Cases

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00506-CV TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant v. CLARENCE CLARENCE DAILEY ELECTRIC, INC.,

638 S.E.2d 433 (2006) ELLIS v. FULLER. No. A06A1380. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 7, 2006. *434 David C. Gottlieb, Lafayette, for appellant. John R. Emmett, Trenton, for appellee. RUFFIN, Chief Judge. Thomas Ellis ("Ellis") sued Glen Fuller ("Fuller"), alleging that Fuller refused to release equipmen

193 Ill. App.3d 83 (1989) 548 N.E.2d 1361 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MOLINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFF, HARPER, FOX AND DAILEY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 3-89-0206. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed December 29, 1989. *84 Law Office of Mike McElvain, of Bloomington (Mike McElvain, of

824 So.2d 599 (2002) Robert Albert FULLER v. Albert John CHIMENTO, Sr. No. 2001-IA-00057-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 25, 2002. *600 Byron Stockstill, Picayune, attorney for appellant. James L. Farrior, III, Biloxi, attorney for appellee. EN BANC. WALLER, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. This interlo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-IA-00057-SCT ROBERT ALBERT FULLER v. ALBERT JOHN CHIMENTO, SR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 5/2/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES H. C. THOMAS, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: PEARL RIVER COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: BYRON STOCKSTILL ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:

574 P.2d 508 (1977) Vic E. BREEDEN, Executor of the Estate of Charline H. Breeden, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. L. DAILEY and Jean Dailey, Defendants-Appellees. No. 76-467. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. September 15, 1977. Rehearing Denied October 6, 1977. Certiorari Denied February 6, 1978. *509</

This is the second appeal of this case; the first is reported in Swan v. Dailey-Luce Auto Company, 221 Iowa 842, 265 N.W. 143. As the facts in this case are substantially identical with those involved in the case on the former appeal, we will not enter into an extended review thereof here, but for a further review thereof will refer to the facts set out therein. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, defendants filed

On Rehearing En Banc Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and DANAHER; BURGER, WRIGHT, Mc-GOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge: Appellant Fuller.was prosecuted on a three count indictment. Count I charged first degree felony-murder, Count II charged first degree premeditated murder

Appellant only seeks relief in two respects. He asks the appointment of a trustee empowered to sell after the debt is clearly barred by limitation, when this is set up as a defense. To grant this would be but an indirect way to accomplish through a court what could not be done directly through its own process. Before appointing a trustee with power to sell, such as the trustee named in the trust deed had, the court would necessarily have to inquire whether plaintiff shows a claim which the la

Mr. Justice Dibell delivered the opinion of the court. In the extreme southerly part of the city of Peoria Krause avenue and the railway tracks -of appellant cross each other diagonally. On September 27, 1909, Marcel Koebel was driving a light wagon on Krause avenue and had in front a high seat on which he was sitting and with him Mrs. Nellie Fuller and Mrs. P

HANEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an adverse decree in a suit for infringement of a patent issued to plaintiff, No. 1,945,422. The relief asked by plaintiff was that his patent be declared valid and infringed by defendant; that defendant be enjoined from using, manufacturing, or selling devices made in accordance to the invention patented; for an accounting, and other relief unnecessary to relate.

This is a personal injury case. All the questions involved arise on the instructions granted and on the prayers rejected by the trial Court, and they are brought up by the one bill of exceptions which the record contains. The legal principles that must control the final decision are perfectly familiar and the only difficulty presented springs, as is generally the case, from the application of those principles to the peculiar facts of the occurrence. A brief statement of the facts — both

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 619 The plaintiff, Victoria Hudson, alleges that she is the owner of seven hundred and sixty acres of land in the Rancho de la Puente, that said land is riparian to a stream of water known as San Jose Creek and is entitled to riparian rights therein, and to receive of its waters for use thereon a flow of two hundred a

Waliceb, J. This is an action upon a note for $1,500, given as the-price of an automobile, possession of wbicb it is alleged was obtained by false and fraudulent representations of Charles II. Reaves, one of the-defendants. It is alleged that after getting possession of the car at. Graham, in this State, the defendants left the State, taking the automobile with them, and changed their residence to Roanoke, Ya., where-they now ar

ARONSON, J. *139Fred Kamgar appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay Moira Kamgar $1,952,056.50 for breach of his spousal fiduciary duties in failing to disclose to her that he risked in options trading an additional $8 million more than the $2.5 million in community assets she agreed he could trade in their investment account. The trial cou

539 S.E.2d 692 (2000) STATE of North Carolina v. Carlton Dale WALL, a/k/a Carlton Moonie Wall. No. COA99-1208. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 29, 2000. *693 Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Assistant Attorney General Ted R. Williams, for the State. Richard M. Dailey, Jr., Greensboro, for defendant-appel

2005 SD 69 KATHLEEN M. THOMPSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TERRY L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LARRY MEHLHAFF d/b/a MEHLHAFF CONSTRUCTION AND d/b/a MEHLHAFF TRUCKING, Defendant and Appellant. Nos. 23229, 23230 Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued January 12, 2005 Opinion Filed June 8, 2005 JACK THEELER and DOUGLAS M. DAI

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge In the near-decade since the collapse of the United States real-estate market, this District has been inundated with lawsuits brought by putative victims of that collapse against those they blame for it. As time has lapsed, and with it various statutes of limitation,. the targets of these lawsuits—as- well as the proffered bases of liabi

63 Cal.Rptr.3d 483 (2007) 163 P.3d 160 41 Cal.4th 1337 Jeffrey ELKINS, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Contra Costa County, Respondent; Marilyn Elkins, Real Party in Interest. No. S139073. Supreme Court of California. August 6, 2007. *484 Garrett C. Dailey for Petitioner.</