Cases

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge. Billy Shiplet (“Billy”) sued Larry Copeland (“Larry”) and Judith Copeland (“Judith”) 1 (collectively the “Copelands”), d/b/a C & C Car Sales, and Bob Lees (“Lees”), d/b/a Auto Body Plus, alleging violations of the Missouri Merchandizing Practices Act (“MMPA”)

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, David Harrison Biro ("Mr. Biro"), in Case No. 2006-L-068, appeals from a judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, in which the trial court granted appellee, Linda Biro (now known as "Ms. Tsuda") a divorce, divided the parties' property and debts, and awarded spousal support. In Case No. 2006-L-236, appellant appeals from a judgment of the Lak

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge. 1 iThis workers’ compensation appeal is brought by Cynthia Grady and Jeremy Grady, widow and son of Dennis J. Grady Jr., who sustained a fatal-crush injury while driving a tractor with a bush hog and mowing lots adjacent to the Bunker Hill Golf Course. Appellees are the estate of Carlie Smith, who owned and leased the lands involved,1 and brothers No

550 F.3d 1179 (2008) AMERICAN FOREST AND PAPER ASSOCIATION, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent Cogeneration Association of California, et al., Intervenors. No. 07-1328. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 13, 2008. Decided December 23, 2008. *1180

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE VOICE OF SURPRISE, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SKIP HALL, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 22-0696 FILED 4-27-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2022-01336

OPINION Willie J. Jackson appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Illinois Farmers Insurance Company ("Farmers") following Farmers' denial of coverage to Jackson. Jackson, who was injured by an uninsured motorist while operating a government-owned vehicle in the course of his employment, raises one issue which we restate as: whether the exclusions in the uninsured and underinsured portions of his personal automobile coverage which prohibit reco

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: While I join in the majority’s conclusion on standing as outlined in Part A of the Analysis section, I respectfully, but strongly, dissent from the other parts of the majority opinion. The truth is that the Department of the Interior’s (Interior) re-categorization of the late June 2004 releases from the Nimbus a

PICKETT, Judge. J¡FACTS On March 22, 2011, the defendant was stopped by a police officer who had just received a radio dispatch concerning a possible burglary. The officer was suspicious of the defendant because the defendant was walking in the middle of the roadway, was wearing a hoodie, and was walking froin the direction of the possible burglary. When the officer attempted to pat down the defe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2023 Term FILED _______________ November 7, 2023 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 22-0197 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 747 (BIA 2009) Interim Decision #3634 Matter of Jose AGUILAR-AQUINO, Respondent File A095 748 786 - Los Angeles, California Decided March 12, 2009 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) “Custody,” as the term is used in the regulation at 8 C.

Karen King Mitchell, Judge Aroostook Mette-Njuldnir appeals his conviction of second-degree assault, entered following a jury trial, for which .he was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Mette-Njuldnir raises two points on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing to determine whether Mette-Njuldnir was competent to be tried and sentenced; and (2) the tr

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are twenty-four current or former police officers employed by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (“VA”) at the VA Medical Center in Washington, D.C. 1 who object to the secret installation of audio and video surveillance devices at their place of employment. Cla

337 S.W.3d 124 (2011) Anthony HOGAN, Respondent, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, et al., Appellant, Police Retirement System of Kansas City, Appellant. Nos. WD 71687, WD 71705. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 8, 2011. *127 Rik N. Siro, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent. Lisa

In re Robert G. Kay Irrevocable Supplemental Needs Trust, No. 808-9-18 Cncv (Toor, J., June 6, 2019). In re Benjamin R. Kay Irrevocable Supplemental Needs Trust, No. 809-9-18 Cncv (Toor, J., June 6, 2019). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] VERMONT SUP

624 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2009) SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY and Westlands Water District, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, et al., Defendants. Save San Francisco Bay Assoc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. Nos. 1:97-CV-6140 OWW DLB, 1:98-CV-5261 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California.

E-B Grain Co., et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentE-B Grain Co. v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 4291-82, 4292-82, 4293-82United States Tax Court

751 F.Supp. 899 (1990) Valerie CUNNINGHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE; Gary A. Zimmerman; Secretary of State Ralph Munro; and Attorney General Ken Eikenberry, Defendants. No. C89-1587WD. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 28, 1990. Thomas W. Burt, Daniel S. Gottlieb, Hugh R. Tobin, Walter Walkinshaw,

OPINION Fay, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $4,959.60 in petitioner’s Federal income tax for 1975. The issue is whether petitioner must include in her gross income under section 71(a)(1)1 certain benefits received from her former husband. All the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.

159 Ariz. 72 (1988) 764 P.2d 1131 SCOTTSDALE PUBLISHING, INC., an Arizona corporation, Jonathan and Maxine Marshall, and Don Devereux and Niomi Devereux, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Honorable Marilyn A. Riddel, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, Roy ROMANO, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 178. Court of Appeals of

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi