922 P.2d 59; 1996 Wash. LEXIS 502
Guy, J. — This is a products liability action against the manufacturer of a prescription drug (theophylline) which is used to alleviate symptoms of asthma. In 1979, Plaintiff suffered permanent brain damage as a result of seizures allegedly caused by toxic levels of theophylline in his bloodstream. Plaintiff claims his injuries resulted from the manufacturer’s failure to provide adequate information and warnings to prescribing ph
District Court, D. Delaware · 1997-09-30 · Published · cited 9× · 981 F. Supp. 299; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16046; 1997 WL 640959
981 F.Supp. 299 (1997) KEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HERCON LABORATORIES CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-479-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 30, 1997. *300 *301 *302 Josy W. Ingersoll, James P. Hughes, Jr., Y
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-06-01 · Published · cited 8× · 173 N.E.3d 831; 2021 Ohio 1868
[Cite as Key Realty, Ltd. v. Hall, 2021-Ohio-1868.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Key Realty, Ltd. Court of Appeals No. L-19-1237 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201901132 v. Michael Hall, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT A