Cases

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In 1990, Charles P. Nelson and Darlene F. Nelson ("the Nelsons") purchased a Gold Star Homeowners Insurance Policy ("Gold Star Policy" or "Policy") from American Family Mutual Insurance Company ("American Family") on their home in Monticello, Minnesota. The Policy provided that the Nelsons could recover up to 120% of the policy limit in the event of a total loss

ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Individual Claims (“Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J.”) [Doc. No. 221], Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify the Class (“Pls.’ Class Cert. Mot.”) [Doc. No. 208], and various Daubert challenges to expert witnesses made by both parties (collectively, the “Daubert </

770 A.2d 364 (2001) TOWNSHIP OF INDIANA, Appellant, v. ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS, INC.; ComServ, Inc.; and Fayette Bank. Township of Indiana, Appellant, v. Acquisitions & Mergers, Inc.; ComServ, Inc.; and Fayette Bank. Township of Indiana v. Acquisitions & Mergers, Inc.; ComServ, Inc.; and Fayette Bank Comserv, Inc., Appellant. Hartwood Estates Garden Club, Chester R. Babst, III, Mary Louise Babst, Nadav Baum,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL BUCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N20C-08-249 MAA CCLD v. ) ) VIKING HOLDING ) MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) Submi

406 F.Supp.2d 893 (2005) Vincent E. "Bo" JACKSON and Ellen Coleman, Plaintiffs, v. The CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP, Medianews Group, Inc., Medianews Group Interactive, Inc., Jim Mohr, Steve Lambert, and Robert Balzer, Defendants. No. 05 C 3459. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 26, 2005. *894</

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge In an earlier Order, the court decided to defer the decision whether to grant plaintiffs’ request for permanent injunctive relief. See Doc. 126 at 32. The court now has considered the parties’ additional submissions and is prepared to rule on that issue. For reasons expl

LAY, Circuit Judge. This case has a long, tortured, and unfortunate history. In August 1988, Lois Jenson and Patricia Kosmach filed a class action suit against Eveleth Mines 1 alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and the Minnesota Human R

650 S.W.2d 185 (1983) Thomas A. GIBSON, Jr. and Arthur L. Gibson, Appellants, v. William G. BURKHART and Edward Y. Browning, Appellees. No. 2410. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 31, 1983. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1983. *186 Peter L. Bargmann, Walden & Bargmann, Dallas, Larry E. Wadler, Wharton

OPINION FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Arthur Hobbs appeals his conviction based on a conditional guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Hobbs contends that the district court abused its discretion by precluding two defense witnesses from testifying at a suppression hearing after the wit

578 S.W.2d 401 (1979) Daniel Craig COOPER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 55445. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2. March 21, 1979. *402 G. Bert Smith, Jr. (on appeal only), Andrews, for appellant. John H. Green, Dist. Atty. and Dennis Cadra, Asst. Dist. Atty., Odessa, Robert Huttash, State's

597 P.2d 18 (1979) 100 Idaho 295 Myron Edward HARBAUGH and Bert D. Harbaugh, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MYRON HARBAUGH MOTOR, INC., dba Harbaugh Motor Company, a corporation, Manuelita Harbaugh, Individually, and Manuelita Harbaugh, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Myron Harbaugh, Deceased, Defendants-Respondents. No. 12892. Supreme Court of Idaho.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL BUCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N20C-08-249 MAA CCLD v. ) ) VIKING HOLDING ) MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, ) ) Defendant.

Per Curiam. The dispositive issue in this case is whether a challenge to the constitutionality of our minority representation statute, General Statutes § 9-167a, comes within the jurisdictional confines of General Statutes, § 9-328,1 which, under narrowly *497defined circumstances, provides expedited judicial procedures for the resolution of el

743 F.Supp. 393 (1990) William V. BIDWELL, et al. v. Edward R. GARVEY, et al. Thomas J. CONDON, et al. v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al. Civ. Nos. JH-87-509, JH-87-698. United States District Court, D. Maryland. May 7, 1990. *394 Lee T. Ellis, Jr., Sargent Karch, Leonard Freiman and Baker & Hostetler, College Pa

639 F.Supp.2d 1074 (2009) Glenn TIBBLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDISON INTERNATIONAL, et al., Defendants. No. CV 07-5359 SVW (AGRx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 16, 2009. *1080 G. Cresswell Templeton, III, William A. White, Hill Farrer and Burrill LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Jason P. Kelly, Jerome J. Schlichter,

DECISION ON MOTION TO ENFORCE SALE ORDER ROBERT E. GERBER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: Introduction... 520 Summary of Conclusions... 523 1. Due Process... 523 (a) Notice Before Entry of Sale Order ...524 (b) Notice Before Expungement of Claims... 525 (c) Requirement for Prejudice... 525

OWEN, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, and GONZALEZ, HECHT, CORNYN, ENOCH and ABBOTT, Justices, join. The issue in this case is whether there is any evidence that the drug Bendectin caused Kelly Havner to be born with a birth defect. We hold that the evidence offered is legally insufficient to establish causation. Accordingly, we reverse

Eldon E. Fallon, U.S. District Court Judge *623Before the Court are two motions to dismiss without prejudice filed by Plaintiffs *624Herman LeBlanc, R. Doc. 569, and Donnie Beasley, R. Doc. 572. The motions are opposed. R. Doc. 579. Plaintiffs have filed a reply. R. Doc. 590. Havin

5 A.3d 1174 (2010) 195 Md. App. 124 MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY POLICE LODGE # 34 OF the FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, INC., et al. v. MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al. No. 1885, Sept. Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 30, 2010. *1178 Michael Marshall (Schlachman, Belsk

HOLLANDER, J. This appeal involves a dispute between the Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge # 34 of the Fraternal Order *132of Police, Inc. (“FOP” or the “Lodge”), appellant/cross-appel-lee, and the Maryland Transportation Authority (“MdTA” or the “Authority”), appellee/cross-appellant. At issue is a “Memorandum” signed in February 2006 by Trent M. Kittle-