⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Cunningham-El v. Whitener”

Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-11-19 · Published · cited 22× · 704 S.E.2d 823; 307 Ga. App. 307; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3864; 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 1082
704 S.E.2d 823 (2010) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. No. A10A1509. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 19, 2010. Reconsideration Denied December 6, 2010. *825 Lefkoff, Duncan, Grimes, Miller & McSwain, John R. Grimes, Atlanta, for appellant. Smith, Gambrell & R
Morales v. Lugopublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971-02-25 · Published · cited 2× · 464 S.W.2d 694; 1971 Tex. App. LEXIS 2477
OPINION This appeal is from a judgment rendered after jury trial that appellants, Jose Morales and wife Susanna Morales, plaintiffs below, take nothing against appellee, Henry Lugo, defendant below. Appellants sued to recover damages for personal injuries to Mrs. Susanna Morales *Page 695 and property damage to appellants' car resulting from an automobile collision which occurred on September 18, 1968 in Corpus Christi, Tex
District Court, D. Maryland · 1987-09-01 · Published · cited 12× · 667 F. Supp. 1110; 26 ERC 1586; 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20073; 26 ERC (BNA) 1586; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8320
667 F.Supp. 1110 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Maryland Waste Coalition, Intervening Plaintiff, v. SCM CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. R-85-9. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 1, 1987. *1111 Fred R. Disheroon, Special Litigation Unit and David I.S. Thomson, Environmental Enforcement S
Texas Supreme Court · 1916-04-26 · Published · cited 502× · 185 S.W. 556; 108 Tex. 96; 1916 Tex. LEXIS 54
In this case we are called upon to answer seventeen questions certified by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District as to the constitutionality of the Act of the Thirty-third Legislature relating to the liability of employers and compensation of workmen for personal injuries. Apparently every possible constitutional question suggested by the Act has been embraced in the certificate, including some which the appellant was in no position to raise. The Act contains many