Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Curry v. State of CA”
State v. Currypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Curry, 2025-Ohio-2702.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. Kevin W. Popham, J. : Hon.
State v. Currypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Curry, 2014-Ohio-3836.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2012-CA-50 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 12-CR-156 v.
Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. (2022 NY Slip Op 00761) Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. 2022 NY Slip Op 00761 Decided on February 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. (2022 NY Slip Op 00760) Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. 2022 NY Slip Op 00760 Decided on February 4, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. (2022 NY Slip Op 02748) Matter of Curry-Malcolm v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. 2022 NY Slip Op 02748 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Johnson v. Currypublic domain
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (E. Jeannette Ogden, J.), entered November 15, 2016. The order and judgment granted the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Lord v. Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc.public domain
Lord v Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 03241) Lord v Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 03241 Decided on June 14, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Repor
State v. Currypublic domain
147 P.3d 483 (2006) 2006 UT App 390 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ronnie M. CURRY, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20050465-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. October 5, 2006. *484 Marea A. Doherty, Duchesne, for Appellant. Clark B. Allred and Clark A. McClellan, Allred & McClellan, Vernal,
Curry v. Statepublic domain
John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge. The appellant was charged with filing a false police report in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-54-122 (Repl. 1997). After a jury trial, he was found guilty of committing that offense, sentenced to 180 days in jail, and fined $7,000. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the grounds that there was no evidence tha
Rush v. Currypublic domain
745 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2010) Robert Dalton RUSH, Petitioner, v. Ben CURRY, Respondent. No. C 09-2266 CRB (PR). United States District Court, N.D. California. September 27, 2010. Robert Dalton Rush, Soledad, CA, pro se. Amanda Jane Murray, California Department of Justice State Attorney General's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Opalec v. Currypublic domain
(2008) Roderick OPALEC, Petitioner, v. Ben CURRY, Warden, Respondent. No. C 06-6459 MHP (pr). United States District Court, N.D. California. March 20, 2008. ORDER GRANTING HABEAS PETITION MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Roderick Opalec, a prisoner at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, filed this <
Lord v. Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc.public domain
Lord v Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 07563) Lord v Whelan & Curry Constr. Servs., Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 07563 Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by
Curry v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. Before the Court is a motion to certify this matter as a class action. The plaintiffs are current and former employees of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs’ Veterans Health Administration (“VHA”). These employees, and the members of the class that they seek to certify, serve or served in health care positions for the VHA, received addit
State v. Currypublic domain
187 Ariz. 623 (1996) 931 P.2d 1133 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Joe Christol CURRY, Appellant. Nos. 1 CA-CR 94-0617, 1 CA-CR 95-0056. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. September 10, 1996. Review and Cross-Petition for Review Denied February 26, 1997. *625 Grant Woods
BISHOP, DAVID A. v. CURRY, ASHELY R.public domain
*1432 Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered June 24, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment, or in the alternative, for sanctions on the ground of spoliation of evidence. It is hereby ordered that the order
District of Columbia v. Currypublic domain
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Curry v. Castillopublic domain
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether a standing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Trustee enjoys absolute quasi-judicial immunity for scheduling and noticing a bankruptcy confirmation hearing. We agree with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) that the Trustee and her assistant enjoy absolute quasi-judicial immunity from liability for the decision to schedule the bankruptcy confirmation hearing. Because we further conclude t
State v. Currypublic domain
814 P.2d 1150 (1991) STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Robert M. CURRY, Defendant and Appellant. No. 900579-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. July 10, 1991. J. Franklin Allred, P.C., Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant. R. Paul Van Dam, State Atty. Gen. and Sandra L. Sjogren, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee. Bef
State ex rel. Curry v. Morrowpublic domain
PER CURIAM In this appeal from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus, appellant alleges that defendants denied appellant credit for time served in a county jail facility to which he was entitled pursuant to ORS 137.320 and ORS 137.370(2)(a). ORS 34.105 et seq. Defendants respond that there is a more recent statement of confinement from the county in the record than that
State Ex Rel. Curry v. Thompsonpublic domain
967 P.2d 522 (1998) 156 Or. App. 537 STATE ex rel. Anthony L. CURRY, Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Tamara Blair, Records Officer, Oregon State Penitentiary, Larry Daniel, Records Manager, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondents. 97C-12411; CA A100629. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Record and Briefs