Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel J Emmett and Sheila S Emmett”
Kilgore Independent School District v. Darlene Axberg, John Claude Axberg, Sheila Anderson, and the State of Texaspublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss On June 29, 2015, the Board of Trustees of Kilgore Independent School District (KISD) voted to repeal KISD’s local option homestead exemption (LOHE). That repeal came just fourteen days after Governor Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill No. 1 (SB1), which (A
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. Board of Equalizationpublic domain
Opinion HUMES, P. J. Appellants Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Wirelessco, L.P., Nextel of California, Inc., and Nextel Boost of California, LLC (collectively referred to as Sprint or the company), filed this action seeking a refund on taxes they paid on property assessed by respondent Board of Equalization (the Board). The Legislature has mandated that for a telephone company to file such a
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Sprint Telephony v. State Board of Equalizationpublic domain
Filed 7/16/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A140540 v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et (San Francisco County al.,
Sprint Telephony v. State Board of Equalizationpublic domain
Filed 8/14/15 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A140540 v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et (San Francisco County al
Household Bank v. JFS GROUPpublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
186 B.R. 561 (1995) In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTV Corporation, et al., Debtors. LTV AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE COMPANY, Vought Industries, Inc. and Vought International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. THOMSON-CSF, S.A. and VT Missile Company, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. The LTV CORPORATION, LTV Aerospace and Defense Company, Vought Industries, Inc. and Vought International, Inc., Counterclaim Defendants.
ACCEPTED 04-15-00534-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/18/2015 4:46:17 PM
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Ex Parte Edwardspublic domain
Because I believe the trial judge did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant, I must respectfully dissent. Punishing a defendant for unintentionally causing the death of another while in the commission of a misdemeanor is not a new legal concept, in either a criminal case or a civil case. For example, in Pippin v. State,19 Ala. App. 384, 387, 97 So. 615<
Ashley v. Abbott Laboratoriespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Personal Jurisdiction WEINSTEIN, District Judge: *557TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.557 II. FACTS.558 A. Background.558 B. Present Actions.559 C. Motions.559 III. NEW YORK SUBSTANTIVE LAW AND RULES A
Dept. of Cent. Management Services v. Ilrbpublic domain
959 N.E.2d 114 (2011) 355 Ill. Dec. 86 The DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Petitioner, v. The ILLINOIS LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, STATE PANEL; Jackie Zimmerman, Michael Coli, Michael Hade, and Albert Washington, the Members of Said Board and Panel in Their Official Capacity Only; John Brosnan, in His Official Capacity Only as Illinois Labor Relations Board Executive Director; Administrative Law Judge Colleen Harvey,
Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.public domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Individuals injured by the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (“Murrah Building”) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, filed suit against the manufacturers of the ammonium nitrate allegedly used to create the bomb. The plaintiffs’ complaint set forth theories of negligence, negligence per se, negligent entrustment, ne
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Rodriguez v. Harris Countypublic domain
ORDER VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge. In this case, Plaintiffs Edward Gonzalez, Orlando Ybarra, Patricia Gonzales, Reynaldo Guerra, Sandra Puente, Thomas Berg, and James Rodriguez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) challenge the legality of the redistricting plan adopted by the Harris County Commissioner’s Court on August 9, 2011, known as Revised Plan A-l, which reapportions voters among Harris
Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosivespublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-3157 Patrick J. Fisher, Jr. Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk