Cases

People v Mateo (2025 NY Slip Op 01877) People v Mateo 2025 NY Slip Op 01877 Decided on March 27, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Wilson (2025 NY Slip Op 01876) People v Wilson 2025 NY Slip Op 01876 Decided on March 27, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered August 10, 2015, resentencing defendant to a term of 22 years, unanimously affirmed. On remand from this Court (128 AD3d 612, 614 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 927 [2015]), the resentencing court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment (see Peop

People v Almodovar (2020 NY Slip Op 02164) People v Almodovar 2020 NY Slip Op 02164 Decided on April 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: Appellant, Roegester Grays, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County following his conviction by a jury on two counts of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence of alcohol (“homicide by vehicle-DUI”), one count of aggravated assault by vehicle while driving under

Williams v Laura Livery Corp. (2019 NY Slip Op 07540) Williams v Laura Livery Corp. 2019 NY Slip Op 07540 Decided on October 22, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Matter of Figueroa v Fabrizio (2019 NY Slip Op 04120) Matter of Figueroa v Fabrizio 2019 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on May 28, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Gische, J., J.

Matter of Samy F. v Fabrizio (2019 NY Slip Op 06374) Matter of Samy F. v Fabrizio 2019 NY Slip Op 06374 Decided on August 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Gische, J., J.

868 A.2d 188 (2005) 2005 ME 26 STATE of Maine v. Joshua PATTERSON. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: December 8, 2004. Decided: February 9, 2005. *189 R. Christopher Almy, District Attorney, C. Daniel Wood, Asst. Dist. Attorney, Bangor, for State. Seth D. Harrow, The Silver Law F

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint in its Entirety, filed March 29, 2013 (Doc. 26)(“MTD & MSJ.”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court will dismiss for failure to state a claim or gr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Paula Forney, filed May 3, 2013 (Doc. 43)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court should dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Paula Forney under rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Batchelder, J. The plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the superior court which dismissed their actions claiming damages for the parental loss of a child’s society, and their actions alleging strict liability against the defendant Capitol City Shows, Inc. We affirm. These actions arose from an amusement ride accident which occurred on July 1, 1981, at a carnival in North Conway. The defendant Capitol City Show

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEAHER, District Judge. After a fourth trial in 19811, petitioner, a State prisoner, was convicted and is serving concurrent sentences of 25 years to life *1529for murder in the second degree, 7V2 to 15 years for attempted murder in the second degree, and 3V2 to 7 years for

Rugg, C.J. • This is an action of contract by merchants resident in Buenos Aires, Argentina, who seek to' recover damages against the defendant, a banking institution of this Commonwealth, arising from its refusal to accept and pay four drafts aggregating over $2,000,000 drawn by them on the defendant under a letter of credit issued by it in their favor. The conditions out of which the case arises were the great • scarcity of sug