Cases

421 N.W.2d 785 (1988) 228 Neb. 191 Ronald Dean RODGERS, Appellee, v. Roger SPARKS, Doing Business as Sparks Concrete, and the Hartford Insurance Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellants; Cornhusker Casualty Company, Third-Party Defendant, Appellee. No. 87-599. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 8, 1988. *786<

531 S.W.2d 454 (1975) Fred F. BOYSEN, Sr., dba Bissonnet Roofing Co., Appellant, v. SECURITY LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Appellee. No. 1252. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 24, 1975. Rehearing Denied January 14, 1976. *455 Anthony L. Vetrano, Jr., Houston, for appellant. William F

771 F.Supp.2d 713 (2011) Erin C. SANBORN-ALDER, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Clifford Alder, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, Life Insurance Company of North America, CBCA Administrators, Inc., and National Employment Benefit Companies, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-09-0806. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. Feb

449 F.Supp. 55 (1978) Joan WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-1824-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 20, 1978. *56 Caroline Playter, Doyle, Playter, Novick & Reitmayer, Dorchester, Mass., Karen S. Slaney, Barmack, Heller, Kaufman & Slaney, Cambr

780 A.2d 1075 (2001) Lu V. MALPIEDE, Neil Malpiede, Julie S. Karchin, JJL Partners, Mary Jane Howard, and Roger H. Papazian, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. George W. TOWNSON, Richard O. Starbird, Hugh W. Hunter, William J. Barrett, Merle A. Johnston, Royalty Acquisition Corp., Royalty Corporation, and Knightsbridge Capital Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 80, 2000. Supreme Court of Delaw

OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacA

649 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2009) Lawrence LANE, On Behalf of Himself, and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Barbara PAGE, Sosimo Padilla, Joe Chavez, Josie Castillo, Charles Pena, Georgia Baca, Troy Benavidez, Ray Mares, Jr., Randolph Sanchez, Westland Development Co., Inc., SunCal Companies Group, the D.E. Shaw Group, D.E. Shaw & Co. L.P., D.E. Shaw Real Estate Portfolios 1, L.L.C., D.E. Shaw & Co., Inc., D.E. Shaw Investment Group,

EFiled: Mar 09 2023 08:00AM EST Transaction ID 69300274 Case No. 2022-0406-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES 14, ) L.P., NEA VENTURES 2014, L.P., ) NEA:SEED II, LLC, and CORE ) CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., )

552 F.Supp. 340 (1982) C & S FUEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79-40. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, London Division. November 24, 1982. *341 *342 John M. Choplin, II, Peter A. Schroeder, Norris, Choplin & Johnson, Indianapolis, Ind

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 12, 2014, CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC (“CarMax”) filed a petition for an order compelling arbitration under § 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 4; it also sought a stay of state court proceedings arising out of its d

OPINION BERGER, Vice-Chancellor. This case involves an attack upon the validity of an employee stock ownership plan adopted by Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”) 0on July 12, 1988. Unlike most litigation precipitated by an attempted takeover, this case proceeded to trial while the tender offer was outstanding and the Court is rendering its final decision on the merits. Plaintiffs, Shamrock

*726Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO, in which Chief Judge PROST and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL join. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judge HUGHES joins. TARANTO, Circuit. Judge. Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise provided in [the Patent A

The opinion of the court was delivered by Jacobs, J. The Appellate Division, in an opinion by Judge Conford, set forth the pertinent facts and legal principles and properly held that the evidence was sufficient to call for retrial and jury determination on the primary issues of negligent misfeasance (active wrongdoing) and con-*532tributary negligence.

23 N.J. 530 (1957) 129 A.2d 876 EVA F. HARTMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM AND EVA F. HARTMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY HARTMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BRIGANTINE AND COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 11, 1957. Decided March 11, 1957.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

53 N.J. 463 (1969) 251 A.2d 278 DONALD ETTIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AVA TRUCK LEASING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT. DONALD ETTIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SWEETS CO. OF AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey.. Argued January 20, 1969. Argued January 21, 1969.

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

284 F.Supp.2d 511 (2003) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION, Pamela M. Tittle, Thomas O. Padgett, Gary S. Dreadin, Janice Farmer, Linda Bryan, John L. Moore, Betty J. Clark, Shelly Farias, Patrick Campbell, Fanette Perry, Charles Prestwood, Roy Rinard, Steve Lacey, Catherine Stevens, Roger W. Boyce, Wayne M. Stevens, Norman L. and Paula H. Young, Michael L. McCown, and Dan Schultz, on behalf of themselves and a cl

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

George Starke, J. In this nonjury case, a retailer is being sued by the plaintiff individually and as guardian ad litem of her two infant daughters, for both negligence and breach of warranty. All three claim personal injuries as a result of eating jam which allegedly contained foreign deleterious substance. The plaintiff mother purchased the jam (a sealed jar) from the defendant. In the absen