Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) MARK T. ESPER, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (September 13, 2019) The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ [213-1] Motion to Compel Production of Docume

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) JAMES N. MATTIS, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 24, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." A formal Presidential Memorandum followed on August 25, 2017. Before the 2017 Presidential Memorandum, the Department of Defense had announced that openly transgende

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) JAMES MATTIS, et al., Defendants ORDER (November 30, 2018) Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Preliminary Injunction Pendi

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge *540On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." This lawsuit followed. On October 30, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary injunction, the effect

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 6, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter anno

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The work of this court, and more broadly of the federal Judiciary, is to resolve disputes between parties; that is what the court endeavors to do today in ruling on the two motions before it. Plaintiffs in both cases are refugees, who find themselves in dire circumstances, their family members who yearn to be reunited with them, and hum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 6, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the U

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge *1175I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Defendants Donald Trump, United States Department of State, Rex Tillerson, United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), United States Customs and Border Protection, Kevin McAleenan, Michele James, Office of the Director of Natio

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Defendants Donald Trump, United States Department of State, Rex Tillerson, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection, Kevin McAleenan, Michael James, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Elaine Duke, and Daniel Coats's (collectively, "Defendants") motion fo

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are two motions: (1) Consolidated Plaintiffs Jewish Family Services of Seattle, Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley, Allen Vaught, Afkab Mohamed Hussein, John Does 1-3 and 7, and Jane Does 4-6's (collectively, "JFS Plaintiffs") motion to reinstate their request for limited discovery1 (2

MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 30, 2017) COLLEEN KÓLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge . On July 26, 2017, President Donald, J. Trump,issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capa

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: This case concerns an alleged fraudulent scheme to promote certain third-party companies offering multi-level marketing and training programs. The Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") asserts racketeering and conspiracy claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

20-1228 (L) Doe v. The Trump Corporation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 (Argued: December 01, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2021) Docket Nos. 20-1228-cv/20-1278-cv JANE DOE, LUKE LOE, RICHARD ROE, MARY MOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL

Trump v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 25118) [*1] Trump v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 25118 Decided on May 20, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 31 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JOHN DOE #1, et al., No. 19-36020 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-1743-SI v.

Trump v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 25118) [*1] Trump v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 25118 Decided on May 20, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE #1; JUAN RAMON No. 19-36020 MORALES; JANE DOE, # 2; IRIS ANGELINA CASTRO; BLAKE DOE; D.C. No. BRENDA VILLARRUEL; LATINO 3:19-cv-01743-SI NETWORK; JANE DOE, # 3; GABINO SORIANO CASTELLANOS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States;

FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 20 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE #1; et al.,