Cases

Scott, J.: This action for damages for personal injuries resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff against the defendant Thom, and in favor of the defendant Scudder against plaintiff. These appeals, for there are three of them, are taken from an order made after verdict upon motions by plaintiff and defendant Thom to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The plaintiff appeals from the order hi so far

On April 5th, 1928, the complainant filed his bill against Mayberry's Dyers and Cleaners, Incorporated (hereinafter called "Mayberry's"), and Phoebe Snow Dyers and Cleaners, Incorporated, alleging that the defendants maintained a dyeing and cleaning business on the premises immediately adjoining complainant's property, and that the defendants in operating that plant caused noises, vibration, smoke, fumes, vapors and gases to be emitted therefrom to the extent that the complainant was made sic

Per Curiam. For the reasons assigned in Hand v. Rogers and Lynch v. Sauer (opinions this day filed), the motion will, be denied, with $10 costs. Present: Daly, P, J., McAdam and Bischoff, JJ. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Bischoff, J. This, action was brought to recover the agreed price of goods manufactured under a contract between the parties, the defendants having refused acceptance, claiming nonperformance upon the plaintiff’s part. The contract was entered into in June, 1893, and called for the furnishing of 1,000 blank-hooks, to he made according to sample,' and delivered “ as soon as possible, which will be about August 1

866 F.Supp. 657 (1994) Frederic SARGEANT, Plaintiff, v. Thom SERRANI, Defendant. Civ. No. B-89-593 (TFGD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 14, 1994. *658 *659 Joseph D. Garrison, Robert A. Richardson, New Haven, CT, for plaintiff. James V. Minor, Richard A. Robin

OPINION AND ORDER FINDING RESPONDENT REMAINS IN CONTEMPT AND RENEWING REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ARREST WARRANT JOHN S. DALIS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before me on remand from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (“District Court”) following Debtor Kipp Leshone Tate’s appeal of my Order of Civil Contempt and Application for the Issuance of an Arrest War

NO. 5-06-0585 NOTICE Decision filed 04/17/08. The text of IN THE this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS Peti tion for Rehearing or th e disposition of the same. FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________

NO. 5-06-0585 NOTICE Decision filed 07/16/10. The text of IN THE this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS Peti tion for Rehearing or th e disposition of the same. FIFTH DISTRICT ____________________________________________________

POSNER, Circuit Judge. We have consolidated for decision appeals in two class actions filed under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). The Act provides, so far as relates to these cases, that “no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print [electronically, as distinct from by handwriting or b

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR., District Judge. On February 7, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 12), seeking an interim remedy for alleged constitutional infirmities in North Carolina Session Law 2011-407 (“SL 2011-407”). Plaintiffs filed a brief in support of this motion (Doc. 13), Defendants filed a brief in opposition (Doc.' 20), and Plaintiffs fil

GILMAN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BATCHELDER, J., joined. ROGERS, J. (p. 806), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. In 2001, Jaqueline Chesher and other named plaintiffs initiated a class action lawsuit against Hamilton County, several individuals employed at the Hamilton

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BOZO KELAVA,  Petitioner, No. 03-73689 v.  Agency No. A18-715-040 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge MOTZ wrote a dissenting opinion. WYNN, Circuit Judge: “The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the Sta

Berdon, J., dissenting. The majority remands this case to the trial court on the basis of a hypertechnical application of our subject matter jurisdiction. The issue that both parties urge us to decide today is a pure question of law—that is, whether the defendant board of ethics of the city of Stamford retains jurisdiction to investigate alleged official misconduct after the official in question has left municip

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BOZO KELAVA,  No. 03-73689 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A18-715-040 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED Respondent.

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. Bozo Kelava, a Croatian national, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA concluded Kelava was ineligible for a discretionary waiver of inadmissibility or cancellation of removal for having engaged in terrorist activity. In an issue of first impression, Kelava argues it is impermissibly retroactive to d

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. James A. Chute was seriously injured when an unknown object, possibly a piece of wood, struck him below his left eye. The object was thrown by a “Sears Craftsman” radial arm saw operated by his employees. Chute sued the saw’s seller, Sears, Roebuck & Co., on theories of negligence and breach of warranty in Massachusetts Superior Court. Sears removed th

TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND.78 STANDARDS IN DECIDING THE MOTIONS .79 DISCUSSION.80 I.Statute of Limitations.•.80 A. Section 10(b) Claims .80 1. The Applicable Statute of Limitations.80 2. The Date of Commencement of the Related Actions.82- 3. The One-Year/Three-Year Rule.83 a) The

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge: ORDER The Opinion filed on June 7, 2005, and appearing at 410 F.3d 625 (9th Cir.2005), is hereby amended, and the amended Opinion will be filed concurrently with this Order. With the Opinion as amended, the panel has voted to deny Petitio

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 97-1988 JAMES A. CHUTE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendants, Appellees. APPEA