Cases

People v Sanchez-Jimenez (2022 NY Slip Op 00323) People v Sanchez-Jimenez 2022 NY Slip Op 00323 Decided on January 19, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

*33 OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on two motions to compel discovery filed by plaintiffs, Donato Aponte-Navedo (“Mr.Aponte”) and Belkis Isabel Santiago-Martinez, against the defendants, Nalco Chemical Company (“Nalco”), Ashok Paul Duggal (“Mr.Duggal”), his wife Somarie Sant

BESOSA, District Judge. *237Defendants S2 Services Puerto Rico, LLC ("S2") and Rapiscan Systems, Inc. ("Rapiscan") move to dismiss the plaintiffs' amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil of Procedure 12(b)(1) ("Rule 12(b)(1)") and Federal Rule Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (" Rule 12(b)(6)"). (Docket No. 55.) Defendant Puerto Rico Ports

(2008) Deborah BOYAJIAN, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a Starbucks Cofffe Company, Defendant. No. 07-CV-214-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 24, 2008. ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GEORGE Z. SINGAL, Chief Judge. Before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 44) and Defendant's Mot

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On July 28, 2008, following a high-speed vehicular chase through a residential neighborhood, Yarmouth, Massachusetts police officer Christopher Van Ness shot and killed Andre Martins. Martins’ girlfriend, Camila Campos, who was also a passenger in Martins’ car, brought a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against

Once the ORM accepts any feasible claims, it assigns those claims to an impartial investigator to obtain evidence from the complainant and compile an investigative file. (Def. Ex. N at 4). An investigator is only authorized to investigate the claims accepted by ORM. (Id. ) On August 13, 2015, the Plaintiff requested leave to amend her Complaint, which was granted, to add additional claims that she was subjected to a hostile work environment based o

GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Plaintiff Juan Natal Pérez, his spouse, and their conjugal partnership sued Defendant Oriental Bank & Trust for discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, and retaliation under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101

Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys

54 Cal.3d 492 (1991) 816 P.2d 1309 286 Cal. Rptr. 283 LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners, v. MARCH FONG EU, as Secretary of State, etc., et al., Respondents; CALIFORNIANS FOR A CITIZEN GOVERNMENT, Intervener. Docket No. S019660. Supreme Court of California. October 10, 1991.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

37 A.3d 625 (2012) 304 Conn. 1 Maria PEREIRA et al. v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. Robert Walsh et al. v. State Board of Education et al. Laurayne Farrar-James et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Bridgeport et al. No. 18833. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 27, 2011. Decided February 28, 20

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV