⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Curry v. Flaherty”

Curry v. Currypublic domain
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 14× · 987 A.2d 233; 2010 R.I. LEXIS 15; 2010 WL 290461
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 235 OPINION The marriage of Andrew and Dorothy Curry, which began in 1968, has been in the throes of dissolution since 1996. Finally, in 2005, a justice of the Family Court granted the parties' divorce petitions and divided their marital assets in accordance with Rhode Island's
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 497 Pa. 345; 440 A.2d 1190; 1982 Pa. LEXIS 389
ORDER PER CURIAM: Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Curry v. Romanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 217 A.D.2d 321
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same opinion by Doerr, J., as in Curry v Roman ([appeal No. 1] 217 AD2d 314 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Vacate Default.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 283 A.D.2d 937; 723 N.Y.S.2d 784; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4574
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant to the extent that it sought summary judg*938ment declaring that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Leo Heaps in plaintiffs’ underlying actions against Heaps and Herbert Roman, individually and d/
Curry v. Romanpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 217 A.D.2d 321
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same opinion by Doerr, J., as in Curry v Roman ([appeal No. 1] 217 AD2d 314 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Vacate Condition.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 192 A.2d 31; 159 Me. 305
192 A.2d 31 (1963) George A. CURRY v. PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. June 25, 1963. Berman, Berman, Wernick & Flaherty, by John J. Flaherty, Portland, for plaintiff. Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen & McKusick by Fred C. Scribner, Jr. and Ralph I. Lancaster Jr., Portland, for defendant. Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, S
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County · 1991-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 11 Pa. D. & C.4th 521; 1991 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 238
LAVELLE, P.J., This is a declaratory judgment action seeking a judicial interpretation of certain exclusions in a building contractor’s general liability insurance policy. The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, John J. Curry and Son, a general contractor, built an addition onto the Lake Harmony, Carbon County home of defendants, Edwin and Deanna Kresge, his wife, pursuant to a contract sign
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985-06-14 · Published · cited 3× · 494 A.2d 1146; 343 Pa. Super. 400; 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9376
343 Pa. Superior Ct. 400 (1985) 494 A.2d 1146 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Roderick Y. CURRY, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted January 22, 1985. Filed June 14, 1985. *401 Mitchell A. Kaufman, Assistant Public Defender, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Robert L. Eberhardt, Deputy Dist
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972-07-17 · Published · cited 0× · 6 Pa. Commw. 135; 293 A.2d 152; 1972 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 369
Opinion by Judge Rogers, The Port Authority of Allegheny County (Authority) here sought judgment in mandamus compelling the mayor of the City of Pittsburgh to execute deeds conveying to the Authority certain premises in which the city has an interest. The premises are (1) a property included between parallel planes, each 33 feet wide, located respectively 826.08 and 854.25 feet above sea level, being an unused
Philadelphia County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1969-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 47 Pa. D. & C.2d 222; 1969 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 258
BARBIERI, J., Before this court is an appeal by Thomas Curry, retired police captain, *223from the action of the Philadelphia Civil Service Commission in dismissing his appeal from its approval of a determination that his disablement from performance of duty was not service-connected. Proceedings were had before appellant’s appointing authority, the Philadelphia police co
Flaherty v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 152 La. 679; 94 So. 316; 1922 La. LEXIS 2347
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal. CAGE, District Judge. The plaintiffs brought a petitory action in the district court to revendicate a tract of 80 acres of land in the Claiborne oil fields worth more than $1,-000,000, and recovered judgment according to ■the prayer of their petition. The defendant applied for appeals to this court, devolutive and suspensive, and same were granted on a bond for
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014-10-30 · Published · cited 4× · 234 W. Va. 366; 765 S.E.2d 255; 2014 W. Va. LEXIS 1144
WORKMAN, Justice: This matter is before the Court upon an appeal by Myron Boggess and William Gill, individually and in their capacities as representatives of 162 firefighters (hereinafter “the petitioners”) from an October 7, 2013, order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County granting summary judgment to the City of Charleston (hereinafter “the City”) and a July 9, 2013, order
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009-06-23 · Published · cited 7× · 680 S.E.2d 110; 224 W. Va. 95; 2009 W. Va. LEXIS 60
680 S.E.2d 110 (2009) Evelyn L. "Peach" MURPHY, Administratrix of the Estate of and Andrew John Murphy, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. EASTERN AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION, a West Virginia corporation; Kenneth Greathouse, a West Virginia resident; Rodney Paxton, a West Virginia resident; Dorothy Lewis, a West Virginia resident; Dennis Lewis, a West Virginia resident; The Jack Company, a Pennsylvania corporation; S.W. Jack Drilling Company, a Penns
Dickman v. Generispublic domain
Connecticut Superior Court · 2004-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 48 Conn. Supp. 380; 845 A.2d 488
HON. RICHARD M. RITTENBAND, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE. The plaintiff, Priscilla Dickman, trustee of the Marcia K. Generis trust, brought a sixteen count amended complaint dated June 11, 2003, against the defendants. At the same time or shortly thereafter, those defendants each filed separate motions to dismiss. Their claims are, inter alia, that the plaintiff is not the proper party to bring the present action and that the onl
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999-08-06 · Published · cited 5× · 736 A.2d 67; 1999 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 618
736 A.2d 67 (1999) David L. LAMBIE, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CURRY LUMBER COMPANY), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs April 23, 1999. Decided August 6, 1999. *68 Peter D. Friday, Pittsburgh, for petitioner. Cynthia M. Porta, Pittsburgh, for respondent. Befo
Richardson v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 368 N.C. 158; 774 S.E.2d 304; 2015 N.C. LEXIS 654
PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14), the decision of the trial court is reversed. REVERSED. Justice HUDSON, Justice BEASLEY, and Justice ERVIN dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14). Justice BEASLEY also dissents f
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001-05-24 · Published · cited 3× · 2001 WI App 123; 630 N.W.2d 527; 246 Wis. 2d 561; 2001 Wisc. App. LEXIS 552
246 Wis.2d 561 (2001) 2001 WI App 123 630 N.W.2d 527 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent,[†] v. Franklin GILLETTE and V. Thomas Ostlund, Defendants-Appellants. No. 00-0637. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Oral argument November 30, 2000. Decided May 24, 2001.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998-07-10 · Published · cited 3× · 714 A.2d 1131; 1998 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 563
714 A.2d 1131 (1998) Sherry L. ROSS, Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and General Electric, Inc. and Budd Company and Buckeye Steel Castings Company. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 5, 1998. Decided July 10, 1998. Reargument Denied September 1, 1998. J. Craig Currie, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Hart v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 60× · 368 N.C. 122; 774 S.E.2d 281; 2015 N.C. LEXIS 655
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 372A14 Filed 23 July 2015 ALICE HART, RODNEY ELLIS, JUDY CHAMBERS, JOHN HARDING LUCAS, MARGARET ARBUCKLE, LINDA MOZELL, YAMILE NAZAR, ARNETTA BEVERLY, JULIE PEEPLES, W.T. BROWN, SARA PILAND, DONNA MANSFIELD, GEORGE LOUCKS, WANDA KINDELL, VALERIE JOHNSON, MICHAEL WARD, T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN, BRITTANY WILLIAMS, RAEANN RIVERA, ALLEN THOMAS, JIM EDMONDS, SASHA VRTUNSKI, PRI
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002-03-29 · Published · cited 63× · 2002 WI 31; 641 N.W.2d 662; 251 Wis. 2d 561; 2002 Wisc. LEXIS 225
251 Wis.2d 561 (2002) 2002 WI 31 641 N.W.2d 662 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Franklin GILLETTE and V. Thomas Ostlund, Defendants-Appellants. No. 00-0637. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument January 10, 2002. Decided March 29, 2002.