Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 6, 2023 NO. 03-22-00004-CV Rockwall Ranch Property Owners Association, Appellant v. Joseph Gonzales, Daniel Estrada, and Jerry Werlla, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND T

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00004-CV Rockwall Ranch Property Owners Association, Appellant v. Joseph Gonzales, Daniel Estrada, and Jerry Werlla, Appellees FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2020-1418C, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00004-CV Rockwall Ranch Property Owners Association, Appellant v. Joseph Gonzales, Daniel Estrada, and Jerry Werlla, Appellees FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. C2020-1418C, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER

Affirmed in part, Dismissed in part, and Substitute Opinion filed May 16, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00981-CV JERRY SANCHEZ, TIMOTHY WILIAMS, AND JOSE ESTRADA, Appellants V. JAMES DANIEL BOONE, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court

BENHAM, Justice. On November 7, 2013, appellee Tyler Estrada, who was 18 years old at the time, was in custody in DeKalb County when two Gwinnett County police investigators questioned him about a Gwinnett County homicide.1 Upon holding an evidentiary hearing at which the lead interrogating officer testified and at which audio recordings of appel-lee’s custodial statement were placed into evidenc

Affirmed in part, Dismissed in part, and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed March 19, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00981-CV JERRY SANCHEZ, TIMOTHY WILIAMS, AND JOSE ESTRADA, Appellants V. JAMES DANIEL BOONE, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Affirmed in part, Dismissed in part, and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed March 19, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00981-CV JERRY SANCHEZ, TIMOTHY WILIAMS, AND JOSE ESTRADA, Appellants V. JAMES DANIEL BOONE, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated December 20, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On May 4, 2000, Jorge Estrada left his two-year-old son, the plaintiff Daniel Estrada, watching television unattende

Miller, Judge. Following a joint jury trial, Juan Manuel Estrada-Nava, Fernando Padilla-Chavez, and Carlos Humberto Duron (collectively, the “Defendants”) were convicted of trafficking in cocaine (OCGA § 16-13-31 (a) (2009)). The Defendants appeal from the denial of their motions for new trial, contending that the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained from an illegal wiretap; the evidence was insufficient to support

MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. The Clerk shall file petitioners’ late response to respondent’s motion for summary affirmance in part and dismissal in part. This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider or

MEMORANDUM ** Arizona state prisoner George Melendez Estrada appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Arredondo v. Ortiz, 365 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm. Estrada contends that his aggravated sentence was imposed in violation of the Constituti

560 F.3d 1039 (2009) Jose Estuardo ESTRADA, aka Jose Fermin Estrada, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-75772. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 2009.[*] Filed March 26, 2009. *1040 Henry A. Posada, Law Offices of Henry A. Posada, Do

MEMORANDUM ** Arizona state prisoner George Melendez Estrada appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Arredondo v. Ortiz, 365 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm. Estrada contends that his aggravated sentence was imposed in violation of the Constituti

MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. The Clerk shall file petitioners’ late response to respondent’s motion for summary affirmance in part and dismissal in part. This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider or

OPINION EBEL, Circuit Judge: Defendant Luis Ocampo-Estrada (Ocampo) was convicted of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The district court then determined that Ocampo had previously been convicted of a state offense, which qualified as a “felony drug offense” under 21 U.S.C, § 841(

MEMORANDUM *** Jose Jesus Leyva-Estrada, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Makene Jacobs and Daniel Herredia appeal from judgments entered in the District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) sentencing both defendants to mandatory terms of life imprisonment for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute heroin in excess of 1000 grams, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. In a concurrently filed summary order

430 F.3d 606 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Frank ESTRADA, also known as "The Terminator," also known as "Big Dog," also known as Frankie Estrada, also known as "Mustard"; Edward Estrada, also known as "French Fry," also known as "Fry"; Isaias Soler, also known as "Eso"; Nelson Carrasquillo; William Rodriguez, also known as Billy Rodriguez, also known as William Gomez, also known as "Billy the Kid"; Charles DeJesus, also known as "Chi

63 Cal.App.4th 1090 (1998) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT GENE ESTRADA, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. D026077. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. May 11, 1998. *1092 COUNSEL Martin Nebrida Buchanan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Michael Hilliard appeals from a judgment entered on December 15, 2003, in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Stefan R. Underhill, Judge) convicting him, following his guilty plea, of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute in excess of 1000 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a), (b)(1)(a) and sentencing him principally to a term of imprisonmen