Cases

NUMBER 13-04-313-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG </

ACCEPTED 12-15-00038-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/29/2015 1:59:00 PM CATHY LUSK

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00182-CR _______________________ DANNY SMITH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-19-00178-CR EX PARTE: § Appeal from the DANNY SALCIDO. §

*862 OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Danny Ray Hall pled guilty to conspiring to manufacture marijuana. See 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a), 846 (West 1981 & Supp. 1992). He appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in concluding that it could not de

Case: 17-15473 Date Filed: 10/11/2019 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15473 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-

44 S.W.3d 508 (2001) Danny Ray HOUSE v. STATE of Tennessee. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. May 16, 2001. *510 John Edward Herbison, Nashville, TN, for the appellant, Danny Ray House. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; Todd R. Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, Sta

JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Appellants, Tony Fish and Ramon Torres, appeal their convictions for second degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 1153 (1982), conspiracy to commit murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1117, 1152 (1982), and kidnaping in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1153 (1982). We affirm.

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Danny Ray Campbell (“Defendant”) pled guilty to the charge of being a felon in possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Although one of the eight rifles recovered from Defendant’s residence was not listed in the indictment for this count, the district court included it as relevant conduct in sentencing and enhanced Defen

252 P.3d 214 (2011) 2011 OK CR 1 Danny R. DAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F-2009-293. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. January 5, 2011. *216 Jerry Colclazier, Lloyd Palmer, Attorneys at Law, Seminole, OK, counsel for defendant at trial. Linda Evans, Assistant Distri

OPINION LUMPKIN, Judge. 1 1 Appellees Julio Juarez Ramos and Isidro Juarez Ramos were charged in the District Court of Woodward County with First Degree Murder (21 0.9$.2001, § 701.7). Case Nos. CF-2009-158 and CR-2009-159, respectively. Separate preliminary hearings were held for each defendant (November 12, 2009, for Julio Ramos and March 12, 2010, for Isidro Ramos), after which each defendant was boun

NUMBER 13-19-00183-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ANISETO ALEJANDRO JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 156th District Court of Liv

620 S.E.2d 19 (2005) John R. SUTTON and James M. Edmonds, Plaintiffs, v. Jarvis Wayne MESSER, Star Stone Enterprises, Inc., Samuel E. Griffin, Reese Lasher, Joe Eblen, Danny Bullman, Charlie Bullman, Sandra Ducket, Lester Wright, Enoc Prather, Charlie Hensley, Steve Metcalf, Bob Posey, Joe Penland, Sr., Gus Colagerakis, and Mike Montaperto, Defendants. No. COA04-757. Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

GRANT, Circuit Judge: *1304 The creditors in this case claim that a husband and wife worked together to commit multiple acts of mail and wire fraud over several years for the purpose of hiding the husband's assets-acts which, in the creditors' telling, violated RICO. The creditors sued th

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Homick and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Depu

DANNY R. ADKINS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 271, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: February 24, 2010. Decided: March 15, 2010. Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices. ORDER RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice. This 15th, day of March 2010, it appears to the Court that: 1) The d

This case involves a pedestrian-truck collision that resulted in the pedestrian's death. The decedent's family contended that the truck driver was negligent in operating the truck and the driver's employer, the truck owner, was negligent in training the driver. The jury found that negligence of the driver, the truck owner-employer, and the decedent proximately caused the collision. The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict. T

Opinion issued November 5, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00027-CV ——————————— JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants 1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Lo

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cl