Cases

MOORE, Judge. Wendell Simmons appeals from a judgment entered by the Baldwin Circuit Court ("the trial court") against him and in favor of Donald David Cook following a trial on the merits; Team Simco Lifter, Inc. ("Team Simco"), appeals from a default judgment entered against it by the trial court. We affirm the trial court's judgments as to both Simmons and Team Simco.

PER CURIAM. The prosecution appeals by leave granted 1 the trial court’s opinion and order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. *324 Th

ORDER PER CURIAM. David Simmons appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open rule 29.15 proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons

Former decision, 133 S.Ct. 2347.Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

757 F.Supp.2d 233 (2010) Jordan RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. M. SIMMONS, Institutional Steward, Donald Selsky, Director Special Housing Inmate Disciplinary Program, in their Individual Capacities, Defendants. No. 08-CV-6245L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 29, 2010. *234 Jordan Randolph, Riverhead, NY, pro se.</

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Alphonso Simmons (“plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, brings this action against Attica Correctional Facility Corrections Officer David Adamy (“Adamy”), Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) Deputy Superintendent of Programs Sandra Dolce (“Dolce”), and DOCS Deputy Commissioner an

Justice SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court. The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) allows plaintiffs to seek damages from the United States for certain torts committed by federal employees. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2674. Many of the FTCA's proced

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

638 F.Supp.2d 1180 (2009) Thomas N. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Darrin SIMMONS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:05-CV-01187-OWW. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 23, 2009. *1182 David Malcolm Gilmore, Gilmore Wood Vinnard & Magness, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff. Leonard Charles Herr, Attorneys at Law, LLP, Visalia,

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Patrick Simmons ) Docket No. 2016-07-0249 ) v. ) ) State File No. 83151-2015 RHA/Trenton, Inc., et al. ) ) ) Appeal from the C

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

MURRAY, J. Defendant, Sherry Lynn Simmons-Butler, appeals as of right a divorce judgment entered by the St. Clair Circuit Court. On appeal, defendant generally argues that the trial court erred in (1) its custody and parenting-time determinations with respect to the parties’ two minor children, (2) its division of the marital property and debt, and (3) its determinations regarding ch

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 402 Fed. Appx. 282.

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this housing discrimination case, a mother and son contend that an apartment complex illegally failed to accommodate the son's disability when considering his rental application. The son had a misdemeanor conviction for indecent exposure, and the apartment complex denied his application allegedly for that reason alone. The son then asserted his mental illness caused the act resu

693 S.E.2d 70 (2010) Dianna Brekke STORRIE, Petitioner Below, Appellant v. Christopher Michael SIMMONS, Respondent Below, Appellee and Charles D. Kittle, Petitioner Below, Appellee v. Susan R. Burke, Respondent Below, Appellant. Nos. 35289, 35445. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 2, 2010. Decided April 2, 2010.

27 A.3d 1065 (2011) 2011 VT 69 STATE of Vermont v. Graham SIMMONS. No. 10-066. Supreme Court of Vermont. June 23, 2011. *1066 David W. Gartenstein, Windham County Deputy State's Attorney, and Eric W. Gentino, Law Clerk (on the Brief), Brattleboro, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Allison N. Fulcher of Martin

190 S.W.3d 558 (2006) David SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 86236. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. May 2, 2006. *559 David Simmons, Bonne Terre, MO, Acting Attorney pro se. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Attorney, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. BOOKER T. SHAW, Ju

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Appellee-Petitioner Ernest Simmons was convicted in Pennsylvania state court of robbery and murder in the first degree, and subsequently sentenced to death. Both his direct appeal and petition for post-conviction relief were denied in state court, but the District Court granted Simmons’s habeas petition oh the ground that the state prosecutors had withheld several

581 F.3d 158 (2009) Ernest SIMMONS v. Jeffrey BEARD, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; William S. Stickman, III, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene; Robert W. Meyers, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution of Rockview, Appellants. No. 05-9001. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued July 13, 2009.

MEMORANDUM ORDER KATHLEEN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge: Pending before this court is the plaintiffs motion to remand this suit to the 30th Judicial District Court, Parish of Vernon, State of Louisiana. Doc. 8. For the following reasons, the Motion to Remand is DENIED. *423 Facts and Procedural History