Cases

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. In this opinion, we bring our circuit law into conformity with the Supreme Court's precedent on the emergency aid exception to the Fourth Amendment requirement that a warrant be obtained before police entry into homes. We explain below. On March 3, 2015, Matthew Hill, age 28, overdosed and was taken to Morton Hospital in Taunton, Massachusetts

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted for review the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Walsh v. State, 751 So.2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Walker v. State, 479 So.2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismisse

BARFIELD, C. J. We find that the trial court properly denied the appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, which was grounded on his insanity defense. The evidence presented indicated that the appellant suffered from bipolar disorder, required medication to treat the disorder, became angry and erratic when he was not taking his prescribed medication, and may not have been taking his medication on the night the offenses wer

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge. Relator Greg Hudalla has brought qui tam claims on behalf of the United States against Walsh Construction Company under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a). Hudalla claims that Walsh utilized fraudulent billing practices while working as general contractor on eight federally funded affordable housing projects a

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. This matter arises out of a mortgage fraud scheme that took place between April 1996 and June 1997. In the roughly fifteen years since the scheme — which involved multiple lawsuits and indictments— no one has quite gotten to the bottom of it. What remains are claims asserted by Plaintiff Walsh Securities, Inc. (“WSI”) against Defendants Commonwealth Lan

PER CURIAM. Gary C. White, a black inmate, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 2000a, alleging that his court appointed counsel, the trial judge, the prosecutor, the court reporter and the deputy sheriff conspired together during White’s state criminal trial to discriminate against White because of his race and to

126 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 27 (1989) 558 A.2d 192 Thomas WALSH, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellee. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant, v. Thomas WALSH, Jr., Appellee. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 13, 1988. Decided May 12, 1989. *28 Edward F. Chacker, Daniel J.

The Appellate Division has “broad, plenary power to modify a sentence that is unduly harsh or severe under the circumstances, even though the sentence may be within the permissible statutory range” (People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 783 [1992]). “We may substitute our own discretion even where a trial court has not abused its discretion” (People v Edwards, 37 AD3d 289, 290 [1st Dept 2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 843 [2007]) and may reduc

621 F.2d 276 Gary WHITE, Appellant,v.Lackland BLOOM; Daniel Murphy; Robert J. Walsh, Appellees. Nos. 79-1858, 79-1893. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 24, 1980.Decided April 30, 1980. Gary White, appellant pro se. Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor and

526 Pa. 227 (1991) 585 A.2d 445 Thomas WALSH, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 3, 1990. Decided January 9, 1991. Reargument Denied February 11, 1991. *228 *229 Edward F. Chacker, Daniel J. Si

ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 6, 2015, a grand jury returned an Indictment (the “Indictment”) against the Defendant Edward M. Walsh, Jr. (the “Defendant”), an employee of the Suffolk County Sheriffs Office (“SCSO”). The Indictment alleges that from January 2011 to April 2014, the Defendant made false representations to the SCSO as to the amount of overtime and regular hours that he

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Daniel, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-4035.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical o

The Appellate Division has “broad, plenary power to modify a sentence that is unduly harsh or severe under the circumstances, even though the sentence may be within the permissible statutory range” (People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 783 [1992]). “We may substitute our own discretion even where a trial court has not abused its discretion” (People v Edwards, 37 AD3d 289, 290 [1st Dept 2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 843 [2007]) and may reduc

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR DANIEL BROTHERS, ) No. ED112609 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD LEE JONES, JR., No. 20-15642 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cv-02034- MTL-JZB S. SLADE, South Unit Property Officer COII #1777 at Arizona Department of Corrections; D. OPINION MILLER, Employee of Office of Publication Rev

2017 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1292-CR and 2015AP1293-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edward J. Zimbal, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF AP

ORDER EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge. BACKGROUND This is the next chapter in the protracted litigation involving the recovery of attorney’s fees on behalf of Daniel R. Walsh (hereinafter “Walsh”) for work he did representing William Cody Kelly (hereinafter “Kelly”) in the 1980s in Kelly’s quest to secure building permits for land near Lake Tahoe. On Febru

937 N.E.2d 1167 (2010) Daniel WALSH, Champaign County Sheriff, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CHAMPAIGN COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT COMMISSION; Chair Jon Rector, in his Official Capacity; Susan Schwartz, in her Official Capacity; and Edward McGhee, in his Official Capacity, Defendants, and Rhonda Tarr, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-10-0194. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge: A Runyonesque gambit at the Bowie Race Track on February 14, 1975, resulted in a very peculiar horse race and a thirteen count indictment by a federal grand jury. Subsequently, the appellants, Walsh,1 Gino, Feliciano and Davidson, all of whom were jockeys at Bowie, were convicted by a jury in the District Court of Maryland of conspiracy to commit sports bribery in vio

2018 WI 16 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2506-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel J. H. Bartelt, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS