⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Daniel Michael Berry”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-08-13 · Published · cited 1× · 147 So. 3d 270; 2014 WL 3933029; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1971
MOORE, J. LThe State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation & Development (“DOTD”), appeals a judgment assigning permanent total disability (“PTD”) to the claimant, James “Mike” Berry. We affirm. Factual Background Berry was employed as a laborer by DOTD. At the time of his injury in March 1986, his average weekly wage was $856.25, yielding a workers’ comp ra
Berry v. Astruepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-09-22 · Published · cited 411× · 622 F.3d 1228; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19659; 2010 WL 3665151
622 F.3d 1228 (2010) Daniel BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-35421. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed September 22, 2010. Argued and Submitted March 5, 2010. *1230 Charles W. Talbot, Tacoma, WA, for the appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-07-25 · Published · cited 36× · 863 F.3d 1084; 2017 WL 3136922; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13372
PER CURIAM. Over a period of years Matthew Akins had numerous encounters' with police officers in Columbia, Missouri, and in 2015 Akins filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants are five police officers, three prosecutors, the city of Columbia, and Boone County (collectively the defendants). Akins alleges numerous violations of his constitutional rights arising
Berry v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007-02-22 · Published · cited 10× · 214 S.W.3d 413; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 306; 2007 WL 529753
214 S.W.3d 413 (2007) Michael Wayne BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. 27698. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. February 22, 2007. *415 Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. and Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for respondent. D
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-12-23 · Published · cited 1× · 182 So. 3d 1252; 15 La.App. 5 Cir. 414; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 2680; 2015 WL 9436179
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. ^Plaintiffs, Thelma, and Richard Berry, appeal a judgment in favor of defendant, the Parish of Jefferson, finding that the Parish’s action in calling for a zoning and land use study of a 23-acre area in Terry-town, Louisiana, that included the Berrys’ immovable property, which ultimately resulted in rezoning of the'Berrys’ property, was not arbitrary and capricious, and thus did'not constitute ¿'reg
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 64 So. 3d 347; 10 La.App. 5 Cir. 832; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 487; 2011 WL 1565967
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | ¡^Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Berry (“the Berrys”), appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, the Parish of Jefferson (“the Parish”), dismissing their claim for damages and other relief stemming from the alleged arbitrary and capricious re-zoning of their property by the Parish, as well as the imposition of a building moratorium by the Parish. After thorough cons
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-06-12 · Published · cited 43× · 927 F.3d 169
QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge: On November 19, 2013, Bertha Small ingested prescription medications that were sent to her by mistake. Ms. Small was accustomed to receiving medications in the mail. On the day she ingested the pills, Ms. Small received a package addressed to her home in North Carolina that contained six prescription medications. The package was similar in size
Berry v. Kerikpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 237 F. Supp. 2d 450; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26187; 2002 WL 31859529
237 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002) Joseph BERRY, Plaintiff, v. Bernard B. KERIK, et al, Defendants. No. 00 CIV.2834. United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 27, 2002. Joseph Berry, Attica, NY, Pro se. Michael D. Hess, Esq., Daniel R. Ryan, Esq., Corporation Counsel of the City of NY, New York City, for Defendants. ORDER BERM
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-06-10 · Published · cited 205× · 491 S.W.3d 699; 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1080; 182 Oil & Gas Rep. 832; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 480; 2016 WL 3212999
JUSTICE GUZMAN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this trade-secret misappropriation case, a jury found an oil-and-gas operator misused proprietary information acquired under a confidentiality agreement and profited handsomely from its use. The trade secrets at issue purported to identify ten localized areas in East Texas oil-and-gas formations offering optimized production from both a relatively untapped
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2009-11-19 · Published · cited 6× · 419 B.R. 833; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3782; 2009 WL 4186743
419 B.R. 833 (2009) In re 7677 EAST BERRY AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Debtors. Nos. 09-27906, 09-27901, 09-28000. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. November 19, 2009. *837 Daniel J. Garfield, Michael J. Pankow, Denver, CO, for Debtors. ORDER MICHAEL E. ROMERO, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter i
