Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 21-2028 DIANNE M. DONALDSON and DALE A. DONALDSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

757 N.W.2d 849 (2008) 2008 WI App 148 DONALDSON v. VILLAGE OF JOHNSON CREEK. No. 2007AP1643. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. August 14, 2008. Unpublished Opinion. Affirmed.

NEWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, JOHNSON, HERVEY, ALCALA, RICHARDSON and YEARY, JJ., joined. If a defendant pleads true to an enhancement paragraph, can a court of appeals imply a trial court’s finding of true regarding that prior conviction used for enhancement when the trial judge, in his own words,'refused to make such a finding? No. W

631 S.E.2d 443 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 407 DONALDSON v. The STATE. No. A06A0814. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 15, 2006. Certiorari Denied September 18, 2006. *445 Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, William C. Head, Atlanta, for appellant. Gregory R. Barton, Solicitor-General, for appe

DONALDSON, Judge. Robert Bradford Johnson (“the former husband”) appeals from a judgment of the Blount Circuit Court (“the trial court”) modifying the judgment previously entered divorcing the former husband and Claire Wilcox Johnson (“the former wife”). We affirm the trial court’s judgment insofar as it addresses the former wife’s use of a specific residence, child support, and an award of attorney’s fees to the former wi

THOMAS, Judge. Gina Johnson (“the wife”) and Cary Casey Johnson (“the husband”) were married on April 25, 1997. There are three children of the marriage (“the children”). On June 20, 2012, the wife filed a complaint in the Bibb Circuit Court seeking a divorce from the husband. She requested a'division of the assets and debts of the marriage, an award of custody of the children, and awards of - child- support, of alimony, and

DONALDSON, Judge. Sara Johnson (“the wife”) appeals the Madison Circuit Court’s judgment entered on December 17, 2013, divorcing her from Travis Johnson (“the husband”) and addressing child-custody and child-support issues. Because the record does not contain a sufficient evidentiary basis to support the judgment, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. The parties were married on February 22, 2

359 S.W.2d 810 (1962) J. Earl DONALDSON, Appellant, v. Helen M. JOHNSON and Willie A. Johnson, Appellees. No. 5-2727. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 10, 1962. *811 Charles L. Gocio, Bentonville, Ulys A. Lovell, Springdale, for appellant. Dickson, Putman, Millwee & Davis, Fayetteville, for appellees. BOHLIN

Johnson, Judge. In a two-count indictment, David Earl Donaldson was charged with simple battery, committed by intentionally causing physical harm to a person over 65 years of age, and robbery. After being found guilty on both counts, Donaldson appeals, asserting only that there was insufficient evidence to support the robbery conviction. The simple battery, with special circumstances, conviction is affirmed.

In re Donaldson, Mary D.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. D, No. 448-037; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 99 CW 2793 Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 22145) is denied.

MOORE, Judge. Girish Modi appeals from ,a judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the circuit court”) in favor of Jalisa Johnson in an appeal from the Montgomery District Court (“the district court”) in a garnishment action. In this appeal, Modi also challenges that same judgment to the extent the circuit court dismissed that part of the appeal in which Modi had attempted to appeal from the underlying district-cou

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KIMBERLY DONALDSON, Appellant, v. THOMAS HAHN, Appellee. No. 4D2024-1461 [January 8, 2025] Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Pa

PER CURIAM. Kenneth Roy Johnson, who is represented by an attorney, appeals from an order of the Monroe Circuit Court (“the trial court”) denying his purported “motion to alter, amend, or vacate.” Johnson initially appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, which transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975. Johnson’s appellate brief fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2

On Application for Rehearing DONALDSON, Judge. Jefferson S. Dunn, Gwendolyn Mosley, Carter Davenport, Derrick Carter, Willie Bryant, J. Peavey, Kevin Teal, and Randy Daniels (“the defendants”) have filed an application for rehearing and a motion to suspend the application of Rule 40(a)(2), Ala. R.App. P., which states: “No party can, as a matter of right, apply for a rehearing unless, on or

PITTMAN, Judge. Dr. Barbara Johnson, a clinical psychologist, has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Shelby Circuit Court to vacate an order denying Johnson’s motion to quash a subpoena calling for Johnson to produce records relating to Johnson’s evaluation and treatment of T.C., a minor child (“the child”), and to enter an order quashing the subpoena.1 We grant the petition

IN RE: Donaldson, Anthony; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of St. Tammany 22nd Judicial District Court Div. “E” Number 183,569; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number KW98 2644 Denied. Repetitive. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D). JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

DONALDSON, Judge. Emmett Gary Frosolono and Linda Brewer Frosolono appeal the order of the Randolph Circuit Court (“the trial court”) finding in favor of a married couple, Kenneth Jates and Kimberly Yates, and tyvo brothers, Glenn Edward Johnson and Donald Andreyv Johnson, on their adverse-possession claims. Because it was taken from a, nonfinal judgment, we dismiss the appeaj. . . Facts and Procedur

DONALDSON, Judge. Rule 77(d), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides a procedure whereby a party claiming lack of timely notice of the entry of an appeal-able order or judgment may seek an extension of time to appeal. This case presents an unusual procedural scenario in which the Limestone Circuit Court (“the trial court”) granted George H. Johnson and Gloria J.- Johnson’relief ; pursuant to Rule 77(d) by, extending the time to appeal

2 Cal.App.4th 1614 (1992) 4 Cal. Rptr.2d 59 THOMAS DONALDSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DANIEL E. LUNGREN, as Attorney General, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B055657. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. January 29, 1992. *1617 COUNSEL Garf