Cases

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18»-18470 Filed: April 15, 2019 ~k*~k~k****~k'k**'ir~k~k*** KAREN TucKER, * _ _ _ * _Plg §§ Plalnt:ff; |n Forma Pauperls; Plaintiff, * Subject-Matter Jurtsdiction; Fai|ure * to State a Clairn; Nlotion to Dismiss; V‘ * Fourth Amendment; Sixth UN|TED STATES, * Amendment; Civi| Rights; Torts; * Breach of Contract. Defendant. * *'k**~k****‘k'k*'k*‘k'k** Karen Tucker, grow §_e_, |Vlar|ton, New Jersey. A|bert S. larossi, Trial Attorney, Commercial

728 F.Supp.2d 114 (2010) Teri TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.; National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., A Subsidiary of American International Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:09-CV-1499 (CSH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 4, 2010. *115 Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Lucas Bagn

144 B.R. 475 (1992) In re BALDWIN PARK INN ASSOCIATES, a California General Partnership, Alleged Debtor. BALDWIN PARK INN ASSOCIATES, a California General Partnership, Outlook Baldwin Park Partners, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership by and through its general partner Outlook Baldwin Park Corporation, a California corporation, SWG Baldwin Park Inn Associates, Ltd., a California Limited Partnership by and through its general partner SWG Management Comp

Judgment rendered May 26, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,940-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ASHLEY ROBINSON, IN HER

MEMORANDUM WISEMAN, Chief Judge. The defendant has filed a motion asking this Court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction by dismissing or, in the alternative, staying this action on the grounds of Colorado River Water Conservation District v. U.S., 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). The issue before the Court is whether or not to decline to exercise federal jurisdiction over plain

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, individuals and corporations, participate as limited partners in two limited partnerships: defendant Adson Realty Associates (Associates) and defendant Ad-son Partners (Adson). Defendant Richard Schlesinger is the sole general partner of Adson. Believing the general partner was too enterprising a steward, plaintiffs obtained a preliminary injunction on January 27, 1989 in the United St

888 F.2d 969 TUCKER ANTHONY REALTY CORPORATION, Charles F. Hovey, Jr.,Laura J. Vennard, Stephen Palmer, R. Park Palmer, John C.Dusel, George Crawford and Tucker Anthony & R.L. Day,Incorporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Richard SCHLESINGER, Adson Partners, a limited partnership,and Adson Realty Associates, a limitedpartnership, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 1138, 89-7181.

513 F.Supp. 355 (1980) James McCARTHER, Plaintiff, v. CAMELOT INN OF LITTLE ROCK, Defendant. No. LR-76-C-195. United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D. May 5, 1981. Prather Randle, John W. Walker, John W. Walker, P.A., Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff and intervenor. James W. Moore, Tucker Raney Mathis, Friday, Eldredge & Clark, Little Rock, Ark

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This case concerns affidavits filed under Section 8 of the Lanham Act, and the consequences of failure of the trademark owner to show that the registered mark is in use “in commerce”. The principal issue is *1403 whether use in commerce must be explicitly averred in

OWENS, District Judge: Plaintiff, Mrs. Cherry S. Tucker, a Florida citizen, filed her complaint against the City of Macon, former Macon police officer Charles Carey Stokes and former Macon Mayor Ronnie Thompson alleging that she is entitled to money damages for the wrongful death of her deceased husband John V. Tucker caused by his being assaulted, struck and beaten in the city jail by officer Stokes while under arrest for bei

241 Pa. Superior Ct. 150 (1976) 360 A.2d 209 INN LE'DAERDA, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Benjamin I. DAVIS et al. INN LE'DAERDA, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Wilbert F. MARSHALL and Thelma M. Marshall, his wife. Clyde Edward SEIGLER, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Robert H. PHILLIPS et al. Superior Court of Pennsylvania

SHEPARD, Justice. This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff-respondent Tucker in a negligence action. Tucker suffered an industrial accident while in the employ of Feed Services [a non-party to this action], received workmen’s compensation benefits therefor, and thereafter brought this action against eight defendants as third-party tortfeasors. The verdict and judgment were entered only against Collier Carbon a

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Data Disc brought a diversity action in the Northern District of California against Systems Technology Associates (STA), alleging that STA breached certain sales contracts by failing to pay the entire purchase price due. Data Disc also alleged that STA fraudulently induced it to resume delivery of goods which had previously been stopped for non-payment

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a breach of contract case in which plaintiff National Feeds, Inc. (NFI), alleges defendant United Pet Foods, Inc. (UPF), produced and sold rancid mink and dog feed to the plaintiff, who then distributed the feed to its customers. Defendant has moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. (Doc, 101). For t

[Cite as In re R.G.H., 2020-Ohio-4403.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: R.G.H., N.H., and M.Y.G.H. : : : Appellate Case No. 28628 : : Trial Co

MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Oxford Investments, L.P.’s Motion for *446Summary Judgment (Doc. 71), the City of Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 70), and all responses thereto. For the reasons more fully set forth below, the Court w

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 29, 2014) CABRET, Associate Justice. Cacciamani and Rover Architects (“CRA”) appeals the Superior Court’s dismissal of its unjust enrichment claim against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and BP Sirenusa International, LLC, for allegedly using CRA’s architectural plans without paying for them. 'Because the Superior Court erred in holding that the barred by

GRIFFIS, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Arvind Kumar, individually and d/b/a Holiday Inn of Columbus, Tony Savage, and Tracey Savage (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the Lowndes County Circuit Court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment. They claim that because they clearly expressed their intent to defend against the claims made by Shanna Loper, they were entitled to notice of the default hea

MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. This is a civil RICO action. Plaintiff Karen Sarpolis initiated this action against nine defendants1 for conspiracy to “devalue” and “derail” Plaintiffs settlement in a medical malpractice action in state court. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint asserts four, causes of action for conspiracy in violation of Pennsylvania state

Choe-Groves, Judge: This case highlights the procedural and jurisdictional hurdles that a party must overcome when it seeks to prevent the Government from stopping the import of its products into the United States. In this case, One World Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "One World") seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from the Court to allow future imports of its merchandise into the United States. Plaintiff faces a frustra