Cases

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). An alien who is subject to a final order of removal is limited to filing one mot

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). An alien who is subject to a final order of removal is limited to filing one mot

ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e), Docket No. 8; (b) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion for a More Definite Statement, Docket No. 10; (c) Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition for a Motion for a More Definite Statement, Docket No. 14, and (d) Supplemental Opp

715 F.Supp.2d 233 (2010) Samuel LOPEZ QUINONES, et al, Plaintiffs, v. PUERTO RICO NATIONAL GUARD, et al, Defendants. Civil No.: 04-2187 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 26, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration June 3, 2010. *237 Efrain Maceira-Ortiz, Urb. Perez Morris, San Juan, PR, for P

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT VICTOR ORTIZ LOPEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. )

' BENTON, Circuit Judge. Dimas Lopez and 19 other employees represent a class of hourly production employees at a meat-processing facility of Tyson Foods, Inc. The employees sued Tyson for not paying wages due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), *873 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the N

319 F.Supp.2d 236 (2004) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. [1] Carlos AYALA LOPEZ [3] Jose A. Ramos Romero [6] Jose L. Medina Ortiz [9] Rafael Gonzalez Velez Defendants No. CR. 03-55(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 17, 2004. Juan A. Pedrosa-Trapaga, Esq., San Juan, PR, William D. Matthewman, Esq., Boca Raton, FL, Jose C. Romo-Martinez, Es

June 21, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Nos. 91-1290 91-1365 91-1366 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. LUIS E. ORTIZ-ARRIGOITIA, a/k/a COLIBRI, et al Defendants, Appellants ERRATA SHEET The opinion of thi

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered September 9, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that, as a result of a motor vehicle accident, she suffered serious injuries to her spin

734 F.Supp. 573 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Rafael TORMES-ORTIZ. Cr. No. 88-0253 GG. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 19, 1990. *574 Daniel Lopez Romo, U.S. Atty., and Guillermo Gil and Everett M. de Jesus, Trial Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Guaynabo, P.R., for plaintiff. Robert L. Moore, Miami,

23-7183-cr (L) United States v. Lopez In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2024 ARGUED: JANUARY 8, 2025 DECIDED: JULY 2, 2025 Nos. 23-7183-cr (L); 23-7186-cr (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellan

*652 SELYA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Pedro Ortiz-Alarcon (Ortiz) assails his conviction on all three counts of an indictment charging him with violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) (count I), 841(a)(1) (count II), and 955 (count III). 1 Finding

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Miguel Pacheco Ortiz (“Pacheco”) sued Gaspar Sanchez Saez (“Sanchez”) and another unnamed Puerto Rico Police Department officer, in their individual capacities, alleging that they deprived him of constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), engaged in a civil rights conspiracy in violation of 42 U.S.C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-15104 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-00748- v. RCJ 3:12-cr-00004- DANIEL JAMES DRAPER, RCJ-V

OPINION DANIELS, Justice. {1} Defendant’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion filed on August 29, 2013, is withdrawn and the following opinion, which further clarifies the scope of our holding regarding the only issue presented to the Court — whether the constitutional right of confrontation applies at a preliminary ex

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADAN ORTIZ, an individual and on No. 23-55147 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:22-cv-01399- v. TJH-SHK RANDSTAD INHOUSE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability OPINION company; RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corp

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUAN HERNANDEZ-ORTIZ, No. 16-72752 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A076-272-560 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review

PER CURIAM. Francisco J. Pacheco-Ortiz, the appellant, was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and three counts of aiding and abetting mail fraud for his part in an insurance fraud scheme involving arson of warehouses. On appeal, he argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction; that the government failed to disclose exculpato

688 F.Supp.2d 41 (2009) Janette Natal FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Commonwealth of PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-2043 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 22, 2009. *42 Jeannette M. Lopez, Pinto-Lugo, Oliveras & Ortiz, PSC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FLORES, AKA No. 15-73461 Richard Daniel Flores, Petitioner, Agency No. A013-068-941 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Boa