Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT OCEAN RIDGE CHIROPRACTIC INC., a/a/o GEORGE SPIRES, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D21-293 [August 12, 2021] Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Regina

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

CIKLIN, J. Peter Torocsik appeals the order denying his motion for summary judgment and entering summary judgment for HSBC, et al. (“the Bank”), on Torocsik’s suit for damages related to a dishonored cashier’s check. We reverse. In 2008, Torocsik was the seller of his restaurant and entered into a stock purchase agreement contract with Matthew Weaver and

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1185 Lower Tribunal No. 12-12544 SP ________________ Affiliated Healthcare Centers, Inc., a/a/o Julio Paez,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-3834 _____________________________ SENATOR RAY RODRIGUES, SENATOR AARON BEAN, SENATOR JENNIFER BRADLEY, SPEAKER CHRIS SPROWLS, REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS LEEK, REPRESENTATIVE TYLER SIROIS, MATHEW BAHL, LEDA KELLY, et al., Appellants, v. BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, INC., et al., Appellees.

632 F.Supp.2d 1147 (2008) SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP., Plaintiff, v. The TAG COMPANY US, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 06-81105-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. December 19, 2008. *1154 Stephen Bernard Gillman, Shutts & Bowen, Miami, FL, Mark L. Levine, Mark S. Ouweleen, Sean Gallagher, Shayna S. Cook,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-4622 _____________________________ L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Florida Department of Management Services. Erin Rock, Secretary.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO CENTER & RESEARCH FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND INSTITUTE HOSPITAL, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D16-5536 v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. _____________________________/ O

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-1139 _____________________________ NINJA ACADEMY, INC. d/b/a CHAMPIONS UNITE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF FOOD, NUTRITION, AND WELLNESS, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Co

PER CURIAM. Before us in these consolidated appeals are final orders the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) entered in section 120.57(1) proceedings, after an Administrative Law Judge in the Division of Administrative Hearings had remanded the cases to the Agency, and appellants had withdrawn their petitions for formal hearing. Our jurisdiction to entertain an administrative appeal from a final

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-1139 _____________________________ NINJA ACADEMY, INC. d/b/a CHAMPIONS UNITE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF FOOD, NUTRITION, AND WELLNESS, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Co

FEW, C.J. This appeal involves section 29-7-10 of the South Carolina Code (2007), and whether the section created a first lien on money paid to a contractor when (1) the laborers claiming the lien did not work for the contractor, but for its subcontractor, and (2) the funds to which the lien would attach were held in escrow by court order instead of paid directly to the contractor. A special referee granted summary judgment ba

BILBREY, J. Sixty-seven Petitioners sought administrative hearings ■ pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2016), after the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) announced its-rates ;of reimbursement of Medicaid funds for services provided by hospitals for outpatient services for the 2016-2017 fiscal year. ACHA initially sought to dismiss the petitions as premature. Thereafter, AHC

OPINION OF THE COURT Becker, Circuit Judge. This is an underinsured motorist (UM) case governed by Pennsylvania law. The appeal arises out of an action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by plaintiffs George and Evangelina Jumara seeking to appoint arbitrators and to compel arbitration by their own carrier, defendant State Farm Insurance Company. Ultimately,

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-2150 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: RIGHTS OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY CHOICE. ____________ No. SC16-12 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: RIGHTS OF ELECTRIC

659 F.Supp.2d 1240 (2009) George DURGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Antonio P. MON et al., Defendants. Case No.: 06-61844-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 21, 2009. *1244 Kevin Bruce Love, Criden & Love PA, South Miami, FL, Patrick V. Dahlstrom, Pomera

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC19-1336 ____________ WILSONART, LLC, et al., Petitioners, vs. MIGUEL LOPEZ, etc., Respondent. December 31, 2020 MUÑIZ, J. In the decision

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before the Court is the motion for class certification of common issues of Representative Plaintiffs Michael S. Johnson, Donna Dymkowski, Patricia Long-Correa, Antonio Samuel, and Angelette Waters. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Leeds, Morelli & Brown, P.C. (“LMB”) committed, and Defendant Nextel Communications, Inc. (“Nextel”)

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC19-328 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: RIGHT TO COMPETITIVE ENERGY MARKET FOR CUSTOMERS OF INVESTOR-OWNED UTILITIES; ALLOWING ENERGY CHOICE January 9, 2020 PER CURIAM. The Attorney General of Florida has requested this Court’s opinion as to the validity

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC19-1266 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: PROHIBITS POSSESSION OF DEFINED ASSAULT WEAPONS. June 4, 2020 PER CURIAM. The Attorney General of Florida has requested this Court’s opinion as to the validity of a citizen initiative petition circulated pursua