Cases

873 N.E.2d 514 (2007) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth R. SCHNEIDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-05-0819. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. August 3, 2007. *516 Thomas A. Lilien, Deputy Defender, and Paul J. Glaser (Court-appointed), Office of State Appellate Defender, Elgin, for Kenn

No. 2--05--0819 Filed: 8-3-07 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ILLINOIS,

OPINION HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge. The municipality of Englewood, Ohio, passed an ordinance banning all door-to-door canvassing and soliciting between 6 P.M. and 9 A.M. Ohio Citizen Action challenged this curfew and other provisions of the ordinance on First Amendment grounds. The district court upheld the

McHugh, J. I. BACKGROUND This is an action in which four of the partners of Wellington Management Company seek on behalf of themselves and their partners injunctive relief and damages against a former partner who left the firm to start his own business.1 Pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 42(b), the claim for injunctive relief was severed before trial from the claim for damages.

*389 Opinion of the Court RYAN, Circuit Judge:1 A general court-martial sitting at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, convicted appellant, Major David P. Schneider, contrary to his pleas, of attempted premeditated murder, conduct unbecoming an officer by committing adultery, and conduct unbecoming an officer by committing perj

OPINION OF THE COURT De GIULIO, Senior Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial for attempted murder of his wife and two specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman by committing perjury and by having sexual intercourse with and otherwise engaging in a sexual or other improper affair with a woman not his wife in violation of Articles 80 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Just

380 Mass. 350 (1980) 403 N.E.2d 350 HELEN UPHAM vs. CHATEAU de VILLE DINNER THEATRE, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. December 13, 1979. April 9, 1980. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, & ABRAMS, JJ. Gerald F. Williamson for the plaintiff. John D. Dwyer for the defendant.

796 F.2d 1547 55 USLW 2083 CITY OF WATSEKA, County of Iroquois and State of Illinois, aHome Rule Municipality, and Ernest A. Grove, Mayorof Watseka, individually and in hisOfficial Capacity, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ILLINOIS PUBLIC ACTION COUNCIL and American Civil LibertiesUnion, Defendants- Appellees. No. 84-2605. United States Court of Appeals,

Holmes, J., dissenting. I cannot concur in the decision of the majority and therefore must respectfully register my dissent. I have no quarrel with the scholarly presentation of the history of liquor regulation in Kansas or the principles of statutory construction under our constitutional form of government as set forth in the majority opinion. It is the application of these principles to the issues in this case where we disagree.

HOUSER, Commissioner. To the petition of Ray F. Schneider for divorce Myrtle B. Schneider filed a general denial and a cross-claim for separate maintenance. The Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis found for plaintiff, granted him a divorce and dismissed defendant’s cross-claim. Defendant appealed on these grounds: error in granting a divorce because plaintiff was not an innocent and injured party and the evidence was insu

Mrs. Louise Manion Schneider is appealing from a judgment of the district court dismissing her suit against her husband, Claude W. Schneider, for separation from bed and board based on cruel treatment, outrages, and excesses toward her. The specific allegations upon which the plaintiff based her action are that (1) "about six months after their marriage, her * * * husband cursed and abused her without any cause or provocation * * * to such an extent that she was compelled to leave him

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SAYLOR, United States District Judge This is a civil action arising out of an investigation conducted by a university into alleged sexual misconduct. Jurisdiction is ■ based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff “John Doe” was an undergraduate student at defendant Brandéis University. For nearly two years, he and another male Brand

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. ■ After Plaintiff S.B.’s junior high school principals discovered that she sent what they termed a “lewd” image of a female friend to other students,- they sent her. to a disciplinary learning program for 30 days. In the year preceding that transfer, S.B. alleges that she was subject to repeated bullying on and off campus. She now asserts a vari

MEMORANDUM RESTREPO, District Judge. Moroccan clementines, Peruvian grapes and New Zealand kiwis travel an Odyssean journey to arrive on United States grocery-store shelves. Among other obstacles, there is customs clearance: When imported perishable goods reach U.S. shores, they must be inspected, documented and approved by U.S. Customs and Border Protection before they are shipped to their fin

Judgment rendered June 24, 2020. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 53,526-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM M. SCHOOLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-1376 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. ME

*535 DECISION and ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge.1 I. INTRODUCTION Michael Deno (“Deno”) brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner

2017 WI 22 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP207 COMPLETE TITLE: Scott Smith, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, Alpha Cargo Technology, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Greg Kleynerman, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

[Cite as Carr v. Carr, 2016-Ohio-6986.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY DEVIN CARR, : CASE NOS. CA2015-02-015 Appellant/Cross-Appellee, : CA2015-03-020 :

622 F.3d 75 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Arthur Michael KINSELLA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-1201. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 10, 2010. Decided October 14, 2010. *76 Tina Schneider, for appellant. Renée M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom