Cases

JUSTICE McCLANAHAN, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the Court's judgment that the circuit court properly dismissed the claims asserted in the amended complaint against Gospel Tabernacle Church of God in Christ and Church of God in Christ, Inc. (the "church defendants") for negligent hiring, retention, and supervision; negligent infliction of emotional distress; and punitive

The opinion of the court was delivered by Blanchard, J. Defendant, under contract with a Railroad Company, worked a gravel pit. He was getting out gravel for the Company. The means employed to get it out was a steam shovel, which was operated by an engine. This engine was placed upon a kind of car, which was run on wheels *171on a

1 Reported in 208 N.W. 22. Appeal in a will contest by the contestant from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The instrument in question was allowed in the probate court as the last will and testament of George Christ, deceased, that court finding it to have been executed by him as required by law, that he was then mentally competent to make a will, and that no undue i

In an action to reform an automobile liability insurance policy and to recover damages for fraud, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 30,1971, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Order modified, on the law, by striking therefrom the words “and the complaint is dismissed”, which follow the provision that the “motion is granted”, and by inserting immediately after

Motion by appellant to stay all proceedings, pending appeal, denied. Nolan, P. j., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

590 F.2d 1062 191 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 4 Media L. Rep. 1410 OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION OF the UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,Radio Television News Directors Assn., Public BroadcastingService, CBS, Inc., ABC, Inc., NBC, Inc., theNational Association of Broadcasters,and Delaware Broadcasting Co.,Intervenors.

Opinion for the Court filed by BAZELON, Circuit Judge. BAZELON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner, the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ (UCC), an intervenor in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), seeks review of the Commission’s latest expansion of the “on-the-spot” exemption to the equal opportunities provision of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 315(a

131 F.Supp.2d 174 (2001) AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-2762 (SSH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 22, 2001. *175 Thomas R. Daly, Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, Fairfax, VA, for plaintiff.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-0737 Tax Court Anderson, J. Alliance Housing Incorporated, et al., Respondents, vs. Filed: March 27, 2024 Office of Appellate

[Cite as State v. Demarcia, 2023-Ohio-4617.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-230380 TRIAL NO. B-2301110 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : O P I N I O N. VS.

Appeal from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme *1439Court, Wayne County (John J. Ark, J.), entered May 8, 2012. The judgment and order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the c

Appeal from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme *1439Court, Wayne County (John J. Ark, J.), entered May 8, 2012. The judgment and order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the c

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This case involves a public school district’s denial of an application to use a school auditorium for a fund-raiser with a religious theme. The school district has, through past practice, created either a limited public forum or designated public forum. That past practice included an openly religious fund-raiser. The district has failed to offer a sufficient justification for the denial in the instant

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 856 CA 13-00357 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. EUGENE F. MASON AND PATRICIA ANN MASON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VILLAGE OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. GREENE & REID, PLLC, SYRACUSE (EUGENE W. LANE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. PETRONE & PETRONE, P.C., UTICA, CONGDON,

256 P.3d 146 (2011) 242 Or. App. 425 The ASSOCIATION OF UNIT OWNERS OF TIMBERCREST CONDOMINIUMS, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gale Allen WARREN, dba Big Al's Construction, Defendant-Respondent, and Lighthouse Two, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; John Does 1-3; and Harry G. Cretin, P.E., an Oregon corporation, Defendants. C090892CV; A146137.

24-682-cv Xeriant, Inc. v. Auctus Fund LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2024 (Argued: October 22, 2024 Decided: June 25, 2025) Docket No. 24-682-cv XERIANT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN S. DALIS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came on for trial on the Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of Debt filed by Pioneer Construction, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) against Jeffery A. May (“Debtor”). (ECF No. 16; A.P. ECF No. 1.)1 The Complaint contends that a February 7, 2012, Consent Judgment (“Consent Judgment”) entered against the Debtor by the Superior C

*1224ON REMAND ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. hThe defendant, Jabari Williams, was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. In State v. Williams, 13-0283 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/23/14), 137 So.3d 832 (“Williams I”), we affirmed Mr. Williams’ conviction and sentence. In State v. Williams, 14-1231 (La.1/16/15), 15

SMITH, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. While I fully concur with Division 1 of the majority, I respectfully dissent to the holding in Division 2 that a material issue of fact exists as to whether Heflin signed Ahern’s name with Ahern’s apparent authority, for two reasons. First, the apparent authority doctrine should not be used to reverse in this cas

[Cite as Fox v. Fergus Capital, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2255.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY ROBERT FOX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERGUS CAPITAL, LLC, Defendant-App