Cases

Petition for certification denied.

Petition for certification denied.

OPINION GREENAWAY, District Judge. Presently before the Court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Gina Morales-Evans (“Evans”) alleges that she was sexually harassed by her supervisor, defendant William Coleman, during her tenure at the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”), in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”),

273 F.3d 346 (3rd Cir. 2001) JANET L. EVANS,v.PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY; ANGELO DINOME; LAURA TOOLE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.JANET L. EVANS APPELLANT,v.PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY; ANGELO DINOME; LAURA TOOLE. Nos. 00-1817 and 00-1919 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued July

113 F.3d 1313 Donato P. LATESSA; Victor R. Latessa, Appellants,v.NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION; Santo Lalomia, Individuallyand Officially as a Member of the New Jersey RacingCommission; Oliver R. Kovacs, Individually and Officiallyas a Member of the New Jersey Racing Commission; Stuart O.Goldsmith, Individually and Officially as a Member of theNew Jersey Racing Commission; William E. McGlynn,Individually and Offi

88 F.3d 192 71 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 143,68 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,110Evelyn DELLI SANTI, Appellant in No. 94-5331,v.CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES; Continental Casualty Company;Richard Farah.Evelyn DELLI SANTIv.CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES; Continental Casualty Company;Richard Farah CNA Insurance Companies;Continental Casualty Company, Appellants in No. 94-5347. N

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. I. Plaintiff-appellant Gerard Cardenas, a Mexican-American, was hired as of January 29, 1990 as the manager of the Office Systems Unit in the Information Systems Division (“ISD”) of New Jersey’s Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”) following the retirement of Joseph Ribsam. Car

957 F.Supp. 1391 (1997) Frances LEE-PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 94-5355 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 20, 1997. *1392 Arthur N. Martin, Jr., Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff. Peter Verniero, Attorney General, Robert A. Shire,

Baylson, District Judge I. Introduction This case involves a most egregious violation of First Amendment rights, in the context of a sheriff's sale. After a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs, the Defendants, City of Philadelphia and Edward Chew, moved for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, or remittitur, asserting errors in the Court's jury instructions and

58 F.Supp.2d 435 (1999) Robert SCULLY, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF HAWTHORNE, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 98-1473(AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 28, 1999. *436 *437 *438 David G. Uffelman, Pinto, Rodgers & Uffelman, Morristown,

193 F.Supp.2d 789 (2002) Gayle MANCUSO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, Defendant. No. CIV.A.00-4157(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 12, 2002. *790 *791 *792 Attorneys Hartman, Chartered by Frances A. Hartman, Katherine D. Hart

993 F.Supp. 255 (1998) Carl BOWLES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 96-4907 JEI. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 2, 1998. *256 *257 Linda B. Kenny, by Steven P. Monaghan, Red Bank, NJ, for Plaintiff. Dennis G. Knile, City Atty. of Camde

225 F.Supp.2d 514 (2002) Nicholas G. GHARZOUZI, Plaintiff, v. NORTHWESTERN HUMAN SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA, Richard Thomas, John Ceverdom, Jon C. Fogle, Sally Sheaffer, Alan Tezak and Joanne Edwards, Defendants. No. 01-CV-192. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 6, 2002. *515 *516

102 F.Supp.2d 577 (2000) Gina MORALES-EVANS, Plaintiff, v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, William Coleman, Jr., Robert E. Battle, Phillip J. Hill, and Harvey M. Goldstein, individually and as employees of Administrative Office of the Courts of the State of New Jersey, Defendants. No. Civ. 97-3214(JAG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

286 N.J. Super. 633 (1996) 670 A.2d 73 JOYCE BREITWIESER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted November 15, 1995. Decided January 25, 1996. *635 Before Judges KIN

181 F.3d 396 (3rd Cir. 1999) MICHAEL REGO, APPELLANT IN NO. 98-1386v.ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY OF PA., A/K/A ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY, A/K/A ARC COMPANY; ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC.MICHAEL REGO,v.ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY OF PA., A/K/A ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY, A/K/A ARC COMPANY; ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. ARC WATER TREATMENT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC., APPELLANT IN NO. 98-1616

208 F.3d 419 (3rd Cir. 2000) RONALD ALEXANDER; FAYE ALEXANDER; FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, INC., Appellants in No. 98-3597v.JOSEPH RIGA; MARIA A. RIGA a/k/a Carla AgnottiRONALD ALEXANDER; FAYE ALEXANDER; FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, INC.,v.JOSEPH RIGA; MARIA A. RIGA a/k/a Carla Agnotti Nos. 98-3597 and 98-3622 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

120 F.3d 1286 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 359,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,983Carmen L. ROBINSON; Nathaniel Hawthorne, Jr., Wife andHusband, Appellants,v.CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Earl Buford, Craig B. Edwards; James N.Dickerson. No. 95-3594. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Jan. 6, 1997.Decided July 14, 1997.

OPINION OF THE COURT VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Frani Feit appeals from the District Court’s decision granting Defendant-Appellee Great-West Life and Annuity Insurance Company’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), which resulted in the entry of judgment in favor of the defendant. For the following reasons, this Court will

MEMORANDUM OPINION GOLDBERG, District Judge. This case involves a defense and indemnification insurance coverage dispute stemming from a construction site accident. Presently before the Court are the cross-*650motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs, Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey (“Harleysville”) and Mega Construc