Cases

393 S.C. 264 (2011) 712 S.E.2d 440 Carolyn COLE and Windy Price, Appellants, v. TOWN OF ATLANTIC BEACH ELECTION COMMISSION, Respondent. Josephine Isom and Charlene Taylor, Intervenors. No. 26996. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 5, 2011. Decided July 7, 2011. Rehearing Denied July 22, 2011.

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Joseph Curry, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Miami Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust appeal the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs’ securities fraud complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs a

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

WILLIAMS, A.J.S.C. This condemnation action comes before the court on an order to show cause wherein plaintiff seeks a judgment appointing commissioners and determining that it has duly exercised its power of eminent domain with respect to certain property of defendant abutting State Highway No. 152 in Egg Harbor Township. Defendants Malibu and Seaview oppose the application. No other defendant appeared in opposition thereto

771 F.Supp. 911 (1991) WARNER/ELEKTRA/ATLANTIC CORPORATION; Warner Communications Inc.; and Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., As Subrogee for Warner/Elektra/Altantic Corporation and Warner Communications Inc., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, ILLINOIS, Defendant. No. 83 C 8230. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 18, 1991.

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

USCA11 Case: 22-14031 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 03/11/2025 Page: 1 of 112 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-14031 ____________________ MICHAEL J. POLELLE,

USCA11 Case: 21-11298 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11298 ____________________ REGINALD L. GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA,

JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Pro seplaintiffs Darlene F. Homere and Gerald Jean Baptiste ("plaintiffs") bring this action against the Incorporated Village of Hempstead ("the Village") and Stephanie Valder ("Valder" and, with the Village, "defendants"). Plaintiffs allege that, from 2008 through 2017, the Village conspired with Valder and other individuals to harass plaintiffs and to deprive plaintiffs of residential pr

107 N.H. 89 (1966) HAMPTON & a. v. HAMPTON BEACH IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC. & a. No. 5312. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued November 2, 1965. Decided March 30, 1966. *90 Cooper, Hall & Walker and Upton, Sanders & Upton (Mr. Robert W. Upton orally), for the plaintiffs.

*379MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs, Benjamin Case, Elizabeth Catlin, Jennifer Klein, and Mark Kushneir, bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (the “City) and nine individual defendants employed by the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), alleging that their constitutional righ

*1327 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge. “Let there be no noise made, my gentle friends; Unless some dull and favourable hand. Will whisper music to my weary spirit.”1 This lawsuit is about the havoc that a “few seconds”2 of loud music from a car stereo s

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 83). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 34-86, 42, 45), and the motion is ripe for resolution.1 After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the motion is due to be granted

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Winston McLennon, Karlick Price and Stephen Augustine bring this action, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, against the City of New York, New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) Commissioner William J. Brat-ton (“Commissioner Bratton”), New York City Police Transportation Bureau (“NYCTB”) Chief Thomas Chan (“Chief

OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael Dellutri (“Plaintiff’) has filed a Second Amended Complaint following removal of this action by Defendant Village of Elmsford (“Defendant” or “Elmsford”) from New York Supreme Court. Plaintiff alleges that officials of Elmsford engaged in various acts relating to Plaintiffs family dwelling in Elmsford, which constituted federal consti

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case arises from the decision of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the “NYDEC”) not to renew a general permit issued to the Village of West Hampton Dunes (the “Village” or the “Plaintiff’) for the building, rebuilding, and repair of structures on a barrier island located in the Village. Pursuant t

765 F.Supp.2d 158 (2011) Thomas HOY and Elke Hoy, Plaintiffs, v. The INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF BAYVILLE, et al., Defendants. No. 10-CV-0094 (JFB)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 25, 2011. *160 Andrew J. Campanelli, Campanelli & Associates, P.C., Garden City, NY, for Plaintiffs. Michael L. Cirr

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge In June 2014, Plaintiffs’ Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. (“CFSA”) and Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (“Advance America”) filed a Complaint against Defendants the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the FDIC”), the Board of Governors of th

629 F.2d 757 Earl G. SMITH, Administrator of the Estate of Gary DeanSmith, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY,Defendant-Appellee. No. 1142, Docket 80-7131. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued May 12, 1980.Decided July 10, 1980. L.