Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “DEBRA MARTINEZ GARCIA”
Wanzer v. Garciapublic domain
299 S.W.3d 821 (2009) Jerry WANZER, Appellant, v. Bernard GARCIA, Debra Vera, Hugh W. Green, Thomas Hinkle, Sylvia Peterson, Victor Martinez, Anthony Garcia, Kurt Stiefer, Kenneth Bright, Paul Morales, and Kelli Ward, Appellees. No. 04-08-00582-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. July 1, 2009. Rehearing Overruled September 16, 2009.
Javier Martinez Garcia v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Javier Martinez Garcia, Appellant Appeal from the County Court at Law of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. No. 06-23-00026-CR v. 22M1063CCL). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice
In Re Raymond Andrew Debra v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00271-CR IN RE Raymond Andrew DEBA, Relator Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Ire
People v. Martinezpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Bobby Martinez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00378-CR Bobby MARTINEZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
368 F.3d 1113 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Cruz INIGUEZ, aka Cruz Iniguez Garcia, Manuel Martinez, and Cruz Garcia Iniguez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Cruz Iniguez, aka Cruz Iniguez Garcia, Manuel Martinez, and Cruz Garcia Iniguez, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-50553. No. 01-50629. United States Co
United States v. Garcia-Oliverospublic domain
639 F.3d 380 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efrain GARCIA-OLIVEROS, a/k/a Miguel Angel Oliveros-Leon, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2748. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued March 1, 2011. Decided April 29, 2011. Debra Riggs Bonamici (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for
Garcia v. Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C.public domain
Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C. (2018 NY Slip Op 03339) Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C. 2018 NY Slip Op 03339 Decided on May 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York
Martinez v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Lawlor v. Orlando, 795 So.2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Garcia v. Lifemark Hosps. of Fla., 754 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Rafferman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 659 So.2d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Paddock v. Chacho, 522 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
E-FILED TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 12/1/2015 9:00:44 PM MARY LOUISE GARCIA COUNTY CLERK BY: M.W. B.
E-FILED TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 10/26/2015 4:21:10 PM MARY LOUISE GARCIA COUNTY CLERK
Nicholas Martinez v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jerry Wanzer v. Bernard Garciapublic domain
i i i i i i OPINION No. 04-08-00582-CV Jerry WANZER, Appellant v. Bernard GARCIA, Debra Vera, Hugh W. Green, Thomas Hinkle, Sylvia Peterson, Victor Martinez, Anthony Ga
Garcia v. Board Of Educationpublic domain
573 F.2d 676 Susan Anita GARCIA and Elizabeth Garcia, by and throughtheir parents and next friends, John L. Garcia and Millie D.Garcia, Rebecca Cardenas, Rachel Cardenas and LorraineCardenas, by and through their parent and next friend,Olivia Cardenas, Joseph Rodello and June Rodello, by andthrough their parents and next friends, Mercedes Rodello andStephen Rodello, Rene Martinez, by and through her parentand next friend
United States v. Iniguezpublic domain
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: We took this case en banc to clarify the meaning of the term “total punishment” as used in § 5G1.2(d) of the sentencing guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”). That section permits consecutive or stacked sentences under specified circumstances. We conclude that “total punishment” under § 5G1.2(d) is the sentence chosen by the district court “from the appropriate sentencing range,” United States
in Re Vcc, LLC, Vratsinas Construction Co., Nato Garcia D/B/A Nato Garcia Company, and Phi Service Agency, Inc.public domain
FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR
Garcia v. Board of Education, School District No. 1public domain
LEWIS, Circuit Judge. This appeal is apparently one of first impression and is premised on an unique factual situation. It involves a suit by members of a minority group seeking to stop the desegregation of their neighborhood school. The suit is an offspring of the lengthy Keyes v. School District No. 11 desegregation case which resulted, after some seven years of litig
Weaver v. New Mexico Human Services Departmentpublic domain
945 P.2d 70 (1997) 123 N.M. 705 1997-NMSC-039 Jennifer WEAVER, Kate Garcia, Rudolfo Martinez, Chris Luna, Patrick O'Rourke, and Chad Boutte, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NEW MEXICO HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 23761. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 6, 1997. *71
United States v. Diaz-Martinezpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Following a shootout near the Bayamon Judicial Center in Bayamon, Puerto Rico, defendant Diaz-Martinez was convicted of possessing firearms with obliterated serial numbers. He appeals, saying he was forced to go to trial with defense counsel not of his choosing, that the prosecutor improperly argued at closing, that his sentence was too harsh under the Gui
United States v. Diaz-Martinezpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 95-1083 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWIN DIAZ-M