Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “DWIGHT D. STANTON and DONNA STANTON”
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 8, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERTO VASQUES, LUIS D. VIDALES ROMERO, KEVIN JOEL HERNANDEZ, LUIS MARTIN VASQUEZ, HECTOR ALONZO, AND VICTOR HUGO GARZA Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2000-D-1876 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2004-00166-CCA-
State v. Vasquespublic domain
221 S.W.3d 514 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Roberto VASQUES, Kevin Joel Hernandez, Luis Martin Vasquez, Hector Alonzo, and Victor Hugo Garza[1]. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 5, 2006 Session. March 9, 2007. *516 Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Richard H. Dunavant, Assistant Attorney
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC; Living Essentials, LLC; and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Living Essentials”) commenced this action alleging that defendants have been involved in a widespread scheme to manufacture, distribute, and sell counterfeit 5-hour ENERGY drinks bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks and copyrig
Conaway v. Deanepublic domain
HARRELL, J. Frank Conaway, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, and other circuit court clerks throughout Maryland (“the Clerks”) denied marriage licenses to certain same-sex couples. The Clerks denied those applications pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 2006 Repl.Vol.), Family Law Article, § 2-201 (hereinafter “Family Law § 2-201”).1 The Cir
Glass v. Commissionerpublic domain
NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th