Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Daniel Earl Moore”
Earl Daniel Moore v. Statepublic domain
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006. In The
People v. Moorepublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered July 16, 2010, as amended November 30, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years, unanimously affirmed. The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppr
Williams v. Moorepublic domain
LOCKEMY, J. In this property dispute, Elgie and Larry Moore appeal the trial court’s decision to grant relief to Barbara B. Danley Williams, Sylvia H. Durant Cotton, Janie Durant Ancrum, Tricia Durant Middleton, and Carolyn Durant White (collectively known as Respondents). Specifically, the Moores argue the trial court erred in: (1) basing its decision on the incorrect survey; (2) denying the Moores’ motion for directed verd
Daniel Demetris v. Transp. Workers Union of Am.public domain
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a labor union’s decision to distribute the proceeds of a bankruptcy settlement to all of its members unevenly violates its duty of fair representation. I A American Airlines, Inc., and American Eagle Airlines, Inc. (collec
State of Florida v. James Earl Gaffordpublic domain
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-0196 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-006891-O _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. JAMES EA
Daniel v. Ballitchpublic domain
[Cite as Daniel v. Ballitch, 2019-Ohio-5181.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: DONNA DANIEL : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Plaintiff-Appellee
People v. Moorepublic domain
576 N.E.2d 900 (1991) 215 Ill. App.3d 836 159 Ill.Dec. 977 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl MOORE, Defendants-Appellant. No. 1-87-0464. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. May 21, 1991. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 30, 1991.
United States v. Earl Hall, IIIpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-2268 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EARL LAFAYETTE HALL, III, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Distric
Moore v. Statepublic domain
The appellant was found guilty of the offenses of first degree robbery, first degree rape, first degree burglary and first degree theft, and was sentenced pursuant to the provisions of the Alabama Habitual Felony Offender Act to life imprisonment without parole (as to the first degree robbery, first degree rape, and first degree burglary convictions), and also sentenced to life imprisonment (as to the first degree theft charge). From said convictions and sentences, this appeal follows
People v. Moorepublic domain
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of the Statement of Facts and parts I through IV of the Discussion. OPINION A jury convicted appellants Rodney Moore and Wali Ameer Webb of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664/187). The jury also found Moore guilty of second degree
Moore v. Statepublic domain
754 P.2d 841 (1988) Randolph MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 17900. Supreme Court of Nevada. May 18, 1988. Earl T. Ayers, Las Vegas, for appellant. Brian McKay, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Rex Bell, Dist. Atty., James Tufteland, and Daniel M. Seaton, Deputy Dist. Attys., Clark County, Las Vegas, for respondent. OPINION</
McGowan v. Moorepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Robert G. McGowan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on a multi-plaintiff 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint filed by McGowan and over three hundred other inmates. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blackburn v. Moore, No. CA-99-102 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 28
State v. Moorepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2021-Ohio-287.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, J
Moore v. Walterspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT (October 29, 2014) Swan, Associate Justice. Appellant, Earl Moore, appeals the September 27, 2013, opinion and order of Appellate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, which affirmed a judgment entered by the Magistrate Division of the same court against him in the amount of $5,400. Moore asserts, that the hearing held by the Magistrate Division w
State v. Moorepublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v ) Cr. ID. No. 1405006237 ) ) ) Earle D. Moore, ) ) Defendant. ) Date Submitted: March 12, 2018 Date decided: June 27, 2018 COMMISSIONER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF Renee L. Hrivnak, Esquire, Delaware Department of Justice, 820 N. French St. 7th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801. Attorney for the State. John S. Edinger, Jr., Esquire, Offlce of Def
Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.public domain
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 5, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SU
Holmes v. Moorepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-122 No. 342PA19-2 Filed 16 December 2022 JABARI HOLMES, FRED CULP, DANIEL E. SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, and PAUL KEARNEY, SR. v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Caroli
Holmes v. Moorepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-122 No. 342PA19-2 Filed 16 December 2022 JABARI HOLMES, FRED CULP, DANIEL E. SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, and PAUL KEARNEY, SR. v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Caroli
Holmes v. Moorepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 342PA19-3 Filed 28 April 2023 JABARI HOLMES, FRED CULP, DANIEL E. SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, AND PAUL KEARNEY, SR. v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; DAVID R. LEWIS, in his
Daniel Wayne McLemore v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00314-CR; 12-14-00315-CR; 12-14-316-CR; 12-14-00317-CR; 12-14-00318-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS