Cases

Sack, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two state-law questions that neither this Court nor New York's courts have addressed: (1) whether New York law recognizes "cross-jurisdictional class action tolling," i.e., tolling of a New York statute of limitations by the pendency of a class action in another jurisdiction; and (2) whether a non-merits dismissal of class certification can term

[Cite as Airtron, Inc. v. Tobias, 2021-Ohio-2213.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY AIRTRON, INC. : : Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- : Appellate Case Nos. 29012 & 29019 Appellant :

[Cite as State v. Tobias, 2021-Ohio-3032.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110110 v. : JEFFREY TOBIAS, :

People v Tobias S. (2021 NY Slip Op 06261) People v Tobias S. 2021 NY Slip Op 06261 Decided on November 12, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

People v Tobias S. (2021 NY Slip Op 06260) People v Tobias S. 2021 NY Slip Op 06260 Decided on November 12, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1502 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOBIAS DIGGS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1502 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOBIAS DIGGS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

[Cite as State ex rel. Tobias v. Fuerst, 2022-Ohio-3556.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL. JEFFREY TOBIAS, : Relator, : v. : No. 111836 JUDGE NANCY FUERST, :

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1502 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOBIAS DIGGS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1502 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOBIAS DIGGS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 22, 2024 Decided July 15, 2025 No. 23-5288 TOBIAS JONES, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ART TOBIAS, No. 18-56360 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-01076- DSF-AS MICHAEL ARTEAGA; JEFF CORTINA; J. MOTTO; JULIAN PERE, Defendants-Appellants.

18-1120-cv Tobias Bermudez Chavez, et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 (Argued: March 4, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2021) Docket No. 18-1120-cv TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, GERARDO ANTONIO FONESCA TORRES, FRANKLIN GUILLEN SALAZAR, GARCIA MONTES JOSE GABINO, MARIANO DE LOS ANGELES PIZARRO, ANTONIO OSORN

TOBIAS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. I respectfully concur in part, finding like the majority that the trial court did not err in granting Guilford’s motion for summary judgment. I respectfully dissent in part from the majority’s finding that the trial court erred in granting Reavis’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Fluor’s claims again

WETTICK JR., J, OPINION AND ORDERS OF COURT /. BACKGROUND Defendants’ preliminary objections seeking dismissal of plaintiff’s amended complaint are the subject of this opinion and order of court. In this litigation at GD09-016892, plaintiff purchased eight mortgage-backed security certificates issued by five separate trusts between May 2006 and December 2007. The

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL MIKE CHAVEZ, No. 18-36083 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:11-cv-03025-AA DAVID R. ROBINSON; LISA MOORE, OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL STAHL and LORENA STAHL, Appellants, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, Successor in interest to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., As trustee for BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-SD1, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-SD1,

MADELEINE M. LANDRIEU, Judge. |gThe State of Louisiana appeals the district court’s ruling setting aside a judgment of bond forfeiture upon the motion of the commercial surety, Bankers Insurance Company .(“Bankers”). . For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW On July 12, 2014, the defendant, Daniel Nix, was arrested for disturbing the peace and resisting an o

492 F.Supp. 390 (1980) Daniel ST. J. ENRIQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. TRANSIT MIXED CONCRETE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CV 74-1755-AAH. United States District Court, C. D. California. June 26, 1980. *391 Alvin S. Tobias, Manhattan Beach, Cal., for plaintiff. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant. <

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. 1, Denis J. Dwyer (“Dwyer”), the plaintiff/appellant, appeals a judgment that dismissed his lawsuit against the defendants/appellees, (a) David A. Binegar (“Binegar”); (b) Binegar Christian, L.L.C.; (c) Bryan C. Reuter (“Reuter”); (d) Stanley, Flanagan and Reuter, L.L.C., (hereinafter the “defendant lawyers”); (e) CNA Insurance Company (“CNA”); and (f) Westport Insurance Corporation. After reviewing