Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1884 ___________________________ Dakota Energy Cooperative, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

488 N.W.2d 892 (1992) Mark WESTOVER and Roxann Westover, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. EAST RIVER ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. 17607. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued April 21, 1992. Decided July 1, 1992. *894 James E. McMahon and Terry N. Prendergast of Boyce, Murphy, McDowe

578 N.W.2d 589 (1998) 1998 SD 60 Bradley W. PETERSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SPINK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Defendant and Appellee. No. 20156. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued April 27, 1998. Decided June 10, 1998. Kent Shelton and Gerald L. Kaufman, Jr. of Churchill, Manolis, Freeman, Kludt, Kaufman & Shelto

MR. JUSTICE HASWELL delivered the Opinion of the Court. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the District Court of Pondera County denying it a permanent injunction prohibiting defendant from supplying electrical power to a contractor. Plaintiff is an electric utility company holding a nonexclusive franchise to supply electrical power and service anywhere in the state of Montana. Defendant is

582 F.3d 309 (2009) State of CONNECTICUT, State of New York, People of the State of California ex rel. Attorney General Bill Lockyer, State of Iowa, State of New Jersey, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin, and City of New York, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation

382 N.W.2d 396 (1986) Roger LOVELL; Earl Lovell and Blanche Lovell, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. OAHE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Defendant and Appellant. No. 14497. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued November 27, 1984. Decided February 12, 1986. Rehearing Denied March 20, 1986. *397

92 Ariz. 373 (1962) 377 P.2d 309 Application of TRICO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a corporation, and Corona De Tucson, Inc., a corporation, for an Order Approving a Proposed Contract Between Corona De Tucson, Inc., and Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc., for the Distribution of Electrical Energy in Portions of Township 17 South, Range 15 East and Township 17 South, Range 16 East, in Pima County, State of Arizona. CORONA DE TUCSO

18 F.Supp.2d 70 (1998) SEBAGO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BEAZER EAST, INC., f/k/a Koppers Company, Inc., Manville Corporation and Schuller International, Inc., Defendants. Robert T. KARAM, Michael Biszko and Alan Biszko d/b/a Flint Village Plaza, Plaintiffs, v. BEAZER EAST, INC., f/k/a Koppers Company, Inc., Manville Corporation and Schuller International, Inc., Defendants. C.A. Nos. 96-10069-MLW, 96-10656-MLW

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. This appeal tests the boundaries of federal-question subject matter jurisdiction. The issue is whether a claim for breach of a long-term requirements contract for wholesale electricity arises under federal law or state law. We conclude that the claim arises under state law, that the district court therefore lacked jurisdiction to enter its preliminary in

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge. This case is before this court upon petition of Kingsbury Electric Cooperative, Inc., (Kingsbury), to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued September 17, 1962, reported at 138 NLRB - (No. 63). The Board in its answer requests enforcement of its order. The alleged unfair labor practices occurred within this circu

244 N.W.2d 519 (1976) SQUARE BUTTE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. E. Gene HILKEN, Defendant and Appellee, and eight companion cases.[*] Civ. No. 9194. Supreme Court of North Dakota. June 23, 1976. Rehearing Denied July 21, 1976. *520 Vogel, Vogel, Brantner & Kelly, Fargo, and Joh

472 F.3d 545 MAYO FOUNDATION, Petitioner,v.SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD; United States of America, Respondents,Edison Electric Institute; Western Coal Traffic League; National Rural Electric Cooperative Association; City of Highmore, SD; City of Huron, SD; City of Wolsey, SD; City of Philip, SD; City of Desmet, SD; City of Miller, SD; City of Wall, SD; City of Midland, SD; City of Pierre; City of Ree Heights, SD; Greater Huron Developme

719 F.Supp. 1489 (1989) WEST RIVER ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. BLACK HILLS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and Ellsworth Air Force Base, Defendants. (Three Cases) BLACK HILLS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HEARTLAND CONSUMERS POWER DISTRICT, Defendant. (Three Cases) Nos. CIV. 88-5151 to CIV. 88-5153 and CIV. 89-5019. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, W.D.<

492 N.W.2d 916 (1992) ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC., Highway-Heavy-Utilities Chapter, a South Dakota Corporation with its principal place of business in Pierre, South Dakota; South Dakota Trucking Association, a South Dakota Corporation with its principal place of business in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Gregory B. Branaugh, Individually; D & G Concrete Construction, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation; Pat Tlustos, Individually; an

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiff Eden Isle Marina, Inc. operates a commercial marina located on a lake owned by the United States Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). It contends that the Corps breached the commercial concession leases governing its operation of the marina by thwarting its repeated attempts to develop its leasehold as per

PERRY, District Judge. Dakota Gasification Company (“Dakota”) appeals from the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment in favor of Pas-coe Building Systems (“Pascoe”). The district court ruled that the economic loss doctrine prevented Dakota from availing itself of

382 B.R. 459 (2007) In re HOROB LIVESTOCK INC., Debtor, and In re Todd K. Horob, Debtor. Joseph V. Womack, Plaintiff, v. Horob Livestock Inc., James L. Horob, Bea M. Horob, Larry G. Horob, Todd. Kenneth Horob, Teresa Horob, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Daryle Syme, Mary Ziegler, and James Ziegler, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 06-60149-7, 06-60150-7. Adversary Nos. 07-00001, 06-00150.

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Control of more than half the nation’s electrical grid is divided among seven Regional Transmission Organizations, as shown in Figure 1. These are voluntary associations of utilities that own electrical transmission lines interconnected to form a regional grid and that agree to delegate operational control of the grid to the association. See 18 C.F.R. § 35

ACCEPTED 13-15-00312-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/19/2015 6:10:46 PM