Cases

Ruffin, Judge. This appeal stems from a tragic automobile collision caused by Vicky Jenkins while she was driving under the influence of alcohol. As the victim was waiting at a railroad crossing for a train to pass, Jenkins drove her pickup truck into the rear of the victim’s car and rammed it into the train. The victim’s injuries left her paralyzed from the chest down. Following trial, a jury found Jenkins guilty of one count o

535 S.E.2d 521 (2000) 244 Ga. App. 541 JENKINS v. SMITH et al. No. A00A0470. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 7, 2000. Reconsideration Denied June 22, 2000. *522 Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, Leigh M. Wilco, Joan C. Green, Atlanta, for appellant. King & Croft, F. Carlton

[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2025-Ohio-4447.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240565 TRIAL NO. B-2402300 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : DESHAWN JENKINS, :

Judge Harold R. Banke. Anthony Jenkins was convicted of robbery by force. He enumerates three errors on appeal. This case arose in the early morning when Jenkins ran into his 88-year-old great-grandmother’s bedroom screaming, “Mama, I’m on drugs and I need some money.” Then he beat her, stole her purse, and fled. Later, a visiting nurse discovered the victim, and emergency medical technicians (“EMTs”) were c

OPINION This is a suit by a judgment creditor to collect a default judgment under an automobile liability policy. It is undisputed *Page 893 that the additional insured against whom the default judgment was rendered failed to notify the insurer of the lawsuit filed against him. It is further undisputed that the insurer had actual knowledge of the suit. The question is whether the insurer is liable for the default

The Opinion or the Court. — At the July term of the Fayette county court, an order was made, on the motion of Hamilton Jenkins, directing Curry, orphan of Nicholas Curry, deceased, to be bound as an apprentice to him to learn the mill-wright’s trade. On the same day, John Curry, by James Tracy, his next friend, moved the court to rescind the order; but the court being divided in opinion, the motion fell. A bill of exceptions was taken to the opinion of th

WILLIAMS, J. Shaniqua D. Jenkins (Wife) appeals the family court’s division of Gregory H. Jenkins’ (Husband) military retirement benefits, arguing the date of valuation for the retirement benefits and the percentage awarded to Wife was incorrect. In addition, Wife asserts the family court’s reliance on Wolfe v. Wolfe, 220 S.C. 437, 68 S.E.2d 348 (1951), was a violation of her equal protection rights because that decis

Appeal No. 383970 from Judgment dated Aug. 19, 1991, R.I. Prichard III, Ruling Judge, Forrest County Circuit Court. Before HAWKINS, C.J., and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and SMITH, JJ. Affirmed. McRAE, J., not participating.

CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Susan Kristine Gregory Jenkins (Kris) appeals the judgment of the Jones County Chancery Court, which granted her an irreconcilable-differences divorce from her husband, Robert Wayne Jenkins Jr. (Bobby). Aggrieved with the chancellor’s property division, Kris appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion by the chancellor, we affirm. FACTS ¶2. Bobb

Opinion issued July 6, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00942-CR ——————————— DOMINIQUE CURRY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

OPINION Richardson, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which Keller, P.J., Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, and Yeary, JJ., joined. In June 2013, a jury convicted appellant of capital murder for committing the offense of murder in the course of aggravat*589ed rape in November 1975.

PD-0832-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 11/2/2015 1:05:05 PM November 2, 2015 Accepted 11/2/2015 2:26:45 PM

PD-0832-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/17/2015 12:39:45 PM December 17, 2015 Accepted 12/17/2015 12:49:56 PM

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: This action was brought on behalf of two elementary school students who allegedly were strip searched by a teacher and guidance counselor after having been accused of stealing money from a classmate. The district court concluded that defendants were entitled to summary judgment on all claims. In particular, the court granted the individual defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs’ § 1983 Fourth Am

580 F.3d 1071 (2009) Anthony Bernard SMITH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee, v. B. CURRY; Bill Lockyer, Respondents-Appellants. Anthony Bernard Smith, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. B. Curry; Bill Lockyer, Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 07-16875, 07-16876. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 10, 2008. Filed September 8,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH, Jr.,  Petitioner-Appellee, No. 07-16875 v.  D.C. No. CV-03-01871- B. CURRY; BILL LOCKYER, LKK/KJM Respondents-Appellants.  ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH, Jr.,  No. 07-16876 Petiti

The appellant secured from the circuit court an alternative writ of mandamus requiring the City of Miami, its manager, and its Director of Public Safety to reinstate him to his former position on the police force or to show cause why a peremptory writ should not issue. A motion to quash was presented, and the order granting it is challenged in this appeal. The history of the procedure which culminated in the dismissal of appellant from the police force by the Director of Public Safety

When a majority of this Court does something that is totally inconsistent with a prior decision or decisions of this Court, our presiding judge exclaims "Color Me Amazed". See for example Aldrighetti v. State, 507 S.W.2d 770, 775 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974); and Antunez v. State, 647 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983). In light of what this Court did in Gauldin v. State,683 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.

PERRY, District Judge. Stephanie Jenkins brought this sexual harassment suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the University of Minnesota, David Andersen, and Ted Swem. After the district court denied Swem’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, he appealed. This Court has jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal. We affirm the district court’s

PER CURIAM. Franklyn Jenkins appeals from a judgment of the Houston Circuit Court (“the trial court”) granting a summary-judgment motion filed by American Transport, Inc. (“ATI”), in Jenkins’s action seeking benefits under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. We reverse and remand. *999In April 2011,