Cases

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-1557 _____________________________ CLAYTON AUSTIN, Appellant, v. CYNTHIA M. AUSTIN n/k/a CYNTHIA M. WARDLAW, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge. March 1, 2018 PER CURIAM.

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2005 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2005. In The Fourteenth Court

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: The California legislature enacted California Family Code Section 7962 (“Section 7962”) to codify California cases that found gestational surrogacy contracts enforceable. 1 Among other matters, Section, 7962

971 A.2d 331 (2009) 185 Md. App. 440 Zarzine WARDLAW v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1478 September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 8, 2009. *333 Thomas M. Donnelly (R. Troy Mowery, Donnelly & Mowery LLC on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Edward G. Wells (Douglas F. Gansler

This is an appeal by the defendant from an adverse judgment on a note in favor of Exchange Savings and Loan Association. Exchange sued the defendant, as community survivor, to recover the balance due on a note in favor of Exchange, which note had been executed by the defendant's deceased husband. This note was secured by a mobile home, which was sold for $7,000 during pendency of this suit and the proceeds placed in the court's registry. After crediting an amount paid Exchange on a cr

832 So.2d 258 (2002) Brian Lester WARDLAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D01-169. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 11, 2002. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann Pfeiffer Howe, Assist

Affirmed.

OPINION LIPEZ, Circuit Judge: This case, brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), stems from the sudden death of Jack Williams as a result of Deep Vein Thrombosis (“DVT”) shortly after he completed roughly 28 hours of air travel in a five-day period. Appellee National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsy

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUCAS GONCALVES, a minor, by and No. 15-55010 through his Guardian Ad Litem, Tony Goncalves, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:14-cv-01774- GPC-BGS v. RADY CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL SAN OPINION DIEGO; DOES, 1 through 30, Inclusive, Defendants,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL No. 14-16977 DIVERSITY; PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, D.C. No. non-profit organizations, 3:11-cv-00293-JCS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee, CROPLIFE AMERICA; RESPONSIBLE INDUSTRY FOR A SOUND ENVIRONME

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This appeal is the latest in a decade-long conflict over the cost of copayments and medication for low-income Arizonans who qualify for a state Medicaid demonstration project covering childless adults. The sole *971 issue is whether the member

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT C. W., a minor, by her Mother, K.S., No. 12-57315 Guardian Ad Litem; K.S., Guardian Ad Litem, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:11-cv-01157- DOC-RNB v. CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL OPINION DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United St

MEMORANDUM ** Robert Lum (“Lum”) pled guilty to conspiring to distribute more than fifty grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1) and 846. Lum now appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw the guilty plea prior to sentencing. Lum alleges he demonstrated a “fair and just reason” for withdrawal because his counsel misinformed him about the government’s willingness

607 F.3d 1178 (2010) COMITE DE JORNALEROS DE REDONDO BEACH; National Day Laborer Organizing Network, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, Defendant-Appellant. Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach; National Day Laborer Organizing Network, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. City of Redondo Beach, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 06-55750, 06-56869. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

MEMORANDUM ** Lenin Paul Salazar-Montoya appeals from his 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and *677(b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. To the extent Salazar-Montoya conten

458 F.3d 1034 Arangesan SUNTHARALINKAM, Petitioner,v.Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 04-70258. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 2006. Filed August 18, 2006. Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Law Office of Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT RADCLIFFE; CHESTER No. 11-56376 CARTER ; MARIA FALCON ; CLIFTON C. SEALE, III; ARNOLD LOVELL, JR., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:05-cv-01070- DOC-MLG CHRISTY DRIVER ; IVONNE MARTINEZ; KELLY J. PORTER ; LISA BRISBANE; BRENDA MELENDEZ; RALPH MICHAEL PORTER , Objectors-Appellants,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT RADCLIFFE; CHESTER No. 11-56376 CARTER ; MARIA FALCON ; CLIFTON C. SEALE, III; ARNOLD LOVELL, JR., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:05-cv-01070- DOC-MLG CHRISTY DRIVER ; IVONNE MARTINEZ; KELLY J. PORTER ; LISA BRISBANE; BRENDA MELENDEZ; RALPH MICHAEL PORTER , Objectors-Appellants,

516 F.3d 1095 (2008) In re SYNCOR ERISA LITIGATION, Carol Pilkington; Donna Brown; Karen Thompson; Cynthia Dunn; Antoinette Hart; Shirley Nobrega; Deborah Pinner; Pamela Thomson; Cherie Brannan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Cardinal Health, Inc.; Robert D. Walter; Paul S. William, Defendants, and Syncor International Corporation; Robert G. Funari; Monty Fu, Defendants-Appellees.

GRABER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Plaintiff missed numerous filing deadlines, failed outright to file certain documents, repeatedly failed to request leave of the court to file documents late, and filed documents in improper form. In contrast to many cases, the district court here issued a- detailed ten-page written order describing the procedural history of the case and weighing the five