Cases

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doe v. Greenville City Schools, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4618.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any t

NARICK, Senior Judge. The question presented for our review is whether Appellant, Donald J. Krauss, is a “park guard” within the meaning of the Act of June 28, 1935, which is popularly called the “Heart and Lung Act”1 (Act). The trial court determined that Appellant did not qualify as a park guard, and, therefore, was ineligible for benefits under the Act. We reverse. The part

642 N.E.2d 541 (1994) INDIANA CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, Alpha Blackburn As Chairman of the Indiana Civil Rights Commission and Debra Salais, Appellants-Defendants, v. DELAWARE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Appellee-Plaintiff.[1] No. 49A02-9309-CV-487. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District. November 17, 1994. *543 Jacquel

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Introduction... 1057 I.Findings of Fact... 1060 A. Procedural Background... 1060 B. The Evidence in the Record... 1061 1. The Parties... 1062 2. Th

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Del. (2022 NY Slip Op 01078) Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Del. 2022 NY Slip Op 01078 Decided on February 17, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York S

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY DAVID NAPLES, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) NEW CASTLE COUNTY, a Municipal ) Corporation, DAVID M. CULVER, ) individually and in his official capacity, ) C.A. No. N11C-06-242 PRW GEORGE HAGGERTY, indivi

142 N.J. 1 (1995) 662 A.2d 367 JOHN DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME), INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. DEBORAH PORITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued May 2, 1995. Decided July 25, 1995. <

ORDER GRANTING THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA’S AND CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S MOTIONS TO ENJOIN SECTION 9(a) OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 13768 William H. Orrick, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This ease involves Executive Order 13768, “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” which, in addition to outlining a number of immigration enforcement policies, purports

395 F.3d 932 John DOE I, individually & as Administrator of the Estate of his deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Jane Doe I, on behalf of herself, as Administratrix of the Estate of her deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; John Doe II; John Doe III; John Doe IV; John Doe V; Jane Doe II; Jane Doe III; John Doe VI; John Doe VII; John Doe VIII; John Doe IX; John Doe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Paula Williams filed this suit pro se against Cook County, the Office of the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, the Cook County Juvenile Probation Department (the and its Chief Executive Officer, Michael Rohan, the Office of the Independent Inspector General of Cook County (collectively the “Co

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants the County of Sacramento, the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), Child Protective Services (“CPS”), CPS employees, and Sacramento County counsel based on an investigation by CPS an

DISSENTING OPINION BY Judge McGINLEY. I respectfully dissent to the majority’s conclusion that “[t]he arbitrator resolved the meaning of different provisions in the CBA in favor of the specific provision in Article 29, which specified a female must be involved in transporting female detainees. We cannot say that the arbitrator’s interpretation was not rationally derived from the CBA.” Opinion at 1290-91.

331 F.Supp. 1010 (1971) Robert J. MASON et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE, Defendant, and Harry A. McNichol et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 71-1640. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. September 23, 1971. John M. Gallagher, Jr., Jack Brian, Richard Brian, DiSanti & Hamilton, Upper Darby, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Green, J.: The decedent, Joshua C. Pemberton (Josh), shot and lulled himself with a shotgun purchased from John’s Sports Center, Inc. (JSC). Josh’s parents, Jay and Susan Pemberton, both as personal representatives of Josh’s estate and in their own capacity (collectively, the Pembertons) sued JSC. JSC moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. On appeal, the Pembertons contend that the trial court erred in determ

OPINION BY Judge McCULLOUGH. Lancaster County (County) petitions for review of the May 15, 2012 final order of *1102the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) that dismissed the County’s exceptions to the hearing examiner’s decision and order, concluding that the County violated sections 1201(a)(1) and (3) of the Public Employe Relations Act (PER

138 P.3d 963 (2006) Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-Poole and Michael Serkin-Poole; Vegavahini Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan; Elizabeth Reis and Barbara Steele; and Michelle Esguerra; and Boo Torres De Esguera, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Recor

608 F.3d 406 (2010) Michael CROWE; Stephen Crowe; Cheryl A. Crowe; Judith Ann Kennedy; Shannon Crowe, a minor, through guardian ad litem Stephan Crowe; Zachary Treadway; Joshua David Treadway; Michael Lee Treadway; Tammy Treadway; Janet Haskell; Margaret Susan Houser; Christine Huff; Gregg Houser; Aaron Houser, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; The City of Oceanside; Chris McDonough; Gary Hoover; Summer Stephan; Lawrence Blum; City of

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER The opinion filed on January 14, 2010, 2010 WL 114956, is hereby amended as follows. The paragraph beginning at the bottom of Slip. Op. page 1115 and continuing onto page 1116 is to be deleted and the following inserted. We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to: (1) Michael and Aaron’s Fif

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DANIEL ANTHONY MILLER,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,  No. 05-2250 MARYLAND, A Body Corporate and Politic; JOHN L. DOUGANS, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland