Cases

132 B.R. 752 (1991) In Re DAISY SYSTEMS SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. C-86-20127(A) SW. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 9, 1991. *753 Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach, William S. Lerach, Leonard B. Simon, Blake M. Harper, San Diego, Cal., Barrack Rodos & Bacine, Leonard Barrack, Gerald J. Rodos, Edward

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas CONCURRING OPINION No. 04-23-00099-CV Daisy Campos RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. Ricardo “Richie” RANGEL, Jr.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-23-00099-CV Daisy Campos RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. Ricardo “Richie” RANGEL Jr.,

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This case was considered on the record from the Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission and upon the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons explained in the acco

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00267-CV Daisy Wanda Garcia, Appellant v. Thomas Lee Baumgarten, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-12-002429, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2021.07.12 Commission '00'06- 09:59:52 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-022 Filing Date: June 7, 2021 No.

Reversed and Dismissed and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed January 11, 2024 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00061-CV CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. SAMUEL SALAZAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SAMMY SALAZAR; JUSTIN PACHECO, ROZA SALAZAR, AND DAISY SALAZAR, Appellees On Appea

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00107-CV ___________________________ KRAIG PEPPER, D.O., Appellant V. JUAQUAETTA WILSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 236th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 236-311119-19 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Former prosecutors Andrew Thomas and Lisa Aubuchon, and their spouses, (“Defendants”) appeal the district court’s partial denial of their motions to dismiss. Former Maricopa County Board of Supervisors member Donald T. Stapley, Jr. and his spouse (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendants initiated a frivolous federal civil

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-235 CV

626 F.3d 1222 (2010) NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABBYY SOFTWARE HOUSE, Abbyy USA Software House, Lexmark International, Inc., Abbyy Production LLC, and Abbyy Software Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2010-1100. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. November 12, 2010. *1227 M. Craig Tyler, Wilson

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

Justice JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice HECHT, Justice GREEN, Justice WILLETT, and Justice BROWN joined. This interlocutory appeal concerns an asbestos-related injury suit in which Union Carbide Corporation filed a motion to dismiss based on the plaintiffs’ alleged failure to timely serve a statutorily compliant physician report. The Multi-District Lit

724 F.Supp. 44 (1989) Jeffrey BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant. No. 88-CV-997. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 8, 1989. *45 Setright & Ciabotti, Syracuse, New York (Victor J. Ciabotti, of counsel), for plaintiff. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick, Schwarzer & Sugnet, P.C., Syra

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from this Court’s en banc judgment affirming the trial court’s order denying Union Carbide Corporation’s (“Union Carbide”) motion to dismiss 1 the claims of Daisy E. Synatzske and Grace Annette Webb, individually and as representatives and co-executrixes of the estate of Joseph Emmite, Sr., Joseph Emmite, Jr., Dorothy Day

97 F.3d 1171 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7123, 96 Daily JournalD.A.R. 11,695In re DAISY SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Daisy/Cadnetix, Inc.BEAR STEARNS AND COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation;Bruce M. Holland; Burton J. McMurtry; Carl D.Carman; F. Gibson Meyers; Lutz P.Henckels, Creditors-Appellees,v.DAISY SYSTEMS CORP., Debtor,andJack S. Kenney, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee forDaisy Systems Corporati

NUMBER 13-04-297-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBU

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

74 S.E.2d 704 (1953) 237 N.C. 266 WILSON et ux. v. WILSON et al. No. 97. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 25, 1953. *705 Clyde M. Roberts, Marshall, for petitioners appellees. Calvin R. Edney, Marshall, for defendants appellants. DEVIN, C. J., The appellants attack the validit

827 P.2d 170 (1992) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Clyde R. HEIMBACH, Deceased, Daisy HEIMBACH, Appellant, v. Shirley M. GUINEY and Saundra M. Thornburg, Appellees. No. 78750. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 10, 1992. ORDER Appellees' motion to dismiss is denied with prejudice to its reargument. 12 O.S. 1991 Supp. § 653 provides that a motio