Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “DIVERSIFIED RECOVERY BUREAU LLC”
Evans v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLCpublic domain
Flaum, Circuit Judge. *342This appeal concerns four consolidated cases involving similar alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(8). Plaintiffs defaulted on credit cards, and defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates ("PRA"), an Illinois debt collection agency, bought the accounts for collection
Slick v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff Donna M. Slick alleges that defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) when it attempted to collect a delinquent debt. The Court previously granted Slick’s motion for partial summary judgment, and denied PRA’s cross-motion for summary
Washington v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs complaint, which alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. See [75] and [89]. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants in part and denies in part
Datta v. Asset Recovery Solutions, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Meena Arthur Datta (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendant Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC (“Defendant”).1 Before the Court are the parties’
Scott v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
.ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge This matter comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (Portfolio),' which Plaintiff Denise Scott (Plaintiff) resists, and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability filed by Plaintiff, which Portfolio resists. The parties have not requested a healing, and the Court finds á hearin
Diversified Striping v. Krauspublic domain
2022 UT App 91 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DIVERSIFIED STRIPING SYSTEMS INC., KMB EQUIPMENT LLC, KEVIN BECK, AND PAMELA K. BECK, Appellants and Cross-appellees, v. JOE KRAUS, FLJ LLC, AND NATIONAL STRIPING INC., Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20200309-CA Filed July 21, 2022
Rush v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCpublic domain
OPINION WOLFSON, United States District Judge: This matter arises out of a Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Alma and Gregory Rush (collectively, “Plaintiffs’”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., as well as a state law claim for invasion of privacy. Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Defendant” or “Portfolio”) filed a motion fo
Puglisi v. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLCpublic domain
822 F.Supp.2d 218 (2011) Michael PUGLISI, Plaintiff, v. DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant. No. 08-CV-5024 (JFB)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2011. *220 Adam J. Fishbein, Cedarhurst, NY, for plaintiff. Lawrence W. Rader, New York, NY, for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND OR
Diversified Bldg. Co., LLC v. Nader Enters., LLCpublic domain
Diversified Bldg. Co., LLC v Nader Enters., LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 06047) Diversified Bldg. Co., LLC v Nader Enters., LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 06047 Decided on November 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Davis v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAYLOR, District Judge. This is an action claiming unlawful debt collection. It arises out of a series of telephone calls between plaintiff Jamie Davis and various employees of defendant Diversified Consultants, Inc., a debt collection agency. Davis contends that, by the mode and manner in which they called him, DCI and its employees viol
Lardner v. Diversified Consultants Inc.public domain
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, D.E. 18, filed on January 6, 2014, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, D.E. 30, filed on March 7, 2014. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiffs Motion, D.E. 24, on February 24, 2014, and Plaintiff filed her Reply, D.E. 29, on March 3, 2014.
Daniel Haney v. Portfolio Recovery Associatespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Daniel Haney asserted claims against a debt collector, Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. ("PRA"), and its attorneys, Gamache & Myers, P.C. ("Gamache"), under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ("FDCPA"). The defendants m
Peter Bowse v. Portfolio Recovery Associatespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1773, 17‐1860, 17‐1866, 17‐2622, 17‐2756 & 18‐1374 KATHERINE EVANS, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant‐Appellant. and
Farm Bureau v. Westonpublic domain
2023 UT App 136 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. JARED H. WESTON, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, PREMATIC SERVICE CORPORATION, AND WILSON GREEN INSURANCE AGENCY, Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20180699-CA Filed November 9, 2023 Third Di
Haney v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.public domain
PER CURIAM. Daniel Haney asserted.claims against a debt collector, Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C, (“PRA”), and its attorneys, Gamache & Myers, P.C. (“Gamache”), under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”). The defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), and the district court granted the motion. We affirm in part, reverse in part, a
Peter Bowse v. Portfolio Recovery Associatespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1773, 17‐1860, 17‐1866, 17‐2622, 17‐2756 & 18‐1374 KATHERINE EVANS, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant‐Appellant. and
Gamma USA, Inc. v. Pavarini McGovern, LLCpublic domain
Gamma USA, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 03380) Gamma USA, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 03380 Decided on June 05, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p
Valle v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.public domain
Order on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Robert N. Scola, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Ruby Valle brings this suit against First National Collection Bureau, Inc. (“FNCB”) for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices- Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., (“FDCPA”) and the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, Fla.. Stat. § 559.55 et seq., (“FCCPA”). This matt
Donna Dinaples v. MRS BPO LLCpublic domain
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Five years ago, in Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing , 765 F.3d 299 (3d Cir. 2014), we held that a debt collector violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"),
Meyer v. Fay Servicing, LLCpublic domain
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1238Before the Court is Defendant Fay Servicing, LLC's ("Fay Servicing") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) filed on March 12, 2019, and Defendant McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC's ("MRLP") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) filed on April 1, 2019. On March 26, 2019, and April 22, 2019, Plaintiff