Cases

McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. In a one-count indictment, Donald Ray Brown was charged with knowingly and intentionally possessing cocaine, a Schedule II Controlled Substance, with an intent to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1988). Brown filed a motion to suppress the use at trial of the $7,815 in currency and the eight Ziploc baggies of cocaine found u

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. In a one-count indictment, Donald Ray Elliott was charged with willfully taking by force, violence, and intimidation $3,900 in currency from one Tamatha White, a teller in the Carlsbad National Bank, Carlsbad, New Mexico, a bank which was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). A jury found Elliott g

PRESIDING JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The trial judge in this case made two incorrect rulings that would require this court to reverse the trial court. First, when the trial court denied Dr. Detorre’s motion in limine to bar plaintiffs expert, Dr. Gomez, from tes

610 N.E.2d 118 (1993) 242 Ill. App.3d 320 182 Ill.Dec. 694 Lester GREENFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAY STAMM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-92-0125. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February 26, 1993. Rehearing Denied April 14, 1993. *119

PER CURIAM. The district court denied habeas corpus relief to appellant Plaskett who is confined in an Oklahoma penitentiary serving a 5-year sentence for second-degree burglary. In the state court Plas-kett was represented by retained counsel. When sentence was pronounced on November 29, 1966, the state court ordered that Plaskett

OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. Because it had insufficient insurance coverage to pay the plaintiff a reasonable settlement, the target defendant in this diversity personal injury suit “borrowed” money from one of several alleged joint tortfeasors. Repayment was conditioned upon the defendant’s recovery of contribution from other tortfeasors. Rejecting a contention that the “loan” was in fact a set

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00054-CR

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, nineteen chiropractors led by Dr. Mark A. Beck d/b/a Beck Chiropractic Clinics, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants, as well as several other adverse rulings, in this antitrust case. 1 Defendants are a group of insurance companies: Farm Bureau

The opinion of the court was delivered by Johnson, J.: Keshia Denise Williams was convicted of aggravated battery for stabbing her long-time friend, Sandra Kelly, multiple times in the head with a steak knife during an altercation inside of Williams’ home. On appeal, Williams claimed, inter alia, that the trial court should have given certain instructions even though Williams did not request them. W

PER CURIAM. Donald Henderson, a state prisoner, filed what was denominated a “medical civil action,” pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, charging that the failure of Kansas State Penitentiary officials to provide him with prescribed corrective shoes constituted cruel and unusual punishment. Appellant’s pro se complaint seeking, inter alia, damages and release, was treated by the distr

Cite as 2021 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2021 ANNUAL ATTORNEY- LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2021 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2021. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an automatic suspension on th

McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. The central issue in this appeal is whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., preempts certain provisions of the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 85 O.S. § 1, et seq. The district court held that ERISA did not preempt. We agree and therefore affirm. Some background. Contract Services Network, Inc., h

JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge. { 1 Donald W. Duncan appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his petition alleging a tort claim against the City of Stroud. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp.2013, ch. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate briefing. In the district court, the Ci

903 F.2d 290 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 1271, 115 Lab.Cas. P 35,351 William Ronald HARTMAN; Peter Angel Vazquez; Lewis A.Cooper; Stanley B. Bower; William O. Moose; Elbert F.Green; Ray W. Swarthout; Michael J. Smith; John P.McWilliams; John A. Maruca; William Scott McKay; CharlesG. Middleton; William N. Moultne; James W. Trollinger;Howard N. Piansky; James E. Kiser; Donald M. Keys;

492 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2007) CITY OF RIALTO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants. And Related Cases. Nos. EDCV 04-00079-PSG(SSx), EDCV 04-00759-SGL (SSx). United States District Court, C.D. California. May 25, 2007. *1194 Amy Matthew, Arthur F. Coon, Miller Starr Regalia, Christian M. C

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: This maritime cause of action arose when appellant Williams-McWilliams Company, dredging under government contract in Atchafalaya Bay, encountered and damaged a natural gas pipeline belonging to appellee *947 Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company. Michigan Wisconsin brought

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court: on (i) the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint to Recover Damages for Discrimination and Retaliation and for Violations of Constitutional Rights, filed November 6, 2013 (Doc. 38)(“MSJ”); and (ii) the Motion for Summary Jud

930 S.W.2d 823 (1996) Donald Ray MOFFATT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 13-95-230-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. August 29, 1996. *825 Gene A. Garcia, Corpus Christi, for Appellant. Luis V. Saenz, District & County Attorney, John A. Olson, Asst. County & District Attorney, Brownsvi

OSCN Found Document:DUNCAN v. CITY OF STROUD OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge, dissenting. The prevailing opinion affirms an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding appellee benefits for temporary total disability. I dissent for the following reasons. Appellee was referred to Dr. John L. Wilson, an orthopedic surgeon. Appellee saw Dr. Wilson on October 13. Dr. Wilson treated appellee with medication and presc