Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Robert Lassiter”
Lassiter v. N.C. Baptist Hosps., Inc.public domain
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of August 2015 by Plaintiff to Substitute Counsel: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of August 2015."
ERVIN, Justice. In this case we are required to determine whether defendants North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Incorporated a/k/a North Carolina Baptist Hospital and Wake Forest University Health Sciences (collectively, “defendants NCBH and WFUHS”), and defendants Terry Daniel, M.D. and Dayspring Family Medicine Associates, PLLC (collectively, “defendants Daniel and Dayspring”) we
McCullough, judge. Plaintiff Keen Lassiter as guardian ad litem for Jakari Baize appeals an order granting expert witness fees as costs to defendants Terry Daniel, M.D., and Dayspring Family Medicine Associates, PLLC, pursuant to section 7A-305 of the North Carolina General Statutes. Based on the reasons stated herein, we reverse and remand the orders of the
State v. Lassiterpublic domain
KONENKAMP, Justice. [¶ 1.] In this appeal, we confront the problem of when prior act evidence may be used to show modus operandi or motive in order to prove identity. A man entered the home of Scott Davis and assaulted him. At the time, Davis had a relationship with Brenda Tobin. Defendant, John Las-siter, Tobin’s former boyfriend, was charged with the assault. At trial, defendant denied involvement in the incident and offered a
Robert Herrington v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 316 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-24-554 ROBERT HERRINGTON Opinion Delivered May 21, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00464-CV Daniel James Caldwell, Appellant v. The State of Texas for the Protection of Jennifer Zimmerman, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 22-0072-POC4, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL E. DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM
Lassiter v. Statepublic domain
175 Ga. App. 338 (1985) 333 S.E.2d 412 LASSITER v. THE STATE. 70564. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided July 8, 1985. C. Robert Melton, for appellant. E. Byron Smith, District Attorney, Hugh D. Sosebee, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge. The defendant, John W. Lassit
Asbury MS Gray-Daniels, L.L.C. v. Danielspublic domain
812 F.Supp.2d 771 (2011) ASBURY MS GRAY-DANIELS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; and Asbury Automotive Arkansas, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs v. Noel E. DANIELS, an individual; Joe M. Usry, Jr., an individual; and Usry Enterprises, L.L.C. d/b/a Joe Usry Chrysler Jeep Dodge, a Mississippi corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-28 HTW-LRA. United State
Darden v. Robert G. Lassiter & Co.public domain
Civil action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant. The evidence tends to show that on 29 December, 1927, plaintiff's intestate, Evan Powell, was in the employ of the defendant, working in a trench or ditch cut along Mercer Street in the town of Wilson, preparatory to laying therein sewer or water mains. The trench in question was cut by a ditching machine to approximately the requ
State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr.public domain
APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I readily concur in the majority’s discussion of exigent circumstances. I dissent, however, on the issue of consent to search. Certainly we all recognize that the home is entitled to special protection under the Fourth Amendment. This special protection of the home has been repeatedly emphasized by
Roe v. Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
637 F.Supp.2d 995 (2009) Donald B. ROE, Personal Representative of the Estate of Socorro Mejia, deceased, Plaintiff, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and Michelin Americas Research & Development Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08cv837-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 28, 2009. *997
United States v. Daniel L. Leepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2389 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the E
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00311-CV Robert K. Trethewey and Shirley J. Trethewey, Appellants v.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00311-CV Robert K. Trethewey and Shirley J. Trethewey, Appellants v. Suzy Collins, et al., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2006-0613B, HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI
United States v. Leepublic domain
89 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2000) UNITED STATES of America v. Daniel Lewis LEE, a/k/a Daniel Lewis Graham, D.L. Graham, and Danny Lee. No. LR-CR-97-243(2). United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. March 21, 2000. *1018 Dan Stripling, Robert A. De La Cruz, U.S. Atty.'s Office, E.D. Ark., Little Rock, AR, for U.S.
Tammie J.C. v. Robert T.R.public domain
DIANE S. SYKES, J. ¶ 74. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that the due process personal jurisdiction prerequisite of "minimum contacts" with the forum state pursuant to International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945), is not applicable in termination of parental rights cases. Majority op., ¶ 37. The majority reaches this conclusion by characterizing termination of parent
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Daniel Lewis Lee of conspiring to violate and violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d), and of three murders in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959. The jury also returned a verdict of death and a death sentence was imposed. Lee moved successfully' for a new
Jones v. Abrahampublic domain
15 S.W.3d 310 (2000) 341 Ark. 66 Julia D. JONES, Joseph H. Klerekoper, and Jean W. Mallett v. Fairfax ABRAHAM, Jr., Henry Abraham, Martha Abraham, Charles Abraham, Sarah D. Karney, Jeanette D. Stucke, Frances G. Elola, John T. Abraham, Julia D. Shepard, Ruth A. Seymour, and William T. Abraham. No. 99-1217. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 13, 2000.
Glazer v. Pasternakpublic domain
693 A.2d 319 (1997) Malcom I. GLAZER, Avram A. Glazer, Ronald C. Lassiter, Robert V. Leffler, W. George Loar and Zapata Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Arnold PASTERNAK, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 426/431, 1996. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 11, 1997. Decided: May 5, 1997. *320 All
Jones v. Abrahampublic domain
999 S.W.2d 698 (1999) 67 Ark.App. 304 Julia D. JONES, Joseph H. Klerekoper, and Jean W. Mallet, v. Fairfax ABRAHAM, Jr., Henry Abraham, Martha Abraham, Charles Abraham, Sarah D. Karney, Jeanette D. Stucke, Frances G. Elola, John T. Abraham, Julia D. Shepard, Ruth A. Seymour, and William T. Abraham. No. CA 98-1076. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III.