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005-07-21 · Published · cited 6× · 406 F. Supp. 2d 874; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14843; 2005 WL 1766376
406 F.Supp.2d 874 (2005) SASSY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Donald P. BERRY, Sr., Defendant. No. 04 C 7219. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 21, 2005. *875 Richard Daniel Harris, Jordan Herzog, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Michael J. Abernathy, Wendy J. Sawyer, Bell Boyd &am;
Berry v. Statepublic domain
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 29× · 2004 WY 81; 93 P.3d 222; 2004 Wyo. LEXIS 106; 2004 WL 1514968
2004 WY 81 STEPHEN BERRY, Appellant (Defendant), v. THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 03-114 Supreme Court of Wyoming. APRIL TERM, A.D. 2004. July 8, 2004 Representing Appellant: Ken Koski, State Public Defender, PDP; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; Diane Courselle, Director DAP; Kristen Cunningham, Intern DAP; K. Adam Christian, Jr., Intern DAP.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-12-04 · Published · cited 101× · 807 F.3d 600
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge HAZEL joined. HARRIS, Circuit Judge: The class action settlement at issue in this appeal is “the culmination of years of litigation and negotiations” between class counsel and the defendants, LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.; Seisint, Inc.; and
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 808 So. 2d 594; 2000 La.App. 1 Cir. 0809; 2001 La. App. LEXIS 965; 2001 WL 498974
1 .PETTIGREW, J. Claimant appeals from an order dismissing a claim against her employer for her failure to submit to an independent medical examination. For the reasons assigned, we reverse and remand. iS, FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 10, 1993, claimant, Melissa C. Berry, was injured while in the course and scope of her employment with Copeland’s Restaurant. Initially, Copeland
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-05-19 · Published · cited 3× · 888 N.E.2d 740; 382 Ill. App. 3d 895
888 N.E.2d 740 (2008) Linnie Kathryn BERRY, on Her Own Behalf and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Howard L. Berry, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., American Water Works Service Company, Inc., Arkla Industries, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, G.W. Berkheimer Company, Inc., Industrial Contractors, Inc., John Crane, Inc., Lennox Industries, Inc., Marathon Oil Company, Sealing Equipment Products Company,
Daniel v. Cantrellpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003-01-03 · Published · cited 2× · 241 F. Supp. 2d 867; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1185; 2003 WL 172589
241 F.Supp.2d 867 (2003) Alden Joe DANIEL, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Ellie M. CANTRELL; Michael Cantrell; Lee Ann Stabler; Tim Taylor and Fantasy World; John Doe # 1, representative of and Prime Star; John Doe # 2, representative of and G & M Market; Roger E. Jenne, Attorney; Jerry N. Estes, District Attorney General; Joseph Victor Hoffer, Assistant District Attorney; Stephen Davis Crump, Assistant District Attorney of Bradley County D.A.'s Office;
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 29× · 172 A.3d 1
OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: Appellant, Keith Lamont Berry, appeals from the Judgment of Sentence entered by the Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas following his convictions after a jury trial of Robbery, Theft by Unlawful Taking, Receiving Stolen Property, and two counts of Simple Assault. 1 After carefu
Berry v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 263 Ga. 171; 430 S.E.2d 764; 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 2042; 1993 Ga. LEXIS 482
Hunt, Presiding Justice. Francis Anita Berry killed Curtis Thompson by stabbing him through the heart with a kitchen knife. She was convicted of felony murder and possession of a knife during the commission of a crime, and sentenced to life imprisonment plus a term of five years.1 She appeals and we affirm. 1. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jur
People v. Berrypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1993-07-21 · Published · cited 7× · 17 Cal. App. 4th 332; 21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 299; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5547; 93 Daily Journal DAR 9403; 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 754
17 Cal.App.4th 332 (1993) 21 Cal. Rptr.2d 299 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL BERRY, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B067093. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. July 21, 1993. *333 COUNSEL Janyce Keiko Imata Blair, under appointment by the Court of A
Fuentes v. Berrypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1995-10-16 · Published · cited 23× · 38 Cal. App. 4th 1800; 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 848; 95 Daily Journal DAR 13929; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8127; 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1001
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1802 OPINION Appellants Heriberto Fuentes, Jr., Robert R. Villa, and Ronald R. Jones, police officers employed by the City of Alameda (appellants or the officers), brought an action for malicious institution of a civil proceeding (commonly referred to as "malicious prosecution") against responde