Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 377A14 Filed 18 December 2015 MARIA ALVAREZ, MOLLY BAILEY-GOGA, JOHN BARTON, PAMELA BARTON, BONNIE BARY, THOMAS BARY, CAROL BIDDINGTON, WILLIAM BIDDINGTON, MARTIN BOCOCK, JR., NATHANIEL BOCOCK, CRAIG BRIGHAM, NANCY BRIGHAM, JOANN BUZEK, JOHN BUZEK, ROGER CARNIE, DIANE COUSINS, JOHN COUSINS, DANIEL D’ALESSANDRO, KELLY D’ALESSANDRO, PATRICIA DEMATTIA, DIANA FAIC

This is a suit for damages on account of an alleged malicious prosecution of the apppellee Newell Kisner on a charge of criminal trespass instituted on December 28, 1940, by the filing of an affidavit signed by the appellant S.F. Jacobs, and the arrest and imprisonment of the appellee in pursuance thereof, while the affiant Jacobs was employed as a plantation rider or submanager on the "Little Ashland Plantation" in Leflore County, owned by the appellant W.P. Brown, but which plantation, the

OPINION BY KLEIN, J.: ¶ 1 Nicholas Pelleechia appeals from his judgment of sentence for criminal trespass. On appeal he claims that because the Commonwealth’s bill of information only charged him with criminal trespass as a second-degree felony (F — 2), the trial court erred in convicting him of the same crime graded as a third-degree felony (F-3). Specifically, Pelleechia claims that 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3503(a)(l

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,764 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TOMMY L. JONES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A district court's decision to admit or exclude evidence under K.S.A. 2020

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE Anne King believed that her ex-husband, Corey King, was not doing his fair share in the care of their children. Frustrated, she vented on Facebook. Doc. 13 ¶ 14. That post led to her arrest. Ms. King alleges that her ex-husband and his friend, Trey Burgamy, were responsible for her unconstitutional arrest and thus she filed this action alleging claims pursuant to

661 F.3d 232 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter BERNEGGER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-60932. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 20, 2011. *234 Clyde McGee, IV, Robert J. Mims (argued), Asst. U.S. Attys., Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Merrida P. Coxwell, Jr. (argued), Ch

PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in Amesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc., _ N.C. _, S.E.2d (2015) (375A14), the decision of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. Justice EDMUNDS concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons stated in his opinion in Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club & Plantation, Inc., N.C. _, S.E.2d _ (2015) (375A14).

Malik Mungo v. State of Maryland, No. 1658, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Graeff, J. CRIMINAL VENUE — WAIVER OF MANDATORY MOTION — CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION STATUTE — PARTICIPATION IN A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION THAT RESULTS IN DEATH — PLAIN ERROR REVIEW A claim of improper venue is waived if it is not timely filed unless the court finds good cause to excuse the late filing. In this case, defense counsel did not give any reason for failing to file a timely motion, and counsel did not suggest there

512 F.Supp. 936 (1981) SERLIN WINE AND SPIRIT MERCHANTS, INC. (Derby), Michael Kisner, Permittee; Serlin Wine and Spirit Merchants, Inc. (State Street, Bridgeport), Miguel Torres, Permittee; Wine Merchants Ltd. (Orange), Peter Kish, Permittee; Wine Merchants Ltd. (Broad Street, Bridgeport), Alan Rapkin, Permittee; Serlin Corporation (Fairfield), Kenneth Anton, Permittee; Serlin Corporation (Guilford), Charles Weber, Permittee; A & P Package Store, Da

789 A.2d 708 (2001) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Jerome PASSARELLI, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 16, 2001. Filed December 28, 2001. *710 Albert J. Flora, Wilkes-Barre, for appellant. Gerald F. Idec, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tunkhannock, for Com., appellee. Before: CAVANAUGH, MUSMA

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Cii'cuit Judge GARLAND. BROWN, Circuit Judge: FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx”), a company that provides small package delivery throughout the country, seeks review of the determination of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) that FedEx committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00368-CV Jos Santy, Willie Van Runxt and Christian Wanner, (1) Appellants

Patricia M. Richardson has appealed a dismissal of her complaint against APAC-Mississippi, Inc. (APAC), on a summary judgment adjudication that one Berg McCandless, doing business as "B P Trucking Co.," was an independent contractor, and not an employee of APAC at the time of the accident over which this action arose. We affirm the summary judgment dismissal on the *Page 144 ground that McCandless was an independent contractor. The circuit

735 F.Supp. 1311 (1990) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for San Marino Savings and Loan Association v. QUALITY INNS, INC., et al. Civ. No. Y-86-1866. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 26, 1990. *1312 Daniel M. Litt, Michael H. Krimminger, Esquire, Pamela L. Sherman and John David Ferrer, Washingt

923 F.Supp. 1322 (1996) George W. WAYMAN, Dale Stanislaus, Jess C. Smith, Arlin "Bud" F. Roat, Brad Rhodes, Charlie Reid, John Reents, James L. McKown, Thomas McClernon, Donald B. Howell, Buddy R. Hill, Robert Henderson, Robert C. Conner, Harold Clarke, and Troy M. Botkin, Plaintiffs, v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, a Maryland Corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 91-1451-MLB. United States District Court, D.

*440Levin, J. (dissenting). This is an action for malicious prosecution. I write separately because (1) this Court should not decide — even if the question of probable cause is, in the instant case, solely for a court to decide as a question of law — whether there was probable cause until after the trial court and the Court of

Gerrard, J. I. INTRODUCTION The Legislature, in 1988, mandated that “[c]orporal punishment shall be prohibited in public schools.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-295 (Reissue 1996). In die context of a disputed teacher-discipline case, we must determine whether “corporal punishment” is a term that is commonly used and understood, such that a person of ordinary sensibilities and intelligence should be capable of ascert

588 N.W.2d 813 (1999) 256 Neb. 73 Robert L. DAILY, appellee, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MORRILL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 62-0063, also known as School District of Bridgeport, appellant. No. S-97-933. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 5, 1999. *816 Richard A. Douglas, of Nichols, Douglas, Kelly, and Meade

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge. On August 5, 2011, PlaintiffiCounterDefendant John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Wiley”), commenced this action against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff DRK Photo (“Defendant” or “DRK”) under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, seeking a declaration that Wiley had not infringed the copyrights on certain stock photographs tha

Blair Moody, Jr., J. (dissenting in part). I agree with the analysis employed and the result reached by the opinion of the Court, except for part IV which deals with a cause of action for malicious prosecution of civil proceedings. The opinion of the majority holds that a claim for malicious prosecution may not be asserted in the absence of the element of