Cases

06/30/2026 DA 25-0437 Case Number: DA 25-0437 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2026 MT 136 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ANN LAFFERTY PFEIFER-MURPHY, Deceased. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District,

August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA

DALIANIS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority that the petitioner is not an employee of the city of Manchester. Because I believe that the board is not equitably estopped *731from denying the petitioner pension benefits, however, I find it unnecessary to remand this case and, therefore, respectfully di

People v Haims (2022 NY Slip Op 02142) People v Haims 2022 NY Slip Op 02142 Decided on March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C

627 F.Supp. 129 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Doris THOMAS, et al., Defendants. Doris THOMAS, Cross-Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF MAYWOOD, et al., Cross-Defendants. Carol JAROCKI, et al., Intervenors-Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 83 C 3752. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. August 27, 1985. <

591 F.3d 613 (2010) In re PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, *614 Sandra Kirkland; Patricia Lawton-Wilson; Monica Lee; Katherine Maiello; Dorothy Mallette; Nola McAdoo; Lillian Meeks; Brenda Nicholson; Joanne Nickel; Barbara Norvell; Reva Orr; Regina Parker; April Patterson; Kathleen Perkinson; Donna Peters; Joanne Peterson; Mary Phillips; Viola Plieseis; Joyce Podhayski; Kathleen Preston; Lydia Ross; Diane S

*395 SMITH, Circuit Judge. Ninety-two plaintiffs 1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri’s Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duties; (3) cons

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-OCT-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 48 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2024 02:30 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

679 F.3d 657 (2012) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, Janet Boot, Intervenor Plaintiff, Remcey Jeunenne Peeples; Monika Starke, Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC., Defendant-Appellee. *658 Equal Employment Advisory Council; Chamber of Commerce of the United States; Society for Human Resource Management; National Federation of Independent Busin

CALABRIA, Judge. Defendants appeal from multiple orders and judgments entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiffs on claims involving the restrictive covenants governing the Gull Harbor subdivision (“Gull Harbor”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background On 11 April 1972, developer Walton W. Smith (“Smith”) acquired a large

66 F.3d 659 John T. HENNESSY; Michael B. High; William A. Bracken;Larry Gibson; Martha C. Hitchcock; Laurence A.Liss; Ken Mancini; George S. Rapp;Roberta Griffin Torian; Frank J. Sorierov.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver forMeritor Savings Bank (D.C. Civil No. 93-cv-05589).Thomas CALLAHANv.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver forMeritor Savings Bank (D.C. Civil No. 94-cv

This appeal concerns the dismissal of the plaintiff’s second action concerning her forty-nine day, involuntary hospitalization at Westwood Lodge in 1983. Two orders are appealed from. One is a judgment dismissing the second action on the ground of collateral estoppel. The second is a denial of a motion for reconsideration of that judgment. *921 The Earlier Action.

869 N.E.2d 401 (2007) The NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, Trustee of the Caroline E. Haskell Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Yates KNOX, Michael Lloyd Yates, Elizabeth Lee Loughran, Deborah Lee Heller, Walter W. Bell, not individually but as Trustee of The Deborah Lee Trust, Cynthia Healy Ellis, Winston Healy Jr., Jonathan L. Healy, Elizabeth Condict Lange, Carolyn G. Lange Clarke, Stacy Lange Columbo, Connie Lee Foster, Gerritt Davis Foster, III

293 S.W.3d 478 (2009) Jennifer KNOX, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Thomas A. MORRIS, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 92186. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. September 1, 2009. *479 Ronald D. Kwentus, Jr., Maryland Heights, MO, for appellant. Daniel L. Goldberg, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.</

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Chelsea Smith (“Chelsea”), by and through her parents, Linda and Deane Smith (“Chelsea’s Parents”), 1 initiated a proceeding before the Bureau of Special Education Appeals (“BSEA”), pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400

921 S.W.2d 676 (1996) Dorothy Etta HOELSCHER, Jeffrey A. Hoelscher, Linda Hoelscher and Nina Nordwald, Appellants, v. Dean R. SIMMEROCK and Doris M. Simmerock, Respondents. No. WD 50903. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 14, 1996. *677 Robert C. Jones, Alan L. Farkas, Jones, Korum, Waltrip & Jones, Clayton, for

Nickerson, Gary A., J. INTRODUCTION This action involves a dispute between neighboring landowners. In this case, the plaintiffs, Dr. Warren Woods and Joann Woods (the “Woodses”), claim that their oceanfront property has been damaged by their neighbors’ construction and maintenance of their coastal rock revetments.3 The Woodses seek relief against their neighbors (Linda