Cases

JUSTICE GOULD, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 We hold that Arizona's automatic assignment provision in A.R.S. § 23-1023(B) does not apply when an employee receives workers' compensation benefits under another state's laws. Rather, the law of the state in which an employee's workers' compensation is paid determines the assignment rights of the employer and employee.

FINE, J. ¶ 1. Rachelle R. Jackson appeals the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation dismissing her complaint against it. Jackson is a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff. She sued Wisconsin County Mutual, contending that she was an insured under the policy issued to her employer Milwaukee County, and that she therefore had underinsured-motorist coverage under it when an underinsure

N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶ 1. This case concerns Rachelle Jackson, a Milwaukee County sheriffs deputy who seeks coverage under her employer's underinsured motorist policy. The policy pays sums owed by an underinsured tortfeasor to an insured person who is injured while "using an automobile within the scope of his or her employment or authority." The policy defines "using" by saying it

JUSTICE LUND delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a weapon by a person in custody of a Department of Corrections (DOC) facility, pursuant to section 24 — 1.1(b) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 24 — 1.1(b)). Subsequently, the Livingston County court sentenced defendant to a Class X sentence of 20

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases concern the efforts of Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to cope with a complex problem: air pollution emitted in one State, but causing harm in other States. Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

07/12/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 3, 2022 Session LORI ALBERS ET AL. V. RICHARD POWERS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 78219 Darrell Scarlett, Judge No. M2021-00577-COA-R3-CV This

ACCEPTED 15-24-00118-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00039-CV Michael Garrett, M. D. and Kristin Held, M.D., Appellants v. The Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Ian Shaw, Bradley Miller, Donnie Lewis, Jenny Yoakum, Rick Fernandez, Daniel Guerrero, Lori Henke, Donna Montemayor, Julie Spier, Rick Tisch, and Suzette Tijerina, in their Official Capacities as members of the St

106 N.J. 557 (1987) 525 A.2d 287 ROBERT AYERS AND MAE AYERS; WARREN J. ADELUNG, JR., CHERYL ADELUNG, AND JILL ADELUNG, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, WARREN J. ADELUNG, JR.; CHRIS BARALUS, JOYCE BARALUS, AND STELLA BARALUS; JOHN BORTOLOMETTI, MARTHA BORTOLOMETTI, AND ADAM BORTOLOMETTI, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN BORTOLOMETTI; CARL L. BATTAGLIA, DENISE BATTAGLIA, AND SHERRY ANN AND JOSEPH PETER BATTAGLIA, BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Lori L. Peterson was injured in a car accident while driving a loaner vehicle from Billion Empire Motors, Inc. Peterson sued Travelers, 2 Billion’s insurer, for coverage under the commercial insurance policy. The district court 3 dismis

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUSAN LATTA; TRACI EHLERS; LORI No. 14-35420 WATSEN; SHARENE WATSEN; SHELIA ROBERTSON; ANDREA D.C. No. ALTMAYER; AMBER BEIERLE; 1:13-cv-00482- RACHAEL ROBERTSON, CWD Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. C. L. OTTER, “Butch”; Governor of the State of Idaho, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appel

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Mark Jackson (“Jackson”) appeals from several orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania imposing Rule 11 sanctions; denying his motion to disqualify the main defendant’s counsel; dismissing -with prejudice claims as a sanction; denying his motion for a preliminary injunction; and denying his motion to vacate the referenc

308 F.3d 1233 Donald O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, andBenjamin M. Aban, Donald N. Adaniya, Rolando R. Alvarado, Joseph A. Alvitre, Larry Andrews, Jeannett Armstrong, Robert G. Ashmore, Lee E. Austin, David K. Bahl, Lawrence R. Barron, Kenneth R. Battle, Jeanette Binion, Royce Binion, Eleanor M. Bishop, Gaetane M. Boutin, Thomas R. Boyden, Deena J. Bradshaw, Shadrach Breaux, Stephen G. Broich, Michael C. Brown, Yulanda S. Brown, David S. Buchana

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Mark Jackson (“Jackson”) appeals from several orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania imposing Rule 11 sanctions; denying his motion to disqualify the main defendant’s counsel; dismissing -with prejudice claims as a sanction; denying his motion for a preliminary injunction; and denying his motion to vacate the referenc

The opinion of the court was delivered by JOHNSON, J.: Jerome S. Tilzer, individually and as plaintiff ad litem for Rita Tilzer, Todd A. Tilzer, and Jill Jokelson (hereafter collectively referred to as Tilzers) appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Grant L. Davis and Davis, Bethune & Jones, LLC (hereafter collectively referred to as Davis), in this legal malpractice action. Til

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting. {¶ 18} I respectfully dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. I believe that the claimant is entitled to temporary total disability compensation because his back surgery resulted in a functional change in his medical condition that again caused temporary and total disability (“TTD”). The surgery was related to his allowed back condition and constituted a

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I