Cases

OPINION QUIST, District Judge. The Court has before it the following: (1) Motion of all Defendants, except the United States (the “Butcher Defendants”), for reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order dated December 14, 1998; (2) the Butcher Defendants’ supplemental motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 14, 1998, Opinion and Order; (3) the United States’ Motion to Alter or Ame

35 F.Supp.2d 554 (1998) Jobst W.F. BLACHY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert BUTCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 1:91-CV-979. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 14, 1998. *555 David A. Lerner, Plunkett & Cooney, PC, Bloomfield Hills, MI, Jeffrey G. Raphelson, Bodman, Longley & Dahling, LLP,

679 N.E.2d 1260 (1997) 288 Ill. App.3d 120 223 Ill.Dec. 487 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. BUTCHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-96-0230. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. May 8, 1997. Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Defender, Duane E. Schuster (argued), Assistant Defender,

88 F.Supp.2d 788 (2000) Richard A. BUTCHER, Thomas H. Johnson, James Thomas and Daniel J. Velkovich, individually and as Class Representatives, Plaintiffs, v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1:98-CV-585. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 30, 2000. *789 H. Rhett Pinsky, Pinsky, Smith, Fa

632 F.3d 568 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio LEYVA-MARTINEZ, a.k.a. Jose Antonio Levya-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50269. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted to a Motions Panel December 6, 2010. Filed January 27, 2011. *569 Daniel E. Butcher, Es

[Cite as State v. Butcher, 2022-Ohio-928.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID M. BUTCHER, Defendant-Appella

657 F.3d 1000 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher IBARRA-PINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 2011. Filed September 20, 2011. *1001 Janet C. Tung, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, f

FILED 15-0729 11/10/2015 2:13:55 PM tex-7766971 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHO

19-224 Butcher v. Wendt 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2019 5 6 (Argued: March 10, 2020 Decided: September 22, 2020) 7 8 Docket No. 19-224-cv 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 GEORGE H. BUTCHER III, 13 14

62 B.R. 162 (1986) In re Sonya W. BUTCHER, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 3-83-01422. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. May 2, 1986. *163 McMackin, Garfinkle & McLemore, Edwin M. Walker, Nashville, Tenn., for trustee. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Ezra H. Cohen, Mary Grace Diehl, Atlanta, Ga., and Daniel, C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ED BUTCHER; LONNY BERGSTROM, No. 21-35010 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 6:20-cv-00057- DLC AUSTIN KNUDSEN, * in his official capacity as Attorney General of Montana; JEFFREY MANGAN, in his

673 F.3d 1136 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel DEL TORO-BARBOZA, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adin Del Toro-Barboza, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-50487, 10-50491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2011. Filed March 14, 2012.

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Steve Butcher, Rick Beams, and Glen Boatright, individually and as representative members of Local 2284, International Association of Fire Fighters, brought suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma against the City of McAl-ester, State of Oklahoma, Randy Green, the City Manager for McAlester, Larry Ket-chum, the Fire Chief for McA

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING This appeal is brought from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding the defendant not liable for injuries suffered by an eleven-year-old who was injured when an elevator door collapsed. We disagree with the plaintiff that he was entitled to have the jury instructed on res ipsa loquitor where the physical evidence, consisting of the elevator’s nylon bottom guides and the door, had been

MEMORANDUM ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge. This is an action for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and common law. Plaintiffs allege that defendants committed the violations in connection with the offering for sale stock in the former United American Bank in Knoxville. Plaintiffs ask the Court to certify a c

Davis, Justice: This appeal was brought by the Honorable Judge William Douglas Witten (“Judge Wit-ten”) from a decision of a three-member Special Court that denied him relief in his contest of the May 10, 2016, nonpartisan election for the Office of Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Logan County, Division 1. In this appeal, Judge Witten argues that the Special Court should

550 F.Supp. 692 (1981) Patrick A. BUTCHER and Lisa A. Butcher v. ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS COMPANY; Rheem Manufacturing Company, T/A Ruud Manufacturing Company; and Arundel Gas & Water Conditioning Company. Civ. No. HM81-72. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 31, 1981. *693 *694 J.

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s opinion with respect to the inadmissibility of the polyg-rapher’s testimony proffered by the defense. There is only one disputed issue in this case, viz: Whether Teresa Maria Campos knew that the marijuana was hidden in the ceiling compartment above the passenger side of the van th

72 B.R. 447 (1987) In re Jacob F. BUTCHER, a/k/a Jake F. Butcher, Jake Butcher, and JFB Petroleum & Land Company, Inc., Debtor. John H. BAILEY, III, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. METZGER, SHADYAC & SCHWARZ, a partnership, and Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Defendants. METZGER, SHADYAC & SCHWARZ, Cross-Claimant, v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS & WELLS, P.A., Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LACY & WINCHES

GILMAN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which WELLFORD, J., joined. SILER, J. (pp. 912-13), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Even a diabolical bar examiner would be reluctant to impose this case’s complex mixture of subject matter jurisdiction, fraud, real estate, marital property, bankruptcy,