⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “D-J Engineering, Inc. v. 818 Aviation, Inc.”

District Court, D. Wyoming · 2007-05-11 · Published · cited 1× · 505 F. Supp. 2d 1252; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35028; 2007 WL 1417148
505 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2007) UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., a New York corporation, Manager, United States Aircraft Insurance Group; Compass Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Jet Aviation, Inc., a Maryland corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DASSAULT AVIATION, a French entity; Societe d'Etudes at de Construction de Monteurs d'Aviation a/k/a Snecma d/b/a Messier-Bugatti, a French entity; Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, a Delaware corporation;
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2020-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–1199 Filed January 10, 2020 ROY KARON and PEDDLER LLC, Appellants, vs. ELLIOTT AVIATION, JAMES MITCHELL, WYNN ELLIOTT, ELLIOTT AVIATION AIRCRAFT SALES, INC., and ELLIOTT JETS, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David N. May, Judge. The plaintiffs appeal a district court order dismissing their claims without prejudice based on
Alaska Supreme Court · 2001-02-27 · Published · cited 1× · 17 P.3d 40
17 P.3d 40 (2000) ERA AVIATION, INC., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Sherri Lee LINDFORS, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Nos. S-9062, S-9072. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 24, 2000. Rehearing Granted February 27, 2001. *42 Thomas M. Daniel, Helena L. Hall and Marja E. Selmann, Perkins Coie, LLP, Anchorage, f
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009-08-17 · Published · cited 1× · 650 F. Supp. 2d 594; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72234; 2009 WL 2524610
650 F.Supp.2d 594 (2009) AEROTECH HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANCE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 4:09-CV-252-A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. August 17, 2009. *597 Patrick W. Powers, Peyton J. Healey, Cash Powers Taylor LLP, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs. G
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 1989-08-31 · Published · cited 13× · 776 S.W.2d 734; 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2296; 1989 WL 99882
776 S.W.2d 734 (1989) SOUTHWIND AVIATION, INC. and Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Appellants, v. Victor AVENDANO, Appellee. No. 13-88-292-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. August 31, 1989. Rehearing Denied October 5, 1989. *735 John Williamson, Brownsville, for appellants. Ricardo Morado, Wiech &
California Court of Appeal · 2010-08-23 · Published · cited 9× · 187 Cal. App. 4th 945; 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 644; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1463
187 Cal.App.4th 945 (2010) 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 644 TED JACOB ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE RATCLIFF ARCHITECTS, Defendant and Appellant. No. A122932. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. August 23, 2010. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*]
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2015-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 06-15-00061-cv SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/26/2015 9:54:40 PM
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996-07-08 · Published · cited 3× · 197 W. Va. 347; 475 S.E.2d 439; 1996 W. Va. LEXIS 86
McHUGH, Chief Justice: This is an appeal from the judgment order of November 21, 1994 and from the subsequent order of February 24, 1995, denying defendant Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation’s (hereinafter “Kaiser”) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial.1 Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, Kaiser was ordered to p
United States Court of Claims · 1985-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 8 Cl. Ct. 1; 32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,403; 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1005
OPINION LYDON, Judge: This case centers on the propriety of the cancellation of a solicitation by the United States Air Force and its subsequent failure to resolicit. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s request for equitable relief based on the court’s lack of equitable jurisdiction over the matter. On February 8, 1985, plaintiff filed a complaint in this court requesting a temporary restraining order
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991-08-20 · Published · cited 6× · 595 A.2d 1264; 407 Pa. Super. 511; 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2505
407 Pa. Superior Ct. 511 (1991) 595 A.2d 1264 C.J. BETTERS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. MID SOUTH AVIATION SERVICES, INC., d/b/a/ Lakeland Air Center and R.E. Shackelford, Appellees. (Two Cases) Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 9, 1991. Filed August 20, 1991. *512 Joseph T. Moran, Pittsburgh, f
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003-05-21 · Published · cited 23× · 262 F. Supp. 2d 1004; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9320; 2003 WL 21205261
*1006ORDER DOTY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon plaintiff Florida State Board of Administration’s (“FSBA”) motion for partial summary judgment on defendant Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.’s (“Law”) affirmative defenses of (1) improper venue, (2) statute of limitations, (3) economic loss doctrine, (4) no fiduc
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001-02-15 · Published · cited 110× · 45 S.W.3d 658; 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 1038; 2001 WL 125926
45 S.W.3d 658 (2001) Traci MICHEL, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Don Michel, Jr., and as Next Friend of Sydney Michel, Don Michel, Sr., and Ada Michel, Appellants. v. ROCKET ENGINEERING CORP., and STC/Mooney Limited, Appellees. No. 2-00-112-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 15, 2001. *665 B
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987-10-26 · Published · cited 9× · 672 F. Supp. 659; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10115
672 F.Supp. 659 (1987) WHELEN ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. v. TOMAR ELECTRONICS, INC. Civ. No. H-87-470 (AHN). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 26, 1987. *660 Thomas G. Watkins, III, Cahill, Sutton & Thomas, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff. Guy D. Yale, Chilton, Alix & Van Kirk, Hartford, Conn., for
California Supreme Court · 1998-08-31 · Published · cited 296× · 960 P.2d 1046; 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16; 19 Cal. 4th 66; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6792; 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449; 98 Daily Journal DAR 9379; 1998 Cal. LEXIS 5590
*71Opinion CHIN, J. May administrative regulations be a source of fundamental public policy that limits an employer’s right to discharge an otherwise at-will employee? Although our Legislature has determined that an emplovment contract is generally terminable at either-party’s will (Lab. Code, § 2922),1 we have created a narrow
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2023-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Betance Enterprises, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 63076, 63077, 63078 ) 63079 ) Under Contract No. W9128F-16-D-0003 ) Task Order No. W9128F-18-F-0032 ) Task Order No. W9128F-18-F-0034 ) Task
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987-03-03 · Published · cited 78× · 813 F.2d 543; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3152
813 F.2d 543 Susan Winter WOODLING, as Executrix of the Estate of AlbertD. Woodling, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.The GARRETT CORPORATION, Colt Electronics Company, PhoenixAerospace, Inc., Lockheed Corporation andTexasgulf Aviation, Inc., Defendants.The GARRETT CORPORATION, Colt Electronics Company, PhoenixAerospace, Inc., and Lockheed Corporation, ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellees,The Garrett Co
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00040-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 57× · 603 U.S. 799
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 799–865 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT July 1, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-07-31 · Published · cited 97× · 934 F.3d 53
Droney, Circuit Judge: The principal question presented in this appeal is whether 47 U.S.C. § 230 (c)(1), a provision enacted by the Communications Decency Act of 1996, shields Defendant-Appellee Facebook, Inc., from civil liability as to Plaintiffs-Appellants' federal anti-terrorism claim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-01-12 · Published · cited 120× · 22 F.4th 852
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LNS ENTERPRISES LLC, a limited No. 20-16897 liability company; SONOMA ORAL AND FACIAL SURGERY PLLC, a D.C. No. professional limited liability 2:19-cv-05221- company; PETER SPANGANBERG; SMB LYNN SPANGANBERG, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., a