Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 9, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1682 Lower Tribunal No. F09-1244 ________________ Daniel Joseph Quigley, Appellant,

Opinion of the Court by Kruger, J. *802 The Government Claims Act ( Gov. Code, § 810 et seq. ) authorizes plaintiffs to bring certain tort claims against public entities, while also immunizing public entities from liability in particular circumstances. One of the act's immunity provisions b

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by the defendant Daniel Quigley from a probation order requiring him to pay restitution in the amount of $6,439.50 as a condition of probation, entered upon a nolo contendere plea to grand theft of an airboat. The restitution was ordered to compensate the owner of the airboat for the near-total damage to the airboat caused by the defendant during the commission of the subject theft. We affirm.

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge. James Quigley, pro se, appeals from the dismissal of his legal malpractice action for lack of prosecution. Stephen Johnson cross-appeals and contends that the trial court erred in finding that the amended complaint was properly verified. We reverse the dismissal and affirm as to the cross-appeal. Quigley filed an amended complaint alleging legal malpractice, fraudulent misrepresentation

OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary Lisa Reynolds appeals the trial court’s order requiring her to vacate her apartment. We reverse. Issue Reynolds raises four issues. We address one dispositive issue, which we restate as whether Reynolds was denied due process when the trial cour

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, United States District Judge *287This case concerns a tragic series of events that ended with the loss of Tyjuan Hill's life. On September 20, 2012, Mr. Hill was shot and killed by Patrick Quigley, a Sergeant in the New York Police Department. Sgt. Quigley ("Defendant") maintains that his use of force was legally justified because he had probable c

798 F.Supp. 451 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David James QUIGLEY and Michael Kelly Holdridge, Defendants. File No. 1:91:CR:146. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan. June 14, 1992. *452 Donald Daniels, Asst. U.S. Atty., and John A. Smietanka, U.S. Atty., Grand Rapids, Mich., for plaintiff. Robert F

Opinion of the Court CRAWFORD, Judge: Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officers of committing indecent acts on a child, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, total *346forfeit

816 F.Supp. 1217 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David James QUIGLEY, Defendant. No. 1:91:CR:146-02. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan. March 19, 1993. *1218 Timothy I. Miner, Grand Rapids, MI, for defendant. Donald Daniels, John A. Smietanka, U.S. Atty., Grand Rapids, MI, for plaintiff.

Matter of Quigley v Village of E. Aurora (2021 NY Slip Op 01174) Matter of Quigley v Village of E. Aurora 2021 NY Slip Op 01174 Decided on February 25, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York Sta

346 B.R. 647 (2006) In re QUIGLEY COMPANY, Inc., Debtor. No. 04-15739. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. August 9, 2006. *648 Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP (Michael L. Cook, Esq., Lawrence V. Gelber, Esq., Of Counsel), New York, NY, for the Debtor. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (Bruce R. Zirinsky, Esq., John H.

Quigley v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. (2018 NY Slip Op 08577) Quigley v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2018 NY Slip Op 08577 Decided on December 13, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Tom, J., J.

Memorandum. Appellants’ convictions for conspiracy in the third degree must be affirmed. The motion to dismiss the *915defective indictment of which they complain was not "made prior to * * * commencement of trial” and so the lower courts acted within their discretion in refusing to consider it (CPL 210.20; subd 2). Moreover, while the indictment did specify as underlying counts to the conspiracy c

437 B.R. 102 (2010) In re QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., Debtors. No. 04-15739 (SMB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. September 8, 2010. *110 Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Michael L. Cook, Esq., Lawrence V. Gelber, Esq., Of Counsel, New York, NY, Attorneys for the Debtor. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Bruce R. Zirinsky, Esq., Joh

Supreme Court No. 2023-299-Appeal. (P 20-910) Ana Varela : v. : Daniel M. Monteiro. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefit Street, Providence,

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Dorothy Quigley appeals from a judgment sentencing her to twenty-seven months’ imprisonment. Her sole argument on appeal is that the district judge improperly enhanced her offense level by four levels pursuant to the “organizer or leader” role enhancement under § 3Bl.l(a) of

ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Dennis Massengail and Gina Massengail’s (collectively, “the Massengails”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) seeking to set aside a tax sale. Third-Party Defendants United States of America (“United States”) and The O’Brien Law Firm Co., L.P.A., Inc. (“The O’Brien Law Firm

2018 WI 16 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2506-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel J. H. Bartelt, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

2018 WI 16 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2506-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel J. H. Bartelt, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS

ME. JUSTICE CASTLES delivered the Opinion of the Court. This is an appeal by Clifford Graveley, and others, petitioners below, hereinafter referred to as appellants, from an order of the district judge, the Honorable Philip C. Duncan, dissolving a temporary injunction and giving final judgment for the defendants, Clifford and Esther Quigley. The action was commenced in the district court of t